News — @

UN Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent Intervenes in Mumia Abu Jamal's Case

Photo: Joy Piette https://www.flickr.com/photos/109799466@N06/sets/72177720304505667/with/52567351322/

Judge Orders Philly DA to Disclose All Evidence in Mumia Abu-Jamal Case. Could It Lead to New Trial?

“Supporters of imprisoned journalist Mumia Abu-Jamal are celebrating a decision by a Philadelphia judge on Friday to order the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office to share all of its files on the case with Abu-Jamal's defense team. Judge Lucretia Clemons gave prosecutors and the defense 60 days to review the files, including many that Abu-Jamal's team has never seen. The judge is then expected to rule on whether to hold a new trial for the former Black Panther, who has been imprisoned for over 40 years for his 1982 conviction in the murder of police officer Daniel Faulkner. His supporters have long claimed prosecutors withheld key evidence and bribed or coerced witnesses to lie, and documents found in the DA's office in 2019 show Abu-Jamal's trial was tainted by judicial bias and police and prosecutorial misconduct."

REGARDING THE RECENT PROCEEDING IN THE CASE OF MUMIA ABU JAMAL, the International Movement for Reparations in Matinique (MIR) stated,

"Unprecedented, Never seen, is the fact that the Working Group on People of African Descent (set up at the UN in Geneva in the follow up of the Durban 2001 conference) produced a memorandum (attached) for put pressure on the judge (put pressure... or reassure her that she is no longer alone) who was hearing Mumia on December 16. With the effect that the Judge (black) clearly dared to change her decision. The OHCHR (through a group of experts on people of African descent), weighing on an internal decision of a US court relating to a former Black Panther, ....something has happen here."

HERE IS THE WORKING GROUP OF EXPERTS ON PEOPLE OF AFRICAN DESCENT AMICUS CURIE BRIEF:

REMEMBERING THE PEOPLE’S INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR JUSTICE FOR MUMIA ABU-JAMAIL, an excerpt from my book, From Yale to Rastafari

“In November 1997, I organized the Peoples of Chicago Ad-Hoc Committee in Support of Justice for Mumia Abu-Jamal (PCMAJ) which traveled to Philadelphia on December 4th for the Peoples’ International Tribunal for Justice for Mumia Abu-Jamal held at the Blue Horizon on December 6th. The trip was free to all 11 delegates which included two elders and the Rastafar Livity Nyabinghi Choir. In addition to hanging a large banner of Bob Marley that read, “How Long Shall They Kill Our Prophets?” we drummed and chanted Nyahbinghi during the Tribunal. There, I met Sundiata Sadiq, Gamal Nkrumah (Kwame Nkrumah’s son) and Julia Wright, daughter of famed author Richard Right. I presented a brief outlining international legal arguments and justifications for an international rescue team to rescue Mumia Abu-Jamal from prison to Adekoye Akinwole (Herman Ferguson), a Tribunal Judge, one of the original signers of the Republic of New Afrika’s Declaration of Independence, and the RNA’s first Minister of Education. I had hoped that my brief or parts of it would make it into the Tribunal’s Indictment that was delivered on December 10 to Dr. Purification Quisumbing, Director of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Office in New York.

‘ I am concerned,’ I said to Baba Adekoye Akinwole, ‘that should they begin to march brother Mumia to the gas chamber, that no one will attempt to rescue him. I ask you, a member of the Black Liberation Army (BLA), what is to be done?’ Baba Adekoye’s response while receiving my brief was,

‘THE BLA IS AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN, UNDERGROUND. DO NOT WORRY.’ THAT WAS ALL HE SAID.”

Share

Guinea Bissau Citizenship Update: Important Meeting With Conservador dos Registros Centrais (Keeper of Central Records)

December 20, 2022 - Bissau, Guinea Bissau - Djulde Baldé, Conservador dos Registros Centrais (Keeper of Central Records) met with Decade of Return Coordinators Siphiwe Baleka and Daiana Taborda Gomes to give the latest update on the citizenship process and the status of the 23 applications he keeps in his office. The meeting was a follow-up to the meetings that were held on December 2, December 8 and on December 16th. Balanto Djassi (aka Yama Cisse on Facebook) and Abraham Santos Dias, representatives of the Roots to Guinea Bissau organization were invited to the meeting but did not attend.

Mr. Baldé explained the entire process and status of the 23 applications that he has received (see below). All of the security checks have been cleared by Interpol. On August 8, the Ministry of Justice asked the Prime Minister to waive all the fees and two days later, the Prime Minister agreed to reduce the fees by 50%.

Prime Minister

Eng. Nuno Gomes Nabiam

BISSAU

Bissau, 08/02/2022

No. Ref 2o3 /GMJDH/2022

Subject: Request for intervention.

With our distinguished greetings.

On 29/04/2022, we received the letter Rel. CPM/282/mc/2022, a request for the acquisition of Guinean nationality for African-Americans descending from Guinea Bissau, previously authorized by Your Excellency, was sent to my office. In this consonance, and completing the formalities for the purpose of attributing nationality, we request Your Excellency to be worthy, on an exceptional basis, to grant the waiver of payment of the relevant fees, since they involve relatively large sums (770,482.00 x 23 persons), whose payments should be made directly at the Single Office of the Public Treasury.

With no further business for the time being, please accept, Prime Minister, my full consideration.

Minister Teresa Alexandrina da Silva.

Handwriting: Authorized the exemption of 50% of the value.

To the Office of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights

Bissau, August 10, 2022

Subject matter: In/Ref. REf: 203/ GNHDG/2022 - Entry no. 3268.

GPM/714/mc/2022

The Office of His Excellency the Prime Minister sends his best regards to the Office of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights.

Following V. Correspondence on the above subject, we would like to inform you that the request was authorized by a superior, only 50% of the value, by Dispatch of His Excellency the Prime Minister, recorded in the attached letter.

High regard.

The Cabinet Director,

Jose Paulo Domingos Semena

Unfortunately, Ms. Balanto Djassi failed to inform us of this development back in August and we were thus unable to collect payments at that time. This is the reason for the delay in the process.

The Keeper of the Records now has all the files in his possession. The next step is to collect payment. Once payment is collected, the Decade of Return Coordinators will deposit the payments at the Treasury and issue a receipt to the Decade of Return Coordinators who will then take the receipts back to the Keeper of the Records who will add them to the file. The Keeper of the Records will then send the files to the General Director of the Ministry of Justice who will send it to the Minister of Justice who will take it to the Prime Minister. At this point, the issue of the naturalization applications will be entered into the agenda of the Council of Ministers. Because several ministers have various levels of interest - i.e. Minister of Tourism, Minister of Culture, Minister of Foreign Affaris, Minister of Justice - this part of the process could take a week or several months. No one knows. However, Mr. Baldé explained to us that the Ministry treats the naturalization applications as a single file. They prefer to move the file forward rather than each individual application, which will slow the process, since individual applications will not be a priority for the Council of Ministers, but a group file of African Americans will be a priority. Towards that end, he highly recommended, as he did in our previous meeting, that those who are ready should make their payment to the Decade of Return account in Guinea Bissau. Then, right after the holidays, we will deposit the money into the State Treasury and return the receipts to him. Those who would like to do this and ensure their file is included in the first group should email repatbissau@gmail.com for the payment information. We have already collected payment from people on the list.

Finally, we showed Mr. Baldé analytics from our website, including the data that showed that since our meeting on December 8, as many as 245 people came to us to get information about citizenship in Guinea Bissau and that we were already promoting tours for 2023 with the view to helping the government host its first Citizenship Ceremony in May.

We explained to the Keeper of Records the model that is being used in Sierra Leone and suggested that we could follow the same model, whereby his office would recognize various groups authorized to process applications and the government hosts Citizenship Ceremonies twice a year. However, processing applications involves having the capacity to translate the documents which not all groups may possess. Mr. Baldé said that it could work that way but that they prefer that a united front represent any groups that may wish to become part of the process. This is exactly the reason why from the very beginning, The Minister of Culture issued a document inviting everyone to coordinate through the Decade of Return. For the benefit of all the descendants of people taken from Guinea Bissau who wish to obtain citizenship, as well as for the benefit of the government of the Republic of Guinea Bissau, it is best that we demonstrate the original spirit that initiated the process and already demonstrated the capacity to process the applications and collect payment. Unity for Guinea Bissau!

FOR THOSE WHO WANT TO INITIATE A NATURALIZATION APPLICATION,

COMPLETE THE FORM HERE

Invitation

“The Secretary of State for Culture, having knowledge of African-Americans of Guinea-Bissau descendants interested in visiting the country, serves to formulate an invitation to give them greater openness and possibility to arrive in Guinea-Bissau.

So that there is no impediment, this invitation will be signed and authenticated with the oil stamp used in this institution.

The contact will be through the coordinator of the return decade Siphiwe Baleka of the Balanta B'urassa History & Genealogy Society in America and from his team in Bissau and the association Ban Faaba.

Bissau, June 21, 2021

The Secretary of State,

Dr. Francelino da Cunha”

Share

Strategic Reparations Litigation: Transgenerational Epigenetic Effects, Ethnocide and Prisoner of War Claims - A Look at Cases Against France and the United States

On Wednesday, December 7th, The Movement4Black Lives, Global Black, and the Open Society Justice Initiative hosted a side-event during the launch of the Permanent Forum of People of African Descent in Geneva, Switzerland. The theme of the event was “Adding to the Action: The Role of Strategic Litigation in Movements for Reparations” and aimed at growing an international network of litigators, organizers and other human rights leaders responding to our communities’ call for reparations. The event invitation stated, “Collectively, we’ll map the global landscape of successful action, strategic opportunities and share some of the legal and political barriers we face.”

According to the Open Society Justice Initiative, 

“Our definition of strategic combines community engagement, in-court-action, and out-of-court advocacy to seek systemic change. It is often rooted in preparatory research, documentation, and dialogue with affected communities to identify pathways that include, but are not limited to, legal action. While some cases may attract large-scale media coverage, others may quietly lay the groundwork for subsequent efforts whose cumulative impact is visible over time. Our measure of impact in strategic litigation is not confined to a formal pronouncement from a court. In some instances, the threat of litigation can create space for marginalized voices, even the playing field, spotlight abuse, , prompt public pressure, grant legitimacy to long-silenced claims, and narrow the range of available justifications for defenders of oppression.”

This article discusses the most promising reparations strategic litigation opportunities that are related to the newly developed sciences of transgenerational epigenetic effects of slavery, ancestral DNA testing, ethnocide and prisoner of war claims under the Geneva Convention.

The Deadria Farmer-Paellmann Reparations Case

Deadria Farmer-Paellmann spent five years digging for evidence that tied Corporate America to pre-Civil War slavery. Farmer-Paellmann v. Fleetboston Financial Corp. was argued on March 26, 2002. It was the first class-action lawsuit filed to seek compensation from US insurance companies who previously profited from the enslavement of African peoples. The case was dismissed in 2004, amended, resubmitted and dismissed again in 2005 on the basis of the statute of limitations and other considerations, while the Supreme Court refused to hear the appeal in October 2007

Tara Kolar Ramchandani, in Judicial Recognition of the Harms of Slavery: Consumer Fraud as an Alternative to Reparations Litigation, recognized the value of strategic reparations litigation, writing.

“These cases have been dismissed for a variety of procedural and jurisdictional reasons, including statutes of limitations, the political question doctrine, sovereign immunity, and lack of standing—hurdles preventing such cases from being decided on their merits. . . . Due to the fact that the original harms of the “peculiar institution” were inflicted against men and women who lived generations ago, it is difficult to surmount threshold procedural issues, and access to the courts is barred for both private and public rights of action.

On December 13, 2006, the door to the courthouse reopened with the possibility of claims based on current violations of consumer fraud and protection acts. The right of action under these acts provides a new hope for recognition of the great harms inflicted through slavery by the judicial system. In In re African American Slave Descendants Litigation, the Seventh Circuit reviewed the district court’s dismissal of a class action reparations suit brought by African American descendants of slaves.

