ARE BLACK PEOPLE IN AMERICA STILL PRISONERS OF WAR IF THEY HAVE VOTED?

On June 18, 1452, Pope Nicholas the V issued the Dum Diversas Apostolic Edict declaring war on the people living on the African continent. This initiated the invasions and warfare that resulte in 12 million people being enslaved in the Americas. The trafficking of these prisoners of war was deliberately called the “Trans Atlantic Slave Trade” in order to disguise it as a matter of commerce and not warfare. Rather then admit that prisoners of war were being trafficked and enslaved, they created the narrative that slaves were being bought and sold as new products using the trademarks “slaves”, “negroes”, and “blacks”. The truth is, they were prisoners of war!

The 1949 Geneva Convention: Article 4 (1) defines prisoners of war and Article 5 states, “the present Convention shall apply to the persons referred to in Article 4 from the time they fall into the power of the enemy and

until their final release and repatriation

Now ask yourself: have you been released from alien domination? Do you still live in the territory and jursidction of a government created and dominated by an alien people? Have you been returned or repatriated to your ancestral homeland? Were you ever given a choice? Under international law, you still have the status of a prisoner of war until these things happen or you waive your right to claim the prisoner of war status.

Now, if you ask most black people in America if the are citizens of the United States (and hence NOT prisoners of war), they well say, often proudly, yes, I am a citizen of the United States. If you ask them why, they will say “because I have the right to vote”. A few may also mention the 14th Amendment and state that they have a US passport! Some will even boast that they served in the military!

However, even the United States government admits that they can’t positively answer the question regarding the citizenship of black Americans!!!

The US Government has stated in the Brief in Support of Motion to Quash Indictment for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Article III, U.S. Constitution Brought by the Defendant (Imari Obadele and Gaidi Obadele) that

"the issue of whether black folks now within the United States have ever been converted, in accordance with settled principles of universally established law, into United States citizens, and divested altogether of their original foreign African nationality". . . . "is a matter of law."

Recently, a reparations activist in Guyana made the following statement in a WhatsApp forum: "you have voted and hence have voluntarily accepted [that] you are a citizen....prisoners of war don't vote....." In response, I quoted the author of the New Afrikan Military Sciene Institute MSI 2-2 Report (2010): who recently discussed this issue with me:

"To more particularly articulate the point regarding consent, consider:

I did not give my consent to be part of the the polity, US or USA, therefore, imposed exercise of power against my choice or will constitutes force/duress. To employ force to control someone is compelled performance, by definition of US law. Compelled performance is defined as involuntary servitude, which is defined as slavery, which is a violation of the laws of the United States and most State republics. Now, the law , which protects rights of the individual, restrains the imposition of force except in "due process" of law (and a process was established). However, this applies because the people of the polity have all agreed, i.e. given their consent that this is the system and that they are all compliant with it. Now, when people immigrate to this country with minor children, they may get Green Card and then citizenship, and all is well. But, when the child is no longer minor but attains the age 21, he or she must obtain a Green Card and go through the process, or be deported (here unlawfully). I have actually seen this done. It is interesting because, when slaves were purportedly freed, they were never asked (except by Sherman) if they wanted to participate. Matters not how many times your father and mother voted, the logic of the polity's system suggests that upon reaching 21 years of age, you should have been put to question regarding your choice. Why??? "Scott vs Sanford!" At the founding of this polity African descendants, whether free or enslaved, were not considered a part of the polity. At no point have Blacks ever been considered as part of the Founding polity. You are included under the operation of law, 'failure to rebut'. Of course without your full knowledge of the terms such a contract is voidable. Because of Chief Justice Taney's very articulate dissertation in Scott, the 14th Amendment was deemed necessary to create a legal status for Blacks. This is not my opinion, its history. Our history, which the Creed reminds Us of, holds all of the legal points when We recognize contract law and its operation on or condition.”

That said, please read:

WHAT EVERY AFRICAN AMERICAN MUST CONSIDER BEFORE VOTING IN PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

and

The African American Case for Independence at the International Court of Justice

and

NEW AFRIKAN INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENT AND HUMAN RIGHTS: Statement to the 20th session of the UN Intergovernmental Working Group on the Effective Implementation of the Durban Declaration

Share

WORLD AQUATICS AND THE GUINEA BISSAU NATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE: FRAUD, THEFT, DISCRIMINATION & CORRUPTION - ILLEGAL PAYMENTS!!!!