This recent development argues that although claims under consumer fraud and protection statutes may not garner large sums of money, they should be vigorously pursued for four reasons: 

(1) such claims may present the only avenue for judicial recognition and vindication of the evils of slavery; 

(2) publicity and media campaigns following lawsuits may spur a larger movement toward non-judicially enforced reparations; 

(3) as has happened with previous reparations suits, the filing of suits may lead to out-of-court settlements; and 

(4) recognition of the injuries inflicted upon plaintiffs will provide a dignitary value previously unrecognized by the American justice system.

While claims under consumer fraud may provide an alternative to the more traditional reparations claims, there is an entirely new class of reparations claims that appear to have even greater promise.

Dr. Kenneth Knave and  Judge Norgle’s Decision 

In 2020, Dr. Kenneth Knave's published Competent Proof: The Legal Standing for African Americans in the Battle for Reparations  reviewing Judge Norgle's decision in the Deadria Farmer-Pellmann case. Dr. Knave correctly identified that 

"Judge Norgle ended the document with V. CONCLUSION, stating that '(the) Plaintiffs' claims, as alleged in their Complaint, FAIL based on numerous well-settled legal principles. Mr. Norgle makes five legal statements that summarize his arguments which are in agreement with the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss:

1. Plaintiffs' claims are beyond the constitutional authority of the Court (Federal). Plaintiffs lack essential constitutional standing requirements to bring their claims because they FAIL TO ALLEGE ANY SPECIFIC CONNECTION BETWEEN THEMSELVES AND THE NAMED DEFENDANTS.

2. Prudential limitations prohibit the court from deciding such BROAD QUESTIONS OF  SOCIAL IMPORTANCE when such claims are brought on behalf of absent third parties, as Plaintiffs attempt here.

3. The POLITICAL QUESTION DOCTRINE bars the (federal) court from deciding the issue of slavery reparations, an issue that has been historically and constitutionally committed to the Legislative and Executive branches of government.

4. Plaintiffs' claims fail to fall within the recognized legal statutes of limitations.

5. Plaintiffs' Complaint FAILS TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED.”

Making a Successful Reparations Claim By Overcoming Judge Norgle’s Five Causes for Dismissal 

When you study Judge Norgle's 76-page statement on the dismissal of the Deadria Farmer-Paellmann reparations case, you will learn that the way to overcome the state's motion to dismiss is by naming the specifics - who, what, where, when and how. Paellmann's case was dismissed because it didn’t prove any specific connection between any of the defendant's (the insurance companies involved in the slave trade) and the plaintiffs (the victims).

So we learned from this that that is the FIRST thing you have to do - show the specific connection between plaintiffs and defendants. Judge Norgel was basically giving us a roadmap of how to WIN by staying away from legal positions they have already settled.

Thus, the way to overcome #1 is to make the specific connection between plaintiff and defendants.

The way to overcome #2 is to switch from a BROAD, COLLECTIVE argument to a narrow, INDIVIDUAL argument.

The way to overcome #3 is to switch from a traditional reparations argument to an argument based on prenatal, preconception, and prima facie torts - i.e. transgenerational epigenetic effects.

The way to overcome #4 is to show that the crime is current since they have never repaired the genetic damage - i.e. the slave DNA was never ended and is still harming us. [Also, there are no statutes of limitation concerning crimes against humanity - i.e. ETHNOCIDE]

The way to overcome #5 is to calculate the actual economic value of the labor of your ancestors that were enslaved (which can be done through genealogy work - I have done it) as well as the value of the unjust enrichment; identify specific territory to be repatriated to; and calculate the cost of the social, cultural and political claims under the international conventions.

The key to the above, the mechanism for linking the harms of slavery to the present generation, is utilizing the transgenerational epigenetic effects of slavery and genealogy.

Transgenerational Epigenetic Effects of Slavery

Kenneth S. Nave, MD states, 

“Science has proven that environmental conditions shape the structure and function of highly specialized cells in key areas of the body. These changes occur in an extension or appendage to the gene known as the Epigene. The Epigene is an extension of the gene that responds to biochemical signals emanating from the environment. These signals cause changes to the gene. These epigenetic changes to the gene influence and change the cellular genetics of the cell. . . . Under certain environmental conditions, the epigenome programs or ‘reprograms’ the genetics of the cells of the limbic system which, in its most fundamental definition, is the center of all human thought, emotion, behavior, learning and, when present, psychosocial pathology. . . This environmental shaping is usually pathologic leading to physical disease, social dysfunction, and mental illness. Most significantly to the plight and social conditions of the descendants of former slaves is the scientifically proven fact that the changes to the epigene created by environmental pathology is passed down to the descendants of those initially impacted by environmental gene shaping. . . . As it relates to the cells of the brain, this cellular shaping can lead to problems with learning, memory, and mental health. As it relates to cells of the heart and cardiovascular system, these changes can lead to heart attacks, strokes, and kidney failure. Endocrine cells genetic shaping can lead to diabetes and metabolic syndrome. . . . This environmental shaping of the gene is well confirmed and is also recognized to be transmissible at least to the fourth generation of one’s descendants and beyond. That means that any environmental hardship experienced by your ancestors and causing this genetic environmental shaping could possibly, and is probably, transferred down to you, their descendant, and likewise your progeny, for generations. This is The Transgenerational Epigenetic Effect (TGEE).”

Developing Cause of Action for the Baleka Case against the United States Using TGEE, Genealogy, and Tort Claims

The 1st amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The 4th amendment guarantees the right to liberty. The 13th amendment abolishes slavery and involuntary servitude and the 14th amendment guarantees the equal protection of the laws. Here, then, is the construction of a tort claim.

Black’s Law Dictionary, 11th Edition:

1.       Tort-claims act. (1926) – A federal or state statute that, under stated circumstances, waives sovereign immunity and allows lawsuits by people who claim they have been injured by the government or its agents and employees

2.   Federal Tort Claims Act. (1946) – A statute that limits federal sovereign immunity and allows recovery in federal court for tort damages caused by federal employees, but only if the law of the state where the injury occurred would hold a private person liable for the injury. 28 USCA $$ 2671-2680 – Abbr. FTCA

3.       Preconception tort. (1977) – A tort that is committed before the victim has been conceived.

4.       Prenatal tort. (1960) – A tort committed against a fetus. If born alive, a child can sue for injuries resulting from tortious conduct predating the child’s birth.

5.       Prima facie tort. (1938) – An unjustified, intentional infliction of harm on another person, resulting in damages, by one or more acts that would otherwise be lawful. Some jurisdictions have established this tort to provide a remedy for malicious deeds – esp. in business and trade contexts – that are not actionable under traditional tort law.

6.       Negligent tort. (1865) – A tort committed by failure to observe the standard of care required by law under the circumstances.

7.       Business tort. (1935) – A tort that impairs some aspect of an economic interest or business relationship, causing economic loss rather than property damage or bodily harm. Business torts include tortious interference with prospective advantage, unfair business practices, misappropriation of trade secrets, and product disparagement.

Because I have done the genealogy work to identify my ancestor that was captured from his ancestral homeland and trafficked across the Atlantic and enslaved in the Carolinas, I can now make the following claims:

1.       Tort claims act, which allows lawsuits by people who claim they have been injured by the government, gives me cause of action.

2.       My complaint is based on a prenatal tort. I am claiming that the State of South Carolina committed tortious conduct that constituted a preconception tort that resulted in injuries (epigenetic mutations) at the moment I was born alive.

3.       The Negro Laws of South Carolina (1740) establishing the slave manufacturing process that relied on torture and was used against my great, great, great, great, great grandfather Brassa Nchabra is a prima facie tort that continues to cause injury through the Transgenerational Epigenetic Effect producing biopsychosocial disorders and the Syndrome of Sociopathy.

4.   The United States 111th Congress (S.Con.Res.26) acknowledged the prima facie tort, stating, “The Congress (A) acknowledges the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery and Jim Crow laws; (B) apologizes to African- Americans on behalf of the people of the United states, for the wrongs committed against them and their ancestors who suffered under slavey and Jim Crow laws; ”

5.       The United States government committed a negligent tort after the Emancipation Proclamation when it passed the 13th amendment which only terminated the property rights permitting whites to possess or distribute slaves, but allowed them to legally retain and benefit from the intellectual property rights to dehumanization, slaves and slavery because the concepts, as intellectual properties, are legally distinct and separate from the property rights. Intellectual Property rights were entirely neglected. The United States neglected its moral, legal and scientific responsibility to provide and enforce a scientific method to reverse engineer the epigenetic status of all living slave mutations derived from the original slaves manufactured by the American States and its licensees. This neglect created a preconception tort and the prenatal tort of epigenetic damage at the moment of my birth.

6.       The United States continues to commit a negligent tort by its failure to make meaningful and undertake measures, by virtue of Article VI of the United States Constitution, to implement its obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights under the framework of the Declaration on the use of scientific and technological progress in the interests of peace and for the benefit of mankind PROCLAIMED BY GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION 3384(XXX) OF 10 - NOVEMBER 1975 and the United Nations Commission’s Appendix 1. Resolution 1986/9 outlining the USE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS FOR THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS.

7.     Specifically, Article 8 of Appendix 2 reads, “All States shall take effective measures, including legislative measures, to prevent and preclude the utilization of scientific and technological achievements to the detriment of human rights and fundamental freedoms and the dignity of the human person.” Upholding the legal retention and benefit from the intellectual property rights to dehumanization, slaves and slavery is a violation of my Constitutional rights. The United States government’s failure to take effective measures, including legislative measures, to repair the epigenetic mutations and the Transgenerational Epigenetic Effect of the dehumanization process is a negligent tort subject to a remedy.

8.     The prima facie, preconception, prenatal and negligent torts outlined above created a business tort as evidenced by the collective racial wealth gap which I continue to suffer.

9.       The United States 111th Congress Disclaimer stating that “Nothing in this resolution (S.Con.Res.26) (A) authorizes or supports any claim against the United States” violates my 14th Amendment right to equal protection under the law and creates another negligent tort.

CONSTRUCTING MY CIVIL RIGHTS CLAIM

1.       Preconception and prenatal torts producing epigenetic mutations, the Transgenerational Epigenetic Effects of dehumanization and slavery, and the Syndrome of Sociopathy violated my 13th amendment right to be free from slavery at the moment of my live birth and continues to the present.

2.       Negligent torts upholding the legal retention and benefit from the intellectual property rights to dehumanization, slaves and slavery violated my 13th amendment right to be free from slavery at the moment of my live birth and continues to the present.

3.       Black’s Law Dictionary, 11th Edition, defines liberty as “1. Freedom from arbitrary or undue external restraint, esp. by a government <give me liberty or give me death>. ‘[Liberty] denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and generally to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.’ Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 43 S.Ct. 625, 626 (1923).”

4.       Preconception and prenatal torts producing epigenetic mutations, the Transgenerational Epigenetic Effects of dehumanization and slavery, and the Syndrome of Sociopathy violate my 5th amendment right to life, liberty, and property.

5.       Negligent torts upholding the legal retention and benefit from the intellectual property rights to dehumanization, slaves and slavery violated my 5th amendment right to life, liberty, and property.

6.       The United States failure to undertake measures, by virtue of Article VI of the United States Constitution, to implement its obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights is a negligent tort that violates my 14th Amendment right to equal protection under the law.

Utilizing the Geneva Convention and Ethnocide in International Jurisdiction

The Geneva Conventions says, 

"1949 Geneva Convention: Article 4 (1) defines prisoners of war as “Members of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict, as well as members of militias or volunteer corps forming part of such armed forces.” 

Article 5 states, 

“The present Convention shall apply to the persons referred to in Article 4 from the time they fall into the power of the enemy and until their final release and repatriation." 

SO IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A SUCCESSFUL CLAIM UNDER THE GENEVA CONVENTION, YOU NEED TO IDENTIFY WHEN YOU FELL INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. 

If you can't answer that, then the Convention makes the following provision - 

"Should doubt arise as to whether persons, having committed a belligerent act and having fallen into the hands of the enemy, belong to any of the categories enumerated in Article 4, such persons shall enjoy protection of the present Convention until such time as their status has been determined by a competent tribunal.”  

Now, it can be argued that Afrodescendent has been determined already by a competent tribunal -- the Durban Declaration and the Third World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance in the city of Santiago, Chile in the year 2000 and it was the term adopted in 2002 by nineteen (19) countries at the United Nations Conference for the Rights of Minorities in La Ceiba, Honduras.

The idea is to file a case in domestic court. If it gets past a motion to dismiss, great. We have made an advance. If not, that is great, too because I can now claim I have exhausted all domestic remedies to exercise my 1st amendment right to bring grievance against the United States for damage resulting from the ETHNOCIDE of my 5g Great Grandfather Brassa Nchabra, which damage continues unrepaired in my DNA. Having exhausted all domestic remedies, I can now bring my individual human rights case before international tribunals, especially the Inter American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) which is the only avenue for American citizens to bring individual human rights cases.

Let us look now at a similar effort that came out of Martinique.

Examining the International Movement For Reparations Association (MIR) Case Against France

Law 2001-434 of 21 May 2001 of Africle 1 states that 

“The French Republic recognizes that the transatlantic slave trade and the Indian Ocean slave trade on the one hand, and slavery on the other hand, perpetrated from the fifteenth century onwards, in the Americas and the Caribbean, in the Indian Ocean and in Europe against the African, Amerindian, Malagasy and Indian populations constitute a crime against humanity.”

Considering the French State responsible for the crimes against humanity that were the slave trade and slaver, the associations known as the International Movement for Reparations in Matinique (MIR) and the World Council of the Pan African Diaspora (CMDPA) summoned the French State before the Fort-de-France Regional Court by deed dated 30 May 2005. In the course of the proceedings, 57 individuals intervened. On the basis of Law No. 2001-434, those applicants - both on behalf of their successors and on their own behalf and the people of Martinique, initiated proceedings before the French judicial courts for their claim for damage resulting from the slave trade and colonial slavery. MIR and  CMDPA asked for

-  an expertise, at the expense of the State, entrusted to a panel of experts and intended to assess the damage suffered by the Martinican people,

-  a provision of 200 billion euros managed by the department and the region, pending the constitution of a foundation,

-  in addition to the sum of € 5,000 on the basis of Article 700 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The case was debated at the public hearing of 29 September 2017 and judgement given December 19, 2017. The right to compensation to which everyone was legitimately entitled under the abovementioned law of 21 May 2001 was reduced to nothing by the finding that the applicants’ claims were time-barred, and therefore inadmissable. Of considerable significance is that the decision dismissed the actions of MIR and CMDPA stating, 

they did not justify a personal and current injury sufficiently related to the crimes suffered by those of their ancestors who had been victims of trafficking or slavery,’ and “if it were accepted the claimed right would be rebourn with each generation, thus ensuring the imprecriptibility* of the harmful effects of the crime over time. . . . the first judges considered exactly on the merits that they did not justify, nearly two centuries after the definitieve abolition of slavery, suffering individually from a damage of their own that could be directly and certainly linked to the crimes suffered by those fo their ancestors who were victims of the slave trade and slavery.”

*In law, a right or obligation which cannot be extinguihsed by negative prescription (the barring of adverse claims to property after a specified period of time has elapsed). . . even if the prescriptive period has expired, the right or obligation will continue to subsist. 

An appeal was brought against the decision and by judgment delivered on 17 April 2019, the Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal stating that, 

“The Court of Appeal had therefore decided exactly that this action, in so far as it concerned facts which had ended in 1848 and despite the suspension of the limitation period util the day on which the victims or their successors had been ablet to act, was presceded in the absence of demonstration of an impediment which would have lasted for more than a period of time - a hundred years.”

An appeal against the judgement was thus made with the European Court of Human Rights (see below). Meanwhile, on 20 March 2014, forty-eight natural persons, MIR, the association Comite d’organisation du 10 Mai and the International Committee of Black Peoples (CIPN) summoned the judicial agent of the State to assess, repair and compensate for the crimes of slave trade and slavery. By judgement delivered on 4 April 2017, the Fort-de-France Regional Court declared the inadmissibility of the claims of MIR and dismissed all of the applicants’ other claims. Here, the decision introduced a new concept, namely that,

“The Act of 26 December 1964, which provided for imprescriptibility for crimes against humanity, referred to acts committed during the Second World War and was retroactive only in this very particular context.”

In essance, the state of France was willing to illegally discriminate between Jewish claims and African claims simply on the basis that the Jewish claims were based on events that happened 100 years AFTER those of the Africans. . . . 

On 30 May 2017, the appellants appealed againts the court’s decision. The case was referred to pre-trial preparation and by separate pleadings lodged on 5 April and 18 September 2018, the appellants referred to the Court two prioritiy questions of constitutionality. The appellants 

“essentially accused the trial judges of having violated the provisions of Article 14 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which prohibits any discrimination on grounds of sex, race, colour or religion, and on the other hand of having excluded their righ to compensation. This constitutes discrimination that undermines the principle of black human rights, and finally refuses to recognize this principle, which is inherent in the recognition of the slave trade and slavery as crimes against humanity, which undermines the principle of equality in law and dignity of human beings as well as the fundamental principles constituting the common ground of all civilized peoples and nations. . . . such motivations stem from an ‘ideology of law rooted in a tradition of denial of human rights.’”

On the inadmissibility alleging the absence of genealogical proof of the ancestry of natural persons, the court noted,

“All claim their status as descendants of the enslaved deportees and thus to have suffered damage, both as beneficiairies and in a personal capacity, for which they seek compensation. They add that although they cannot justify genealogy established in a precise and proven way, they nevertheless remain Afro-descendants from the slave society, which did not vanish with the decree of abolition. . . . the notion of ‘descendant’ refers to that of heir to a given society with its characteristics inscribed in economic, social and cultural structures marked by the reproduction and continuity of relationships and models originating in the slave trade and slavery, and that one can therefore limit oneself to the strict ‘bio-genealogical’ level, rendering the plea of inadmissibility advanced by the judicial agent of the State inoperative. . . . . They also argue that the denial of the normative nature of this text contravenes the principle of equality before the law and the principle of the right to reparation available to any wrong, by excluding any possibility of an action for compensation and by preventing the application of the principle of imprescriptibility recongized to crimes against humanity. . . . They add that this text, which defines trafficking and slavery as crimes against humanity, is indeed a law of criminal incrimination that cannot be deprived of normative scope either because the perpetrators of the crimes are dead or because the State is criminally irresponsbile. For them, this does not erase either the qualification or the reality of the crime, nor the possibility of an actions for compensation. They conclude that this must lead to the recognition of the principle of imprescriptibiltiy of crimes against humanity and that of the retroactivity of the laws qualifiying them. They therefore consider that the first judges violated these principles by applying rules contrary to the international treaties to which France had subsribed, but also contrary to the case-law of the Criminal Division of the Court of Cassation of 26 February 1984 at the end of which by nature any crime against humanity is imprescriptible and escapes the principle of non-retroactivity. They thus assert that these general principles of law must be applied not only to the acts of the Axis powers during the Second World War but to all the facts classified as crimes against humanity as reflected in Articles 7(2) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 15(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. . . . They therefore consider . . . the collective conscience making any material reparation impossible by deduction, has placed the victims of these crimes, unlike those of the crimes committed by the Axis powers, in the impossibility of acting.”

MIR and CIPN also raised the issue of transgenrational epigenetic effects. The court noted, 

“They also refer to previous studies carried out at the University of Cambridge and advances in epigenetic science over the past twenty years which have highlighted the influence of the human environment on genetics and the existence of transmission phenomena through generations of historical collective trauma of a dehumanizing nature. They conclude that the transgenerational prejudice covers both material damage resulting from the absence of any patrimonial transmission for the freedmen referred to in the 1848 decree, but also moral prejudice, which lies in the deprivation of the right to a genealogy and in the acculturation of current generations with regard to their culture of origin, the notion of ‘creolity’ being only a product of colonization and an imposed culture.

By two judgments delivered on 11 February 2020, the Fort-de-France Court of Appeal declared these questions inadmissible. The proceedings were closed on 13 October 2020. In its decision, the court stated, 

“ . . . it should be noted that Article 121-2 of the Criminal Code lays down the principle of the State’s non-criminal responsbility and that the tools of international law were designed only to judge and punish natural persons guilty of crimes against humanity. On this basis if Articles 7.2 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 15-2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Civil rights establishing the possibility of trial and punshment of a person guilty of an act or omission which, at the time when they were committed, were criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the civil nations, Such provisions are applicable only to natural persons in the absence of any international recognition of the criminal responsibility of States for crimes committed during periods of slavery and the slave trade. The resolution of 16 december 2005 adopted by the United Nations General Assembly merely recommended that States take into account and promote respect for the fundamental principles and guidelines and bring them to the attention of members of the executive, legislative, and judicial organs of the State, victims and their representatives, human rights defenders and lawyers, of the media and the general public without conferring on them any coercive character and without really being implemented in the former slave powers.

Similarly, it may be noted that the criminalization of crimes against humanity has its origin in the London Agreement of 8 August 1945 which established an international military tribunal to try the major war criminals of the European Axis countries for murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and any other inhuman act committed against any civilian population, before or during war, or persecution on political, racial or religious grounds, when such acts, whether or not they constituted a violation of the domestic law of the country where they were committed. However, this tribunal had jurisdiction only to try major war criminals from the Axis countries.

In addition, the Act of 3 January 1995 implementing United Nations Security Council Resolution 827 of 25 May 1993 establishing an international tribunal for the purpose of trying persons responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1 January 1991, or the Act of 22 May 1996 adopted for the implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 955 of 8 November 1994 establishing an international tribunal for the purpose of trying persons responsible for genocide and other serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of Rwanda, as well as Rwandan citizens responsible for genocide and other such violations committed in the territory of neighboring States between 1 January and 31 December 1994, also apply only to natural persons.

Moreover, although these offenses are retroactive, they derogate from international law which enshrines the legality of offences and penalties and the non-retroactivity of the more severe criminal law as set out in Article 8 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, 7-1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, 15-1 of the International Covenenant on Civil and Political Rights, the principle of non-retroactivity recognized by the Constitutional Council on 21 January 1997 and the provisions of articles 111-3 and 112-1 of the Criminal Code. Therefore, in the absence of a general derogation or permissible exception to the principle of non-retroactivity of the more severe criminal law, it is necessary to examine the admissibility of the plaintiff’s action solely in the light of the provisions of Article 10 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the rules of limitation in civil matters refferred to above.”

In respect to the argument provided by the science of transgenerational epigenetic effects of slavery, the court stated, 

“Nevertheless, none of the admissbile parties produces sufficiently convincing evidence capable of establishing that they suffer individually from an injury of its own which can be directly and certainly linked to the crimes suffered by their ascendants who are victims of trafficking and slaver. The only references to academic works highlighting trangenerational prejudices linked to the influence of the human environment on genetics and the existence of phenomena of transmission of historical collective traumas of a dehumanizing nature, but also the only general references to material and moral prejudices experienced by all descendants of slaves (in particular the absence of transmission of heritage, the deprivation of a right to a genealogy and the persistence of an acculturation of current generations) do not make it possible to establish for each of the natural persons the existence of a certain, direct and personal prejudice in connection with the transatlantic slave trade and slavery. The first judges will therefore also be approved in that they have rejeted the requests of these heads as well as those of the Organizing Committee of May 10 and the International Committee of Black Peoples who come in support of the applicants natural persons without demonstrating their prejudice.”