May 27, Bissau - President of the Guinea Bissau Swimming Federation (FNGB), Siphiwe Baleka, received evidence today that Sergio Mane, President of the Guinea Bissau National Olympic Committee and Mr. Duarte Ioia, received an illegal payment from World Aquatics in the amount of $17,500. This despite the fact that it is almost exactly two years since World Aquatics (previously known as FINA) opened an investigation “to clarify key issues related to the Guinea Bissau Swimming Federation, such as the legitimacy and current composition of its governing body” and was later informed that on November 6, 2023, FNGB Secretary General Daiana Taborda Gomes filed criminal complaint at the the Public Ministry of Bissau Regional Court, Crime Branch alleging that someone used the name of the FNGB to open account at the Bank Atlantique Guine Bissau and began to benefit from some transfers from World Aquatics (International Swimming Federation) which amounts to theft from the FNGB.

“World Aquatics has all the documentation showing both the legality of the swimming federation of which I am President and the criminal actions of Mr. Sergio Mane, President of the Guinea Bissau National Olympic Committee and his accomplice, Mr. Duarte Ioia, who are committing fraud and theft pretending to be the legally-registered swimming federation,” said FNGB President Baleka. “World Aquatics is now complicit in this crime since it refuses to stop payment or send a stabilization team to Guinea Bissau like it did for Kenya.”

In an email to World Aquatics on April 2, President Baleka pointed out:

‘1. It has been 674 days since your letter of May 29, 2022 informing us of FINA, now World Aquatics' investigation "to clarify key issues related to the Guinea Bissau Swimming Federation, such as the legitimacy and current composition of its governing body." On August 16, 2022, you emailed, “FINA has reviewed all the documents and other information you have sent us and will include this information in its overall assessment of the [FNGB] situation. Currently, the whole matter is awaiting the FINA Bureau's consideration and decision. Once a decision has been made, FINA will inform you immediately.” Finally, you responded on April 21, 2023 “we will contact you if ever we require further information and/or if a decision is rendered.” No results of any investigation or final determination has been communicated to the FNGB.

2. It has been 634 days since a judicial process was initiated at the Regional Court of Bissau (Distribution No. 633/2022) to determine who is legally-authorized to govern aquatic sports in the Republic of Guinea Bissau and there has been no action in the case due to the broken and dysfunctional judicial system in the country.  Judge Infanta was suspended on suspicion of corruption, and left the country for a long time.

3. It has been 238 days since a letter was delivered to Domingos Monteiro Correia, National Director of the Judiciary Police at Marien Ngouaby Street in Guinea Bissau starting a criminal investigation involving Sergio Mane, President of the National Olympic Committee (COGB) and Mr. Duarte Ioia (whom FINA was investigating), both of whom committed the crimes of fraud, discrimination, theft and perjury.

4. It has been 148 days since FNGB Secretary General Daiana Taborda Gomes filed criminal complaint at the the Public Ministry of Bissau Regional Court, Crime Branch alleging that someone used the name of the legally-registered FNGB to open account at the Bank Atlantique Guine Bissau - a process that can only be done by providing the registration documents of the FNGB which are in possession of FNGB Secretary General Daiana Taborda Gomes - and began to benefit from some transfers from World Aquatics which amounts to theft from the FNGB.  

5. Meanwhile, World Aquatics has allowed the participation of a 28-year old swimmer from Guinea Bissau with 287 World Aquatics Points entered by Mr. Duarte Ioia (under criminal investigation) at the World Championships in both Doha and Fukuoka. In Fukuoka, the swimmer was disqualified in the 100 M Freestyle and finished 115th out of 116 athletes in the 50 M Freestyle with a time of 30.63. There was no national selection process to determine who would represent the country at the World Championships. There was only a private arrangement whereby the nephew of a friend of the President of the COGB was entered to compete. As a result, every swimmer in Guinea Bissau was discriminated against, including the country's best swimmer with a time of 25.37 and 559 World Aquatics Points.

6. Section 8.3 of the World Aquatics Constitution states:  "The Bureau shall have the power to suspend or expel a Member if  

a) the Member does not comply with its obligations towards World Aquatics; 

b) the Member significantly violates this Constitution or the World Aquatics Rules; 

c) according to the respective general assembly of a Member, the Member has lost its status as a National Body representing Aquatics in its country;

d) the Member is unable to preserve its independence for reasons beyond its control (e.g. in case of undue governmental interference); 

e) the Member acts in a manner contrary to any of World Aquatics' objectives; 

f) or in the view of the Bureau, other important reasons justify a suspension or an expulsion. 