European Court of Human Rights

Finally, the European Court of Human Rights in reviewing the case, stated on October 10, 2019,

“21.    In the present case, although the provisions of the Act of 21 May 2001 describe the acts of slavery and the slave trade as crimes against humanity, they do not provide for any mechanism for compensating the direct and indirect victims of these acts contrary to Article 4 of the Convention.

Such an absence undoubtedly conflicts with this provision, which it has been recalled creates positive obligations on the Contracting States, in particular as regards the existence of a legal and regulatory framework capable of enabling victims to assert their rights in practice.

In the absence of specific legal provisions relating to compensation for these acts of slavery, the French courts consider proceedings brought by the descendants of slaves to be unreceivable because they are time-barred.

Yet, the principle of prohibition of slavery would be deprived of an essential part of its effects if it did not include, as an indispensable corollary, the right to reparation of the victims of those acts.

It should be emphasized that "to deny the right to reparation" is to "deny the dignity of the individual and therefore to deny man" (L. Boisson de Chazournes, J.-F.   Queguiner and S.  Villalpando (dir.), Crimes de l'histoire et reparations: les réponses du droit et de la justice, éd. Bruylant, éd. de l'Université de Bruxelles, Coll. de Droit international n° 57, 2004, p. 85 in E. Lambert-Abdelgawad, RSC,  2005, p. 454).

Conversely, this legal impasse has the effect of exonerating the French State from its personal responsibility for the damage caused by this crime against humanity.

France should therefore have provided for provisions setting up a specific compensation mechanism derogating from ordinary law; all the more so since this was the primary purpose of the Law of 21 May 2001. . . . Therefore, by classifying the acts as slavery without drawing the consequences from the point of view of reparations, France disregarded the positive obligations derived from the need to ensure the effectiveness of the principle of prohibition of acts of slavery.

Consequently, and in the light of all the foregoing, the applicant has suffered a violation of Article 4 of the Convention, a violation attributable to the respondent State. . . . 

21.    In the present case, discrimination between, on the one hand, the victims of the slave trade and, on the other, the victims of other crimes against humanity, including the Holocaust.

Indeed, on the one hand,  it is accepted in French law that crimes against humanity are, by nature, imprescriptible.

Thus, under the terms of the single article of the Act of 26 December 1964 establishing the imprescriptibility of crimes against humanity: "Crimes against humanity, as  defined by the United Nations resolution of 13 February 1946, taking note of the definition of crimes against humanity, as set out in the Charter of the International Tribunal of 8 August 1945,  are imprescriptible by their nature".

Articles 213-4 and 213-5 of the Criminal Code confirm that "the perpetrator or accomplice of a crime referred to in this subtitle may not be exonerated from liability solely for the fact that he has performed a time barred act [...]".

These texts implement principles set out in the Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity as adopted by the United Nations (UN) on 26 November 1968, according to which "The application to war crimes and crimes against humanity  of the rules of domestic law relating to the statute of limitations for ordinary crimes is of deep concern to world public opinion because it prevents those responsible for such crimes from being prosecuted and punished".

The Court of Cassation therefore confirmed that "the principle of  imprescriptibility prevents  a rule of domestic law from enabling an individual convicted of one of these crimes to escape proceedings  on account of time elapsed, whether since the charges concerned or since a _previous conviction, provided, as in the present case, no penalty has been served" (Crim., 3 June 1988, No. ­87-87.240: Bull. No. 246).

Whatever the public or civil nature of the concerned case (Crim., 1  June 1995, No 94-82.590, No 94-82.610 and No 94-82.614: Bull. No  202).

On the other hand, as has been explained, ignoring the principle of imprescriptibility of crimes against humanity, the French courts persist in declaring inadmissible the proceedings brought by the descendants of slaves on the basis of the above-mentioned Act of 21 May 2001.

Thus, the latter are now concretely prevented from taking action against the French State in order to obtain compensation for the damage suffered both by their slave ancestors and by them personally, unlike the victims of other crimes against humanity.

And this in contrast to the victims of the activities and actions committed by the French administration between16 June 1940 and the restoration of republican legality, as it results from the ordinance of 9 August 1944 (see specifically: EC, 12 April 2002, M. Papon, No. 238699; EC, 16 February 2009, Hoffman-Glemane, No. 315499).

22. In view of France's leading role in the establishment and continuation of the slave trade and slavery in Europe, there is no justification for such discrimination. . . . 

Thereof, in addition to being legally unjustifiable, the discrimination suffered by the applicant infringed the particular responsibility incumbent on France in relation to slavery in the light of the historical and geographical circumstances inherent in the present case.

Consequently, and in the light of all the foregoing, the applicant had suffered a violation of Articles 4 and 14 of the Convention, a violation attributable to the respondent State. . . . 

29. In the present case, there is no effective judicial remedy enabling the applicant to obtain compensation for the acts of slavery and the slave trade classified as crimes against humanity on 21 May 2001.

Indeed, purely theoretical, because it considered inadmissible as time barred the proceedings for compensation brought by the descendants of slaves is today emptied of its substance.

As a result, descendants of slaves today have no effective judicial means to claim their rights and to avail themselves of the rights guaranteed by the Convention.

It is also clear that such a remedy could not have been envisaged before the French State, through the law of 21 May 2001, qualified these acts as " crimes against humanity".

By recognizing for the first time the  liability of France and expressly classifying these acts as a 'crime against humanity', this text placed the applicant in a position to act. . . .

Consequently, by not providing any possibility of reparation for acts of slavery, which are systematically held time barred by the French courts, France made it concretely impossible for the applicant to obtain compensation.

There is a blatant violation of Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention.

In response to the French State’s determination NOT to pay reparations, the appellants ask,

“How can one believe that legal proceedings conducted before the French judges appointed by the French state and in solidarity with the latter’s dominant ideology could lead to a condemnation of the French state to repair the damaging consequences of the two crimes? How can we think that a French judge could one day decide to grant the request for reparation when it is obvious that the independence of judges is a fiction and that judges are the docile civil servants of the state, bearers of its interests and protectors of its finances? Can anyone seriously assert that the victims’ heirs acted too late to claim reparation for a crime that is legally imprescriptible? Are those who initiate such actions under the illusion and delusion that there may be a reversal of the French judge’s case law? What is the relevance of continuing the fight on the legal level if the action will be indefinitely confronted with the quasi-ontological resistance of the judge to judge and condemn the crimes committed by his Master?”

For answers to those question’s read MIR’s Why The Battle For Reparations Is Won.

France and The United States Compared

Now compare the French situation with that of the United States. On June 18th, 2009, the 1st Session of the 111th Congress, of which President Joe Biden was a member as a Senator for the state of Delaware, passed S. CON. RES. 26 acknowledging “the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery and Jim Crow laws;” and “apologizes to African-Americans on behalf of the people of the United States, for the wrongs committed against them and their ancestors who suffered under slavery and Jim Crow laws”.

Unfortunately, the same Congressional Resolution demonstrated the hypocrisy of the United States Government on issues of race and equality when it added the following disclaimer to the resolution

“NOTHING IN THIS RESOLUTION— (A) AUTHORIZES OR SUPPORTS ANY CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED STATES; OR (B) SERVES AS A SETTLEMENT OF ANY CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.”

The 1st Amendment of the Constitution of United States of America 1789 (rev. 1992) states very clearly,

“CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF; OR ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, OR OF THE PRESS; OR THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE PEACEABLY TO ASSEMBLE, AND TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES.”

The S. CON. RES. 26 Disclaimer effectively prevents members of the Afrodescendant Nation from exercising their 1st Amendment Right to petition the government for redress of grievances from the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery and Jim Crow laws in the United States.

Moreover, on August 18, 2016, the Report of the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent of its mission to the United States of America, reiterated that

“THE UNITED STATES HAS NOT SIGNED AND RATIFIED ANY OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES THAT WOULD ALLOW UNITED STATES CITIZENS TO PRESENT INDIVIDUAL COMPLAINTS TO THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS TREATY BODIES OR TO THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.”

There is, therefore, no recognition or support by the United States Government for members of the Afrodescendant Nation in the United States of America to exercise their 1st Amendment right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances nor to exercise their human rights under international law to present individual complaints to the United Nations human rights treaty bodies or to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

The Baleka Case: Understanding Ethnocide Against the Balanta People in the United States

Siphiwe Baleka, has, for the first time, has combined genetic testing, family genealogy, domestic and international law to explain exactly how ETHNOCIDE was committed against his family, why the Transgenerational Epigenetic Effects remain and require remedy. It has informed his understanding of the legal status of 1,108 generations of his family up to the present. The case that Siphiwe Baleka has prepared overcomes the reasons for dismissal by both the United States and France. He is now ready to file the case in domestic court and international court but needs the assistance of lawyers and financial help. Lawyers interested in the case should send an email to balantasociety@gmail.com

To donate to the legal and diplomatic work of the Balanta B’urassa History and Genealogy Society in America,

Share

Baba Dr. Wade Ifágbemì Sàngódáre Nobles and Siphiwe Baleka Discuss Transgenerational Epigentic Effects (TGEE) of Slavery and Divine Energy Made Manifest (DEMM)

On Wednesday, November 30, 2022, Baba Dr. Wade Ifágbemì Sàngódáre Nobles and Siphiwe Baleka, along with Enola G Aird, were panelists on a forum entitled Skh (Illumination): Repairing Spirit Damage and Restoring Wellness in the African World. This event was a lead up to the launch of the Permanent Forum on People of African Descent held at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland December 5-8, 2022. 

The following is a conversation between Baba Dr. Wade Ifágbemì Sàngódáre Nobles and Siphiwe Baleka conducted via email on December 1, 2022, the day after the Skh (Illumination). Baba Nobles asked his questions in one email and Siphiwe Baleka answered in another email. For the sake of this post, the questions and answers have been spliced together.

Baba Nobles: Alafia, My Brother Siphiwe Baleka I am not sure if you are en route to Geneva or have arrived. Whatever the case, be well and be safe. The more I hear you speak and review some of your work, eg., COMPLETE STATEMENT TO THE 26TH SESSION OF THE WORKING GROUP OF EXPERTS ON PEOPLE OF AFRICAN DESCENT REGIONAL MEETING WITH CIVIL SOCIETY, the more I am convinced that our on-going conversations will be beneficial. Your thinking  has forced me to recall an earlier (long ago) engagement with Western Psychological theorist, especially Eric Ericson who, if  my recalling is correct, posited the idea that every organism is born with a certain purpose, and continues to develop how it was intended in interrelation with its environment.  Hence, biology unfolds in relation to socio-cultural, environmental (experiential) factors, ergo, the “epigenetic principle.” With these new analyses, science supposedly discovered that such modifications disrupt the normal development and functioning of cells by influencing gene activation, deactivation, etc.  without altering or changing the primary structure of DNA. This is intriguing. However, it is, I believe, bound to the ghost of Aristotle and Descartes’ dilemma, which yokes our intellectual explorations to only “materialist conceptualizations.” Genetics is a study of physical expressions as inheritance.  Even the ideas or thought or affect or feeling are only understood through their physical expressions or evidence. The epigenetic inheritance, as you posit, can be passed down to at least seven generations. The epigenetic tags which react to our environment have cellular memory, which in turn, tell the genes whether to be on or off, to activate, or deactivate. Hence, the idea that our ancestors’ enslavement created epigenetic tags of “fear,” which is being passed down from generation to generation, may need to be expanded. I invite you to ponder additional considerations. Were there epigenetic tags of “courage,” “fearlessness” “etc.? What evidence do we have of these attributes being passed down from generation to generation? Do we have multiple complementary and conflicting tags?  On another level, if African deep thought and wisdom traditions (BaNtu Kongo) suggest that all is spirit and that our beingness is a tri-fold vibrating radiating spirit (energy) that is knowing and knowable, which exist in both the visible and invisible realms, then are there epigenetic tags that are not limited to the physical? 