For the reasons above, as the legally-registered swimming federation recognized by the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Sport in the Republic of Guinea Bissau (see attached documents), we hereby request, as there has been "no final determination" in your investigation of the situation in Guinea Bissau, and now that it has become a criminal matter within the country and national team selection is now a discriminatory private arrangement, that World Aquatics issue a sanction against Mr. Duarte Ioia and his group with a complete ban from all of World Aquatics competitions and events, including the upcoming Olympic Games in Paris, for all of the reasons listed in section 8.3 of the World Aquatics Constitution. This would be consistent with World Aquatics' action last year in the case of the Kenyan Swimming Federation. We would welcome a Stabilization Committee to come to Guinea Bissau.  Finally, we request that Guinea Bissau athletes be permitted to compete at World Aquatics events under a neutral flag until there is a just final determination.”

The following week, President Baleka was interviewed by the media in Guinea Bissau:

April 10, 2024 Interview with O Democrata newspaper

[INTERVIEW- article translation from the original Portuguese] Siphiweka Baleka, a North-American-Guinean athlete, who represents the national colors in swimming, denounced the existence of a “spider web” of corruption, discrimination and fraud in the swimming federation and at the level of the Guinea Olympic Committee -Bissau, stating that he was the target of betrayal and discrimination in the swimming federation.

“Despite the discrimination and betrayal I was subjected to and the leaders of the federation and the Olympic Committee committed a crime of perjury in international justice to penalize me, I have never regretted choosing Guinea-Bissau, because I am here to fulfill a mission of my ancestors. No matter how complicated this mission is, has risks and all the constraints of this world, I will continue to fight for the swimming federation”, said the athlete, revealing that he was the victim of crimes of fraud, betrayal, discrimination, incompetence and impunity that currently register with the swimming federation in Guinea-Bissau. 

Swimmer Siphiweka Baleka is an American athlete who decided to look for his roots in Guinea-Bissau, which through DNA analysis was discovered to belong to the Balanta ethnic group.

The athlete was seen for the first time on the podium at the Men's International Swimming Championship, held in Egypt in October 2019, with the flag of Guinea-Bissau, which read BALANTA and painted his body with paintings from the Balanta ethnic group, that is, from 'Nghayé'. Baleka dominated that championship and won three gold medals in three events.

ATHLETE ACCUSES SÉRGIO MANÉ AS A GREATEST STRANGULATION TO THE MODALITY THAT THE OLYMPIC COMMITTEE REPRESENTS

Siphiweka Baleka stated that he is no longer willing to work with Duarte Ioia and Sérgio Mané, not today, not tomorrow, not ever, because they are “persona non grata”, having pointed out Sérgio Mané as a stranglehold on the sport that the Olympic Committee represents, in particular to the swimming federation.

“I have sent letters to Duarte, the minister of sports and Sérgio himself asking for mediation and reconciliation, but the latter never deigned to respond to a single letter from me. After the legalization of the swimming federation, we requested to participate in a tournament in zone II of West Africa, but Sérgio Mané blocked our attempt and called me an American citizen”, he reported.

In the letter dated April 21, 2022, addressed to the Secretary General of the African Swimming Confederation, Mohamed Diop, the Guinea-Bissau Olympic Committee said it was following with concern the attempt to destabilize the Federation by an American citizen , Siphiweka Baleka, who acquired the Bissau-Guinean nationality that he intended to represent at the Tokyo Olympics, because “he did not understand the eligibility criteria that would allow him to participate in the games”.

In the same letter, the Committee stated that it did not recognize “an entity other than the one headed by Duarte Ioia, whose composition of bodies was with the International Swimming Federation”.

On this subject, Siphiweka Baleka said that Sérgio Mané's attitude reveals how serious the discrimination he suffered from him is and the losses he had to accept because of a person who does not see him progressing in the swimming federation, remembering that he does not committed no fraud or crime to obtain Guinean nationality, but said he assumed that this struggle was not only due to the fact that he was an American citizen, but rather that he identified with the Balanta ethnic group in Guinea-Bissau.