Siphiwe Baleka: I am inclined to say yes but I have no narrative for how such other worldly epigenetic encoding process works or could work. Perhaps we could coin a phrase? - “multi-versal epigenetic encoding” or “quantum epigenetic encoding”. The more I think about it, a) we have non-intellectual faculties of knowledge that allow communication with the supreme intelligence inside and outside our bodies; b) our perception and thoughts input the epigenetic encoding; c) therefore our perceptions and thoughts from a) do in fact result in b)……

Baba Nobles:  If our “Personhood” exists within “Familyhood” embedded in “Peoplehood,” then would there not be “collective knowing and knowable energy that could create a “force field” that makes the collective more important than the individual? 

Siphiwe Baleka: Yes

Baba Nobles: Is the collective spirit (energy) greater than the individual physical being? What does that suggest for the centrality of inheritance being an individual proposition? 

Siphiwe Baleka: I don’t know. I’m still of the persuasion that direct individual ancestral lineage genetic and epigenetic transmission is dominant. Take a physical example - there’s a reason that a black child resembles it’s black parents rather than Tom Cruise or Paris Hilton ….

Baba Nobles:  If we, the yet-to-be-born and our ancestors are Divine Energy Made Manifest (DEMM) possessing a knowing and knowable spirit, then what intelligent guidance can we receive that is grounded in being DEMM? 

Siphiwe Baleka: This is why I believe that one of the overriding imperatives at this time is establishing a New Afrikan Institute of Mysticism (feel free to replace this word with an Afrikan word/concept) somewhat like the ancient Kemetic Mystery School - where we gather all the living traditional healers and leaders and formulate a curriculum where students are taught inner engineering technologies that allow enhanced communication with the supreme intelligence within and without the body. Such curriculum would include various forms of meditation but also such things as remote viewing, associate remote viewing (seeing into the future) astral projection, telepathy, telekinesis, and other such techniques that have been taught in secret programs in the US and Russia. This is exactly what I proposed at the New Afrikan Thought Conference.

Baba Nobles:  Is our knowing and being knowable limited to only the physical and only in our brains? Finally, can this epigenetic discussion include the Dwellers of Heaven, the invisible ones?

Siphiwe Baleka: No, it is not limited to the physical and the brain although what we do know is the brain plays an important processor of the environmental inputs. But then again, so does the “abdominal brain”. Until I can communicate directly with the cells in my body, I can’t know what capacity my cells have to independently epigenetically encode …. I believe the Dwellers of Heaven and invisible ones are already included in the discussion. How do you think I am able to talk about this? Of course, more skilled spiritual practitioners are needed to understand TGEE in order to ask better questions and receive better answers.

Baba Nobles: Be well and I look forward to hearing about the Geneva discussions.

The Indignity of an African Traveling to Geneva, Switzerland for the Launch of the Permanent Forum of People of African Descent at the United Nations

Siphiwe Baleka Statement to the 1st Session of the UN Permanent Forum on People of African Descent

NCOBRA's Statement to the Permanent Forum on People of African Descent

Baba Dr. Wade Ifágbemì Sàngódáre Nobles

 Co-Founder and Past President (1994-1995), The Association of Black Psychologists

Chair, ABPsi Global Pan African Initiative,

Professor Emeritus, Black Psychology and Africana Studies. San Francisco State University, 

Founding Executive Director (retired), The Institute for the Advanced Study of Black Family Life & Culture, Inc.

Email: DrWNobles@gmail.com

   <www.DrWadeNobles.com>

"A people who do not plan for and take ownership of the future will perish"

"Yesterday is History, Today is a Miracle, Tomorrow is a Mystery"

"History is the Key to Unlocking 

the Mystery of the Miracle"

Brassa Mada aka Siphiwe Baleka

Fouder, Balanta B'urassa History & Genealogy Society in America (BBHAGSIA)

Member, Inclusive Policy Lab of the UNESCO E-team for the People of African Descent and the Sustainable Development Goals

Member, International Civil Society Working Group for the United Nations Permanent Forum of People of African Descent (IWG-PFAD)

Member, NCOBRA International Affairs Commission & Health Commission

Coordinator, #savesoil Guinea Bissau

Coordinator, Lineage Restoration Movement (LRM)

balantasociety@gmail.com

WhatsApp Guinea Bissau +245 956 931 329

Share

NCOBRA's Statement to the Permanent Forum on People of African Descent

for the LIVE UN Web TV recording of the statement (1:21:00 mark of the recording), click

HERE

Statement to the Permanent Forum on People of African Descent 

Geneva, Switzerland 5-8 December 2022

Prepared by

Siphiwe Baleka

N’COBRA Health Commission

PRESENTING NCOBRA’S GROUNDBREAKING REPORT - THE HARM IS TO OUR GENES: TRANSGENERATIONAL EPIGENETIC INHERITANCE AND SYSTEMIC RACISM IN THE UNITED STATES

Madam Chair,

Forum Members,

Great Delegates,

I am Siphiwe Baleka, Founder of the Balanta History and Genealogy Society and member of the NCOBRA Health Commission. In 2021 NCOBRA released its groundbreaking report - The Harm Is To Our Genes: Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance and Systemic Racism in the United States.

As I noted in my presentation to the 26th Session of the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent Regional Meeting with Civil Society, in addition to the social, economic, spiritual, emotional and political damage caused by slavery, we are now beginning to understand the genetic damage that was done.

Simply put, the epigene is an extension of the gene that responds to biochemical signals emanating from the environment. These signals cause changes to the gene and under certain circumstances reprograms the genetics of the cells of the limbic system which is the center of all thought, emotion, behavior, learning and psychosocial pathology. The brutal trauma and dehumanization of the slavery experience has thus damaged the natural genetic makeup of people of African descent that survived slavery. This damage is passed from one generation to the next.

NCOBRA’s Harm Report, which is available at www.officialncobraonline.org explains the science, the harms, and introduces a path towards remedies. NCOBRA recommends that this Forum includes a specific reference to the genetic harm in the Forum’s Declaration regarding reparations and that people of African Descent have a right to their natural genetic status free of mandated artificial genetic alterations from food, medical treatments and emerging nanotechnology.

Abeneh. Thank you.

Share

New! Guinea Bissau Citizenship Update

December 8, 2022 Bissau, Guinea Bissau - Decade of Return Coordinator Daiana Taborda Gomes had a very successful meeting today with Alvis Te, Director de Serviço da Identificação Civil (Director of Civil Identification Services), after having previously met with Djulde Baldé, Conservador dos Registros Centrais (Keeper of Central Records) on December 2 to discuss the naturalisation process and specifically the 23 citizenship applications that the Balanta B’urassa History and Genealogy Society in America processed last year and submitted to the Ministry of Justice through Ben Cunha, Director of Promotions and Marketing at the Ministry of Tourism as part of the Decade of Return Initiative.

According to Mr. Baldé, in accordance with the precedent set by the Ministry of Justice in the naturalisation of Siphiwe Baleka back in April of 2021, the following documents that should instruct this process have been waived: Residence Permit, Declaration of Conformity and Certificate of Residence issued by the Foreigners and Borders of Guinea-Bissau, Criminal Record issued by the Ministry of Justice, Declaration of Good Civic Behavior issued by the Municipal Chamber of Bissau, Declaration of Integration into the Guinean Society issued by the Directorate-General for Culture and Criminal record issued by the competent North American Authorities.

The original fee of 770.482.00 XOF ($1,237.00) has been reduced 50% to 385.241.00 XOF ($618.50).

Today, the Director of Civil Identification Services advised us to write him a letter requesting the total exemption of the expenses for the symbolic and historical aspect of the request. He will report this to the Minister of Justice and will support this request before the Minister sends the files back to the Keeper of Central Records which will validate them. When the Keeper of Central Records has checked the documents, he will send it back to the Director of Civil Identification Services who will forward it to the Minister of Justice for her final opinion and bring the file to the Council of Ministers for inclusion in the agenda and final discussion for approval. Once approved by the Council of Ministers, the applicants will officially be Bissau-Guineans!

At this point, there is another processes for obtaining the passport in which Repat Bissau can complete for each applicant. It was the opinion of the Director of Civil Identification Services that the Decade of Return Coordinators should organize a Citizenship Conferement Ceremony for the 23 applicants which is already being planned for May of 2023. However, it is possible for the 23 applicants to complete the process individually. If you wish to do that, email balantasociety@gmail.com as soon as possible. If you haven’t filed a naturalization application but are interested in obtaining citizenship, complete the form below.

Finally, the Director General recommends that the 23 applicants pay the 50% reduction fee now so that the files can be forwarded to the Keeper of Records to move the process forward and if our request for total exemption is approved, the money will be refunded and/or used for the stay linked to the collective passport delivery ceremony tentatively scheduled for May. Again, if you have completed an application and are ready to pay the fee, email balantasociety@gmail.com for the payment link.

Balanta B’urassa History and Genealogy Society in America Founder and creator of the Decade of Return Initiative, Siphiwe Baleka stated, “This is very good news. The details of the process I started more than a year ago are being revealed and the government is open to the idea of waving all the fees. This is as it should be and acknowledges our special immigration status. It hasn’t been easy, but the aims and objectives of the Decade of Return Initiative are being realized.”

Share

Siphiwe Baleka Statement to the 1st Session of the UN Permanent Forum on People of African Descent

December 6, 2022 - Geneva, Switzerland

Members of the Forum,

Great Delegates

The Trans Atlantic Slave Trafficking was launched by an Apostolic Edict of Pope Nicholas V on June 18, 1452 declaring total war on African people. The Africans that were trafficked across the Atlantic were therefore prisoners of war who were enslaved and completely severed from their ancestral identity. Today, the African Ancestry DNA test enables their descendants to identify which people in Africa they come from, which territory they were taken from, and which language and culture they lost. For the first time in human history, a people are recovering from 9 or more generations of state sanctioned ETHNOCIDE. This is a miracle.

This Ethnocide committed by European colonial powers and their successor states is a crime against humanity that has no statute of limitations and has not been punished nor repaired. How come none of the European nations that held the Asiento monopoly contract with the Catholic Church have been brought before the International Court of Justice, punished and forced to pay reparations? In the latter half of 1964 Malcolm X attempted to bring such a human rights and reparations case against the United States into the World Court, but within months he was assassinated.

The Geneva Convention says that prisoners of war remain so until their final release and repatriation. The Durban Declaration, under section VI, recommends the facilitation of “welcomed return and resettlement of the descendants of enslaved Africans… and urges all states to facilitate all appropriate legal procedures and free legal assistance…” 

Towards that end, we call on this Forum to vigorously request an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on our status as prisoners of war under the Geneva Convention as well as our right to conduct plebiscites for self determination including the right to secede from the jurisdictions of colonial successor states in the Western hemisphere and form our own independent governments. This was a right recognized by President Lincoln’s administration until he was assassinated and the 14th amendment imposed US citizenship against the will and without the consent of the newly emancipated free people of African descent. We need the access to the ICJ that was denied to Malcolm X in order to present these issues for judgment. This is a concrete action, a first step in securing reparation in the form of rematriation to our ancestral motherland and our right to self determination.”

Finally, while I am encouraged by the statements of agency and accomplishment that the establishment of this Forum represents, in the language of my African ancestors from America, “Let’s keep it real!”

We can not end racism so long as the United States Department of Defense (DOD) continues to spend $1.64 Trillion to pursue “full spectrum dominance” on planet earth.

We can not achieve reparations so long as the European Organization for Nuclear Research spends  $9 to $20 billion on the Large Hadron Super Collider right here under the ground in Geneva.

There can be no justice so long as asset managers like Vanguard and Blackrock are allowed to continue to make more than a trillion dollars a year! 

So I don’t want to hear any debates about lack of funding for the forum. If the members of the UN were serious about ending racism and paying reparations, this racist system and its structures can end TODAY and the money and resources needed for people of African descent can be transferred TODAY.

Share

THE PERMANENT FORUM ON PEOPLE OF AFRICAN DESCENT, THE DURBAN DECLARATION, REPATRIATION AND PLEBISCITE FOR SELF DETERMINATION

On November 18, 2104, The United Nations General Assembly decided, in its resolution 69/16 entitled "Programme of activities for the implementation of the International Decade for People of African Descent" to establish  a Permanent Forum of People of African Descent.

On August 2, 2021, the United Nations General Assembly adopted its resolution 75/314, in which it formally operationalized the Permanent Forum as 

"a consultative mechanism for people of African descent and other relevant stakeholders as a platform for improving the safety and quality of life and livelihoods of people of African descent, as well as an advisory body to the Human Rights Council, in line with the programme of activities for the implementation of the International Decade for People of African Descent and in close coordination with existing mechanisms".

The first session of the Permanent Forum on People of African Descent (PFPAD) will be held from 5 to 8 December 2022, in Geneva, Switzerland. 

Siphiwe Baleka, as President of the Balanta B’urassa History & Genealogy Society in America (BBHAGSIA) and as a member of the International Civil Society Working Group (ICSWG) of PFPAD, has been invited by Yury Boychenko, Chief at the Anti-Racial Discrimination Section, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, to attend the first session of PFPAD.

Background

Resolution 69/16 that establishes PFPAD, states,

Recalling further its resolution 52/111 of 12 December 1997, by which it decided to convene the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, and its resolutions 56/266 of 27 March 2002, 57/195 of 18 December 2002, 58/160 of 22 December 2003, 59/177 of 20 December 2004 and 60/144 of 16 December 2005, which guided the comprehensive follow-up to the World Conference and the effective implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, . . .

Committed to upholding human dignity and equality for the victims of slavery, the slave trade and colonialism, in particular people of African descent in the African diaspora

Welcoming the work undertaken by the Intergovernmental Working Group on the Effective Implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action on the elaboration of a draft programme of activities for the implementation of the International Decade for People of African Descent, . . .

I. Introduction 

A. Background 

1. The International Decade for People of African Descent, to be observed from 2015 to 2024, constitutes an auspicious period of history when the United Nations, Member States, civil society and all other relevant actors will join together with people of African descent and take effective measures for the implementation of the programme of activities in the spirit of recognition, justice and development. The programme of activities recognizes that the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action is a comprehensive United Nations framework and a solid foundation for combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, and represents a new stage in the efforts of the United Nations and the international community to restore the rights and dignity of people of African descent. 

2. The implementation of the programme of activities for the International Decade is an integral part of the full and effective implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action and in compliance with the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination as the principal international instruments for the elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. Important synergies should therefore be achieved through the International Decade in the fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.

3. The Durban Declaration and Programme of Action acknowledged that people of African descent were victims of slavery, the slave trade and colonialism, and continue to be victims of their consequences. The Durban process raised the visibility of people of African descent and contributed to a substantive advancement in the promotion and protection of their rights as a result of concrete actions taken by States, the United Nations, other international and regional bodies and civil society. 

4. Regrettably, despite the above-mentioned advances, racism and racial discrimination, both direct and indirect, de facto and de jure, continue to manifest themselves in inequality and disadvantage. People of African descent throughout the world, whether as descendants of the victims of the transatlantic slave trade or as more recent migrants, constitute some of the poorest and most marginalized groups. Studies and findings by international and national bodies demonstrate that people of African descent still have limited access to quality education, health services, housing and social security. In many cases, their situation remains largely invisible, and insufficient recognition and respect has been given to the efforts of people of African descent to seek redress for their present condition. They all too often experience discrimination in their access to justice, and face alarmingly high rates of police violence, together with racial profiling. Furthermore, their degree of political participation is often low, both in voting and in occupying political positions. . . . 

C. Objectives of the International Decade 

8. Non-discrimination and equality before and of the law constitute fundamental principles of international human rights law, and underpin the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the main international human rights treaties and instruments. As such, the main objective of the International Decade should be to promote respect, protection and fulfillment of all human rights and fundamental freedoms by people of African descent, as recognized in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. This main objective can be achieved through the full and effective implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, the outcome document of the Durban Review Conference and the political declaration commemorating the tenth anniversary of the adoption of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, and through the universal accession to or ratification of and full implementation of the obligations arising under the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and other relevant international and regional human rights instruments.

Therefore, a thorough review of the Durban Declaration, its implementation, and other relevant international and regional human rights instruments is required to make an effective intervention at PFPAD. Below is such a review for the benefit of Balanta descendants in the United States, conscious citizens of the Republic of New Afrika, and Afro Descendant people commonly referred to as the “African Diaspora” that are descended from people that were captured and trafficked across the Atlantic ocean as prisoners of war and enslaved in the Americas and Caribbean.

REVIEW

As acknowledged in my Statement to the 20th session of the Intergovernmental Working Group on the Effective Implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action Geneva, Switzerland 10-21 October 2022 which is also posted on PFPAD’s website,

“The process of liberation is irresistible and irreversible, and its impediment by foreign domination constitutes a denial of fundamental human rights.”

Moreover, both the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) clearly state,

“Recognizing that, in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ideal of free human beings  enjoying freedom from fear and want can only be achieved if conditions are created whereby everyone may enjoy his economic, social and cultural rights, as well as his civil and political rights, . . .

International law has thus determined that the rights of people of African descent are human rights; they are indivisible and interdependent. Civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights cannot be realized in isolation from each other. 

POLITICAL RIGHTS: SELF DETERMINATION

Full political rights include the right of self determination. The Declaration of Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation Among States stipulates that the creation of a sovereign and independent State, or the acquisition of any other freely decided political status, are all means through which people can exercise the right to self-determination. Since 1863, the time of the Emancipation Proclamation in the United States of America, 151 new independent nations have been established. 

Unfortunately, since the assassination of President Lincoln, knowledge of the full political rights in international law has been kept from African Americans through official state-sanctioned conspiracy of the United States government. This was brought to the attention of PFPAD in my statement.

At the close of the American Civil War in 1865, the United States Government recognized the inalienable (human) rights of the new class of free men - namely the right to seek admission, as citizens, to the American community; the right to return home, to Africa; the right to general emigration and the right to set up an independent State of its own. New Afrikans were given possessory title to territories and set up New Afrikan self-governing colonies under the protection of the United States military. 

Congress responded to President Lincoln’s recommendation in separate acts, providing in an act, April 16, 1862, for the release of certain persons held to service or labor in the District of Columbia, including those to be liberated by the act, as may desire to emigrate to the Republic of Hayti or Liberia, or such other country beyond the limits of the United States, as the President may determine, provided the expenditure does not exceed $100 ($2,589.92 in 2021) for each immigrant. The act provided that the sum of $100,000 ($3.15 million in 2021) out of any money in the Treasury should be expended under the direction of the President to aid the right of return of such persons of African descent then residing in the District of Columbia. It further provided that later, on July 16, an additional appropriation of $500,000 ($15.8 million in 2021) should be used in securing the right of return of free persons to the African continent. A resolution directly authorizing the President’s participation provided “that the President is hereby authorized to make provision for the transportation, colonization and settlement in some tropical country beyond the limits of the United States, of such persons of the African race, made free by the provisions of this act, as may be willing to emigrate, having first obtained the consent of the government of said country to their protection and settlement within the same, with all the rights and privileges of freemen.”

On January 12, 1865 the United States Secretary of War Edwin McMasters Stanton and United States Army General William Tecumseh Sherman met in Savannah, Georgia with a New Afrikan government council of twenty people representing the new class of free persons. In response to General Sherman’s Fourth request to “State in what manner you would rather live - whether scattered among the whites or in colonies by yourselves, the spokesperson for the black Government council, Garrison Frazier answered: “I would prefer to live by ourselves, for there is prejudice against us in the South that will take years to get over; but I do not know that I can answer for my brethren.” The record shows that Mr. Lynch said he thinks they should not be separated but live together. All the other persons present, being questioned one by one, answer that they agree with Brother Frazier. As a result of these negotiations, the closest thing that New Afrikans had to a plebiscite to determine their will and aspirations as free men, General Sherman issued Special Field Order Number 15. As noted by Imari Obadele,

"General Sherman issued his Special Field Order Number 15, dated 16 January 1865. This order set aside for the new class of free people “the islands from Charleston south, the abandoned rice fields along the rivers for 30 miles back from the seas and the country bordering St. Johns River, Florida.” The order further said “. . .  in the possession of which land the military authorities will afford them protection until such time as they can protect themselves or until congress shall regulate their title.” Further, in accordance with the negotiating position of this Savannah-based Southeast Coast New African Government, General Sherman’s Order also provided that “on the islands and in the settlements hereafter to be established, no white persons whatever, unless military officers and soldiers detailed for duty, will be permitted to reside; and the sole and exclusive management of affairs will be left to the free people themselves, subject only to the United States military authority and the acts of Congress.” Forty-thousand members of the new class were settled under this order. Here, then, was the establishment of self-governing New African communities under the protection of the United States on land to which the Americans claimed ultimate title but to which the New Africans had been given possessory title by General Sherman, acting lawfully for the Congress and the President.

Similar centers of the New African nation under New African Governments were established in Mississippi. Captain John Eaton, named Superintendent of Negro Affairs by General Ulysses Grant in 1862, had, by July 1864, settled 72,500 members of the new class “in cities on plantations and in freedman’s villages,” almost all of whom, Superintendent Eaton reported, were ‘entirely self-supporting.’ Davis Bend, Mississippi was occupied by the Union Army in December 1864. Here a New African government was established with all the property under its control and with districts under New African sheriffs and judges and other officers. Again, as on the east Coast, the center of New African Government in Mississippi remained under the protection of the United States Army and ultimately subject to United States law, like many of the Indian nations. But also, like the East Coast centers of the New African nation, these communities were established on land that was in territorial status, and they were composed of persons who, like the residents of the Thirteen Colonies, possessed the inalienable right to liberty. 

In his first message to Congress in December 1865, United States President Andrew Johnson conceded the right of the new class to general emigration, including necessarily the right to return home, to Africa. Said President Johnson: “While their right to voluntary migration and expatriation is not to be questioned, I would not advise their forced removal and colonization.”

Thus, by word and action, did the American government recognize the fledgling New African nation and the right of the new class, in exercise of its inherent liberty, to both repatriation and to independent Statehood. 

After the assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, the American community - reacting to its own need for black labor and reacting to what it believed to be a difficult logistical problem in repatriation and reacting to a fear of increased political power for the Confederates - determined to limit the liberty of the new class of men, in the political arena, to the single option of the United States citizenship. The Fourteenth Amendment, passed by Congress in June 1866 and ratified by the States in July 1868, was, then, the consecration of a campaign of war and fraud by the American community against New Afrikans, that wrongfully and illegally prevented the new class from exercising the full range of political liberty that belonged to it. It imposed citizenship on New Afrikans without their consent. The perpetuation of this imposition is a violation of New Afrikan people’s human rights.

Full political rights include seceding from the United States and forming a new, independent New Afrikan nation on land within the current jurisdiction of the United States, as well as voluntary return to the various lands of our origin. Below are the relevant sections (with commentary) of the Durban Declaration supporting our claim and intervention at PFPAD.

World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance: Durban Declaration 

“52. We note with concern that, among other factors, racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance contribute to forced displacement and the movement of people from their countries of origin as refugees and asylum-seekers;” 

Commentary: On June 18, 1452 Pope Nicholas V issued the Dum Diversas Papal Bull (apostolic edict)  announcing total war on people of African descent which inaugurated the trans Atlantic slave trade and the forced displacement of people of African descent from their countries of origin to the Americas and thenCaribbean.