“Sérgio Mané and Mohamed Diop know each other very well and it must have been easy to manipulate him with false information about me and when we traveled to Senegal he simply blocked our participation. If I had participated in Senegal's event with the same time as Ghana's, I would have gotten a medal. It was in the Dakar competition that Pedro Rogeri, 25 years old, was called for the first time to compete for Guinea-Bissau”, he indicated.

Siphiweka Baleka revealed that in the first event in which Pedro Rogeri participated, he was in the last three positions on the list of competitors, did not bring any medal and swam seven seconds later than him, an eternity, which reveals that he has no future.

He said he was stopped, because if he had had the opportunity to represent the country at the Olympic Games, he would have been in the eyes of the international media and would have revealed the strangulations, erotic behavior of managers and the difficulties that athletes in this sport face and this would expose Sérgio Mané.

“But that wasn’t what was at stake. My participation at my age would draw the world's attention and attract investors, but the lack of vision of some managers put me on the inside,” she lamented.

He stated that if he were recognized and if he were entrusted with the leadership of the federation, he would first work to get FINA to recognize him, because with this recognition the federation would benefit from a support program of 30 thousand dollars to scout for new talents throughout the territory. national, organize the first internal competition, mobilize funds from its contacts to finance the sport and support the complete training of 20 athletes, 10 boys and 10 girls who would compete in the next world tournament and the next Olympic games, as well as building a swimming pool quality for internal competitions.

He revealed that he had drawn up a five-year plan that was submitted to the general director of sport and accused Sérgio Mané of hijacking his vision and plans for the swimming sector, because “where do funds come from to take Pedro two more people to compete in a single event, stay in a renowned hotel for six days, including full meals, without results?”

“If it were me, it would have been different. At 50 years of age, I could enter six races and win at least two important medals. Since 1996, Sérgio Mané has always been secretary or president of the Committee. Almost thirty years later, he has had or brought tangible results to the country,” he criticized and said that statistically, the country's participation in world championships and Olympic games is critical.

“In 1996, Guinea-Bissau took three athletes to the Olympic Games, in 2000 three, 2004 three, 2008 three, 2012 four, 2016 five and in 2021 four”, he indicated, highlighting that statistics reveal that there has been no improvement in this sector and that Sérgio Mané put the country in a bad light, because “it is not fair that a person who has not had any performance for almost 30 years remains at the head of the Committee”.

“In Tokyo, the country was represented by 4 athletes plus 12 people. Where did the money come from to support these people’s expenses and vacations? Every four years for almost 30 years, Sérgio just went on vacation, for a walk. He is a member of the federation of Olympic committees that hold their general assemblies each year, which are also holidays. I doubt that the Olympic Committee does not receive money from the International Olympic Committee on behalf of each Federation created. Money that should have been channeled to each federation to execute its program. He never carried out a single activity in Guinea-Bissau. If it's a lie, submit reports. Who received the thirty thousand dollars from the swimming federation, a new federation within the committee? It’s a question that remains for whoever wants to answer them, but I’m sure that Sérgio is capable of anything, of taking the money for his personal interest,” he said.

“IN ADDITION TO BEING OF GUINEASE DESCENDANT, THE GOVERNMENT WANTED HIM TO COMPETE FOR GUINEA-BISSAU”

He revealed that the letter from the Ministry of Justice that approved the naturalization contained two reasons, firstly because he is a Guinean descendant of the Balanta ethnic group, secondly because it was in the national interest for him to represent Guinea-Bissau and he challenged the national authorities to clarify who has the legitimacy to lead the federation.

 “We have a certificate from the Ministry of Justice that recognizes us as representatives of the federation, also from the Ministry of Youth, Culture and Sports, only the Olympic Committee has been outside of all guidelines, due to signs of corruption. The Committee filed a complaint against me, but so far there has been no decision, because the judge handling the case was being accused of corruption in another case and left the country. There is impunity and lack of justice,” he said.  

Siphiweka Baleka said that she filed a criminal complaint with the International Sports Court based in Switzerland, against the president of the Guinea-Bissau Olympic Committee and that of the Swimming Federation, Sérgio Mané and Duarte Ioia respectively, for being complicit in the registration of the Guinean athlete, Pedro Rogeri, who participated, on behalf of Guinea-Bissau, in the last swimming world championship in Doha, Qatar.