“54. We underline the urgency of addressing the root causes of displacement and of finding durable solutions for refugees and displaced persons, in particular voluntary return in safety and dignity to the countries of origin, as well as resettlement in third countries and local integration, when and where appropriate and feasible;”

Commentary: Voluntary return to the various African countries from which we originated is an urgent matter requiring specific immigration and naturalization laws and programmes in each of the member states of the African Union. It should be noted that, United States v The Libelants and Claimants of the Schooner Amistad - 1841 makes clear that

“it is admitted that the African . . . owe no allegiance to (any Nations laws) their rights are to be determined by the law which is of universal obligation - the law of nature. . . a former domicile is not abandoned by residence in another if that residence be not voluntarily chosen. Those who are in exile, or in prison, as they are never presumed to have abandoned all hope of return, retain their former domicile. That these victims of fraud and piracy - husbands torn from their wives and families - children from their parents and kindred - neither intended to abandon the land or their nativity, nor had lost all hope of recovering it, sufficiently appears from the facts on this record.”

Never in the history of enslavement and after emancipation did the people ever give up hope of returning to their ancestral homelands. This desire was encoded in the slave songs from 1792 to 1861 and afterwards by the various documented repatriation movements that continue up to today in the current “Blaxit” and “Decade of Return” Initiatives.

“55. We affirm our commitment to respect and implement humanitarian obligations relating to the protection of refugees, asylum-seekers, returnees and internally displaced persons, and note in this regard the importance of international solidarity, burden-sharing and international cooperation to share responsibility for the protection of refugees, reaffirming that the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol remain the foundation of the international refugee regime and recognizing the importance of their full application by States parties;” 

Commentary: the responsibility and burden of repatriation rests on international solidarity and cooperation.

“79. We firmly believe that the obstacles to overcoming racial discrimination and achieving racial equality mainly lie in the lack of political will, weak legislation and lack of implementation strategies and concrete action by States, as well as the prevalence of racist attitudes and negative stereotyping;”  

Commentary: states are to blame for the absence of a large-scale, back to Africa movement and justice requires that states implement concrete actions supporting the right of return of people of African descent remaining in the land of their ancestors’ captivity and enslavement.

“80. We firmly believe that education, development and the faithful implementation of all international human rights norms and obligations, including enactment of laws and political, social and economic policies, are crucial to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;”

Commentary: African states must create distinct immigration status and policies for people of African descent who exercise their right of return to the land of their origin from which they were forcefully displaced and enslaved. The Durban Declaration declared slavery and the trans-Atlantic slave trade a “crime against humanity” that has no statute of limitation. We are not returning simply as foreigners, tourists, or business investors and thus such current naturalization laws, policies and programs are inadequate for our needs. 

“81. We recognize that democracy, transparent, responsible, accountable and participatory governance responsive to the needs and aspirations of the people, and respect for human rights, fundamental freedoms and the rule of law are essential for the effective prevention and elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. We reaffirm that any form of impunity for crimes motivated by racist and xenophobic attitudes plays a role in weakening the rule of law and democracy and tends to encourage the recurrence of such acts;”

Commentary: as of yet, none of the states or institutions that were involved in the trans-Atlantic slave trade crime against humanity have been punished or forced to pay reparations.

“86. We recall that the dissemination of all ideas based upon racial superiority or hatred shall be declared an offence punishable by law with due regard to the principles embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the rights expressly set forth in article 5 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD);

Commentary: as of yet, none of the states or institutions that were involved in the trans Atlantic slave trade crime against humanity have been punished or forced to pay reparations. However, on August 30, 2022, the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) released its review of U.S. compliance with the CERD treaty and, for the first time, called on the U.S. government to begin the process of providing reparations to descendants of enslaved people. No state has yet initiated a case at the International Court of Justice or other world court against the nations that held the Asiento contracts with the Catholic Church that gave those nations the exclusive monopoly rights to the trade under Catholic ecclesiastical law and European law which represents state-sanctioned crimes against humanity. What can PFPAD do to ensure that this happens?

“103. We recognize the consequences of past and contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance as serious challenges to global peace and security, human dignity and the realization of human rights and fundamental freedoms of many people in the world, in particular Africans, people of African descent, people of Asian descent and indigenous peoples;” 

Commentary: since economic, social, cultural civil and political rights are inseparable, indivisible, interdependent and required for full human dignity, and political rights include the right to self determination and control of one’s political destiny, and since this pursuit is both irresistible and irreversible, therefore a plebiscite for New Afrikan self determination is a fundamental feature for overcoming the past consequences of slavery and the current consequences of racism in the United States. Without the ability to establish our own state, we can not experience the full measure of dignity and realization of our human rights. This needs to be formally acknowledge and stated by the United Nations.

“104. We also strongly reaffirm as a pressing requirement of justice that victims of human rights violations resulting from racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, especially in the light of their vulnerable situation socially, culturally and economically, should be assured of having access to justice, including legal assistance where appropriate, and effective and appropriate protection and remedies, including the right to seek just and adequate reparation or satisfaction for any damage suffered as a result of such discrimination, as enshrined in numerous international and regional human rights instruments, in particular the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination;

Commentary: PFPAD should be instrumental in helping bring cases for reparations and plebiscites before the ICC/ICJ and other human rights institutions. Article 7 (1) of the Rome Statute defines the following intangible culture-related crimes against humanity: "Enslavement; Deportation or forcible transfer of population; Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity; Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court; The crime of apartheid."; Article 8 (2) defines the following intangible culture-related war crimes: "Committing outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment; . . . Unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement; The transfer, directly or indirectly, by the Occupying Power of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies, or the deportation or transfer of all or parts of the population of the occupied territory within or outside of this territory; Ordering the displacement of the civilian population for reasons related to the conflict, unless the security of the civilians involved or imperative military reasons so demand." UN Charter Article 96 states: 

1. The General Assembly or the Security Council may request the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion on any legal question

2. Other organs of the United Nations and specialized agencies, which may at any time be so authorized by the General Assembly, may also request advisory opinions of the Court on legal questions arising within the scope of their activities.

Programme of Action 

II. Victims of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance 

“4. Urges States to facilitate the participation of people of African descent in all political, economic, social and cultural aspects of society and in the advancement and economic development of their countries, and to promote a greater knowledge of and respect for their heritage and culture; 

6. Calls upon the United Nations, international financial and development institutions and other appropriate international mechanisms to develop capacity-building programmes intended for Africans and people of African descent in the Americas and around the world; 

8. Urges financial and development institutions and the operational programmes and specialized agencies of the United Nations, in accordance with their regular budgets and the procedures of their governing bodies: (a) To assign particular priority, and allocate sufficient funding, within their areas of competence and budgets, to improving the situation of Africans and people of African descent, while devoting special attention to the needs of these populations in developing countries, inter alia through the preparation of specific programmes of action;”

Commentary: here is a demand for the PFPAD to work with the The Peacebuilding Support Office (PBSO) within the Department of Political and Peacebuilding Affairs (DPPA), and the Special Committee on Decolonization (C-24) to help the various Afro Descendant peoples throughout the Americas and the Caribbean, to develop the capacity to exercise their political rights through self determination plebiscites conducted in North, South and Central America and the Caribbean.. Article 21.1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “3. The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government;”

“11. Encourages States to identify factors which prevent equal access to, and the equitable presence of, people of African descent at all levels of the public sector, including the public service, and in particular the administration of justice, and to take appropriate measures to remove the obstacles identified and also to encourage the private sector to promote equal access to, and the equitable presence of, people of African descent at all levels within their organizations;

12. Calls upon States to take specific steps to ensure full and effective access to the justice system for all individuals, particularly those of African descent;

Commentary: on August 18, 2016, the Report of the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent of its mission to the United States of America, reiterated that

“THE UNITED STATES HAS NOT SIGNED AND RATIFIED ANY OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES THAT WOULD ALLOW UNITED STATES CITIZENS TO PRESENT INDIVIDUAL COMPLAINTS TO THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS TREATY BODIES OR TO THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.”

“13. Urges States, in accordance with international human rights standards and their respective domestic legal framework, to resolve problems of ownership of ancestral lands inhabited for generations by people of African descent and to promote the productive utilization of land and the comprehensive development of these communities, respecting their culture and their specific forms of decision-making; “

Commentary: The Inter American Commission for Human Rights (IACHR), pursuant to the principle of equality and non discrimination and following the decisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR), have asserted  that “African Descent communities must enjoy the same territorial rights that have been granted to indigenous  peoples, because the notion of territoriality not only addresses the element of ancestral tie but is also linked to  the construct of culturally identifying with the territory and its natural resources. This also means that to African  Descent communities the geographic surroundings are a space of recognition of the diaspora, which helps them  preserve cultural traditions and conserve their historical legacy.”

Indigenous peoples 

“19. Recommends that States examine, in conformity with relevant international human rights instruments, norms and standards, their Constitutions, laws, legal systems and policies in order to identify and eradicate racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance towards indigenous peoples and individuals, whether implicit, explicit or inherent;”

Commentary: It is noted that  The Permanent Forum of People of African Descent (PFPAD) submitted a proposal that emphasizes the  importance of incorporating the concept of peoples of African descent in order to recognize the collective. The legal recognition of peoples of African descent in the Americas is strongly rooted in the International Labour Organization Convention 169 (ILO Convention 169), the decisions of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) on cases of Tribal communities that are of African descent, as well as in reports of the Inter-American Commission of Human  Rights (IACHR).   

The Convention on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the International Labour Organization 169 (ILO Convention  169) uses the concept “Indigenous and tribal peoples” as a “common denominator for a diversity of peoples that  have their own cultures, languages, customs and institutions, which distinguish them from other parts of the  societies in which they find themselves.” The term “Tribal Peoples” has been  used in the Americas, to recognize persons of African descent because it is the category of international human rights law that has enabled recognition of rights to collective property, according to the provisions of the Convention on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples of the International Labour Organization (ILO) 169. Peoples of African descent have used the concept “tribal” of the ILO Convention 169 to achieve recognition of their  histories, institutions, territories, practices and culture as collective subjects. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights has accepted the claim of a tribal identity for communities of African descent in multiple cases  and has recognized collective rights for those communities, as well as a common history related to the  transatlantic trade.

Ratification of and effective implementation of relevant international and regional legal instruments on human rights and non-discrimination

“77. Urges States that have not yet done so to consider becoming parties to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, as well as to consider acceding to the Optional Protocols to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;”

Commentary: On August 18, 2016, the Report of the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent of its mission to the United States of America, reiterated that, “the United States has not signed and ratified any of the human rights treaties that would allow United States citizens to present individual complaints to the United Nations Human Rights treaty bodies or to the Inter American Court of Human Rights. In September 1992, the United States ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The covenant protects the right to self-determination, the right to non-discrimination, the right to remedy, and the rights of minorities. 

“78. Urges those States that have not yet done so to consider signing and ratifying or acceding to the following instruments: 

(a) Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948;

(l) The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court of 1998;”

Commentary: the 1949 Geneva Convention Article 4 (1) defines prisoners of war and Article 5 states, 

“the present Convention shall apply to the persons referred to in Article 4 from the time they fall into the power of the enemy and until their final release and repatriation.” 

The new Geneva Convention Protocol on Prisoners of War, which the United States has signed but not yet ratified and which went into force for some states on 7 December 1978, has provided in Articles 43 through 47 broader standards for prisoners of war, who come from irregular and guerilla units, than the terms of the 1949 Article 4. Article 45 of the 1978 Protocol states that a

“A person who takes part in hostilities and falls into the power of an adverse Party shall be presumed to be a prisoner of war… if he claims the status of war, or if he appears to be entitled to such status, or if the party on which he depends claims such status on his behalf.

The African Diaspora, referred to as “Afrodescendents” has been determined by a competent tribunal -- the Third World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance in the city of Santiago, Chile in the year 2000 - and confirmed in 2002 at the United Nations Conference for the Rights of Minorities in La Ceiba, Honduras to refer to the African Diaspora that  

  • Were forcibly disposed of their homeland, Africa;

  • Were transported to the Americas and Slavery Diaspora for the purpose of enslavement;

  • Were subjected to slavery;

  • Were subjected to forced mixed breeding and rape;

  • Have experienced, through force, the loss of mother tongue, culture, and religion;

  • Have experienced racial discrimination due to lost ties from their original identity.

Thus, the designation or status of “prisoner of war” under the Geneva Convention is valid for Afrodescendants since they have yet to be repatriated to their land of origin.

Prosecution of perpetrators of racist acts 

“84. Urges States to adopt effective measures to combat criminal acts motivated by racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, to take measures so that such motivations are considered an aggravating factor for the purposes of sentencing, to prevent these crimes from going unpunished and to ensure the rule of law;”

Commentary: starting with the first and defining act which was the Dum Diversas Papal Bull declaring total war against African people. In this respect, a PRESENTMENT TO THE HOLY SEE IN FURTHERANCE OF REPARATIONS was delivered at the Vatican on July 18, 2022.

“87. Urges States parties to adopt legislation implementing the obligations they have assumed to prosecute and punish persons who have committed or ordered to be committed grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and Additional Protocol I thereto and of other serious violations of the laws and customs of war, in particular in relation to the principle of non-discrimination;”

Commentary: on the 47th Anniversary of the Independence of Guinea Bissau, as President of the Balanta B’urassa History and Genealogy Society in America, I, notified United States Secretary of State Michael Pompeo that,

the liberation and independence of the people of Guinea Bissau is not yet complete. The Balanta, Fulani, Mandinga, Papel, Manjaco, Beafada, Mancanha, Bijago, Felupe, Mansoaca, and others who were taken to the Americas - North, South and Central - as well as the Caribbean, are still living under foreign domination in the lands of their captivity and enslavement. . . . We invite the United States Government to do its part to complete the liberation and independence of Guinea Bissau by negotiating with us and the Government of Guinea Bissau, a peaceful Reparations and Repatriation treaty  that would provide the justice due to the Balanta, Fulani, Mandinga, Papel, Manjaco, Beafada, Mancanha, Bijago, Felupe, and Mansoaca people in America who have yet to be returned to their independent homeland.”

We invite each African Union member state to also initiate negotiations with the Holy See (Catholic Church), and with the governments of the European powers that engaged in the trans-Atlantic slave trade as well as the government of the nations in North, South and Central America and the Caribbean.

Establishment and reinforcement of independent specialized national institutions and mediation 

“90. Urges States, as appropriate, to establish, strengthen, review and reinforce the effectiveness of independent national human rights institutions, particularly on issues of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, in conformity with the Principles relating to the status of national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights, annexed to General Assembly resolution 48/134 of 20 December 1993, and to provide them with adequate financial resources, competence and capacity for investigation, research, education and public awareness activities to combat these phenomena;”

Commentary: The REPORT OF THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS COMPILATION ON THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  recommended that the United States “establish a high-level inter-agency working group (United States Working Group on Human Rights) with a mandate to oversee and coordinate the implementation of the international human rights obligations of the United States domestically.”

Subsequently, the AFRO DESCENDANTS' RESPONSE TO PRESIDENT BIDEN'S EXECUTIVE ORDER ON ADVANCING RACIAL EQUITY AND SUPPORT FOR UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES THROUGH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT made the following recommendations:

1. The proposed United States Working Group on Human Rights to submit to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a report within 200 days on legal reform to benefit the Afro Descendant Nation’s ability to exercise its human rights.

2. The report shall include a plan to assist the Afro Descendant Nation’s request to the UN Decolonization Committee to list us on the Decolonization List made in October 2018.

3. The report shall include a plan for conducting a UNITED NATIONS SPONSORED PLEBISCITE FOR SELF-DETERMINATION FOR DESCENDANTS OF PEOPLE WHO SURVIVED THE CRIMINAL AND GENOCIDAL MIDDLE PASSAGE TO THE COLONIES THAT BECAME THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

2. Policies and practices 

Data collection and disaggregation, research and study

“96. Invites States to promote and conduct studies and adopt an integral, objective and long-term approach to all phases and aspects of migration which will deal effectively with both its causes and manifestations. These studies and approaches should pay special attention to the root causes of migratory flows, such as lack of full enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the effects of economic globalization on migration trends;”

Commentary: there is a new “Blaxit” movement of people of African descent in the United States particularly that are migrating from America due to economic, social, and political pressures inflamed by random acts of violence, police murder and brutality, racism, and right-wing facism. This has coincided with efforts made to obtain citizenship in African countries. This represents a new African refugee and migration phenomenon that needs to be addressed.

“IV. Provision of effective remedies, recourse, redress, and other measures at the national, regional and international levels

158. Recognizes that these historical injustices have undeniably contributed to the poverty, underdevelopment, marginalization, social exclusion, economic disparities, instability and insecurity that affect many people in different parts of the world, in particular in developing countries. The Conference recognizes the need to develop programmes for the social and economic development of these societies and the Diaspora, within the framework of a new partnership based on the spirit of solidarity and mutual respect, in the following areas:

Facilitation of welcomed return and resettlement of the descendants of enslaved Africans;

160. Urges States to take all necessary measures to address, as a matter of urgency, the pressing requirement for justice for the victims of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and to ensure that victims have full access to information, support, effective protection and national, administrative and judicial remedies, including the right to seek just and adequate reparation or satisfaction for damage, as well as legal assistance, where required;

161. Urges States to facilitate for victims of racial discrimination, including victims of torture and ill-treatment, access to all appropriate legal procedures and free legal assistance in a manner adapted to their specific needs and vulnerability, including through legal representation; 

162. Urges States to ensure the protection against victimization of complainants and witnesses of acts of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, and to consider measures such as, where appropriate, making legal assistance, including legal aid, available to complainants seeking a legal remedy and, if possible, affording the possibility for non-governmental organizations to support complainants of racism, with their consent, in legal procedures;”

Commentary: at the the 31st Session of the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent, December 1, 2022 I made a presentation that requested WGEPAD and PFPAD provide advice and assistance in requesting the International Court of Justice to issue a special advisory opinion on our status under the Geneva Convention as well as a special advisory opinion on our collective political rights that were recognized by the Lincoln Administration in 1865 i.e. the right to statehood, the right to repatriation/rematriation, and the right to integration into American society but denied after President Lincoln’s assassination.

National legislation and programmes

Remedies, reparations, compensation 

“166. Urges States to adopt the necessary measures, as provided by national law, to ensure the right of victims to seek just and adequate reparation and satisfaction to redress acts of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, and to design effective measures to prevent the repetition of such acts;”

Commentary: On June 18th, 2009, the 1st Session of the 111th Congress, of which President Joe Biden was a member as a Senator for the state of Delaware, passed S. CON. RES. 26 acknowledging

“the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery and Jim Crow laws;” and “apologizes to African-Americans on behalf of the people of the United States, for the wrongs committed against them and their ancestors who suffered under slavery and Jim Crow laws”.

Unfortunately, the same Congressional Resolution demonstrated the hypocrisy of the United States Government on issues of race and equality when it added the following disclaimer to the resolution

“NOTHING IN THIS RESOLUTION— (A) AUTHORIZES OR SUPPORTS ANY CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED STATES; OR (B) SERVES AS A SETTLEMENT OF ANY CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED STATES.”

The 1st Amendment of the Constitution of United States of America 1789 (rev. 1992) states very clearly,

“CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF; OR ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, OR OF THE PRESS; OR THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE PEACEABLY TO ASSEMBLE, AND TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES.”

The S. CON. RES. 26 Disclaimer effectively prevents members of the Afrodescendant Nation from exercising their 1st Amendment Right to petition the government for redress of grievances from the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery and Jim Crow laws in the United States. This must be challenged and condemned as a human rights violation.

V. Strategies to achieve full and effective equality, including international cooperation and enhancement of the United Nations and other international mechanisms in combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and follow-up

“168. Urges States that have not yet done so to consider acceding to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and their two Additional Protocols of 1977, as well as to other treaties of international humanitarian law, and to enact, with the highest priority, appropriate legislation, taking the measures required to give full effect to their obligations under international humanitarian law, in particular in relation to the rules prohibiting discrimination;

172. Urges States to protect the national or ethnic, cultural, religious and linguistic identity of minorities within their respective territories and to develop appropriate legislative and other measures to encourage conditions for the promotion of that identity, in order to protect them from any form of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. In this context, forms of multiple discrimination should be fully taken into account;”

173. Further urges States to ensure the equal protection and promotion of the identities of the historically disadvantaged communities in those unique circumstances where this may be appropriate; “

Commentary: with the advent of the maternal and paternal African Ancestry dna test, it is now possible to identify the ancestral lineages of people who suffered ethnocide as a resulted of the trans-Atlantic slave trade. Consequently, recovery from ethnocide is now possible and it is the states’ obligations to provide all the programs necessary to restore the ancestral lineages, identities, languages, cultures and territories of the various African ethnicities that would constitute national ethnic minorities. For example, the descendants of the Balanta people in the United States, Colombia, etc.; the Temne and Mende descendants in Jamaica, the United States, Barbados, etc. This would include establishing self-governing, autonomous ethnic territories within national jurisdictions. For example, in the United States, there are 566 federally recognized American Indian and Alaskan Native Tribes and 326 Indian land areas in the U.S. administered as federal Indian reservations. Approximately 750,000 people have taken the African Ancestry dna test. The test also identifies the ancestry of family members of the test takers, so that between 5 and 10 million people in the United States could identify their maternal and/or paternal African Ancestry. Land areas need to be set aside where school systems could teach and conduct classes in the ancestral languages and where specific programs aimed at the specific cultural repair could be implemented.

Regional/international cooperation

“191. (a) Calls upon States to elaborate action plans in consultation with national human rights institutions, other institutions created by law to combat racism, and civil society and to provide the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights with such action plans and other relevant materials on the measures undertaken in order to implement provisions of the present Declaration and the Programme of Action.”

CONCLUSION

A valid and legitimate question is: What is our status under international law? Are we citizens of the United States by virtue of the imposition of the 14th Amendment, are we national minorities, are we prisoners of war, are we stateless, are we indigenous tribal people? What, exactly, are we? The immediate follow-up question is, How was/is this status determined? An honest assessment of the second question will show that any such status was obtained without the informed consent of our people and thus, invalidates the answer to the first question and finally provokes the recognition that our people themselves must determine their status through the exercise of free choice. This is the rational basis for the plebiscite. PFPAD can request that the ICJ make an advisory judgment on our status.

The essential strategy of our struggle for land is to array enough power ( as in jiu-jitsu, with a concentration of karate strength at key moments) to force the greatest power, the United States, to abide by international law, to recognize and accept our claims to independence and land.”

- Imari Obadele, Provisional Government of the Republic of New Afrika 

  1. List of National Independence: 1945-1960

August 15, 1945: North Korea

August 15, 1945: South Korea

August 17, 1945: Indonesia

September 2, 1945: Vietnam

April 17, 1946: Syria

May 25, 1946: Jordan

August 14, 1947: Pakistan

August 15, 1947: India

January 4, 1948: Burma

February 4, 1948: Sri Lanka

May 14, 1948: Israel

July 19, 1949: Laos

August 8, 1949: Bhutan

December 24, 1951: Libya

November 9, 1953: Cambodia

January 1, 1956: Sudan

March 2, 1956: Morocco

March 20, 1956: Tunisia

March 6, 1957: Ghana

August 31, 1957: Malaysia

October 2, 1958: Guinea

January 1, 1960: Cameroon

April 4, 1960: Senegal

May 27, 1960: Togo

June 30, 1960: Republic of the Congo

July 1, 1960: Somalia

July 26, 1960: Madagascar

August 1, 1960: Benin

August 3, 1960: Niger

August 5, 1960: Burkina Faso

August 7, 1960: Côte d'Ivoire

August 11, 1960: Chad

August 13, 1960: Central African Republic

August 15, 1960: Democratic Republic of the Congo

August 16, 1960: Cyprus

August 17, 1960: Gabon

September 22, 1960: Mali

October 1, 1960: Nigeria

November 28, 1960: Mauritania

Share