He said that he has been a victim, for two years, of discrimination and attempted exclusion by the directors of the Swimming Federation and the Olympic Committee, remembering that, as a national athlete, his rights were violated and prevented from competing for Guinea-Bissau.

Siphiweka Baleka  said he was surprised why, as interim president of the federation, he was not informed of Pedro Rogeri's call to represent the country in an international event without his knowledge and accused Duarte Ioia and Sérgio Mané of complicity in the appointment of this 25-year-old athlete. age.

“In a country where rules and institutions work, before nominating an athlete to represent their country, there must first be a national championship to choose the best and fastest athletes in this sport. If there was an intention to nominate him, why wasn't I contacted? What criteria were used that led to the choice of Pedro Rogeri? All of this leads me to conclude that I am being discriminated against, which is why I filed a complaint against these gentlemen”, he clarified.

In the interview, he displayed several documents, including one where the invitation to come and represent Guinea-Bissau was formulated and that he would have all the necessary support to do so and the letter from the Olympic Committee which was addressed on the same day and signed by Sérgio Mané, president of the organization.

The naturalized Guinean athlete, who represented Guinea-Bissau twice, in Egypt in a qualifying tournament for the Tokyo Olympics and in the 14th edition of the African competition tournament in Ghana, revealed that the two entities had made a commitment to help him. you to achieve your goals, Tokyo Olympics.

“It was at that time that the former Secretary of State for Sports, Dionísio do Reino Pereira, sent me a letter informing me that my naturalization process had been started so that I could compete in the Tokyo Olympic Games”, he clarified.

He informed that after all the promises he received from the national authorities and from Duarte Ioia and Sérgio Mané, he publicly expressed, in the United States of America, his intention to take up residence in Guinea-Bissau and, in two weeks, after the announcement, practically dominated the covers of the American sports press and The dropped the Sport to Drive Semis, which led a group of people and the Association of North American Retirees to announce support for his decision.

“After this announcement, I went on television in a national program seen by many people. It was then that I received several sponsorship proposals, including a ten thousand dollar contract signed with a group of American retirees”, he said, clarifying that they knew it would not be easy to get a gold medal in this competition, but they still bet on me. person and I was the subject of news in the local media, because I would be the oldest swimmer in Olympic history at fifty years of age, the first African American to represent his country of origin in the Olympic Games and above all, the first Guinean athlete to represent the country at the Olympic Games.

“There would be three of my legacies that would attract funds to Guinea-Bissau. It was precisely this that motivated many people to announce support and investments and I decided to leave my family, a wife and my two children, and my company to take up residence here in Bissau. The contract with the retiree would be to prepare a documentary of my entire preparation, from the United States of America, Guinea-Bissau and up to the Olympic Games. After the Olympic Games, the documentary would be released followed by a series of interviews and speeches around the world, to show my performance that despite being fifty years old I still have the physical conditions to compete at a high level. The documentary had been paid for and each interview would also be paid for by the retirees”, he clarified and said that he had received, under this contract, an estimated amount of six thousand dollars, which he invested in his trip and in the first weeks of his stay in Guinea-Bissau. .

According to Siphiweka Baleka, the remaining amount was blocked because he had not participated in the Tokyo Olympics, not because of incapacity and because he also concluded that at the organizational level, the country had not done anything for an athlete of his level, there are no swimming pools for his preparation, remembering that in order to participate it was necessary for the country to submit a request for Universality and it did so, for the first time, on June 17, 2021 with the signatures of Duarte Ioia and Sérgio Mané and it was submitted on June 27, 2021. same year, it was submitted before the deadline.

He said he was surprised by the decision of the International Swimming Federation (FINA), because the event in which he would participate was not a competition that gave access to qualification for the Olympic Games, which is why the document was rejected and rejected.

He maintained that in order not to miss this opportunity he had to respond in a hurry before the 27th of June, the deadline, so that he could participate on the 26th of the same month in Ghana in one of the events that would give the country a passport to the Olympic Games, because he wants Neither Duarte Ioia nor Aniceto Bernardo speak French or English.

For Siphiweka Baleka, these constraints reveal that the two have no experience in swimming nor contacts in regional, continental and international organizations, remembering that the contacts and their own intention for Guinea-Bissau began when in 2019 they won, in a personal capacity, at an event held in Egypt, he received six gold medals, displaying the flag of Guinea-Bissau, which led the newspaper O Democrat to choose him as Figure of the Week in one of its editions.

“After my participation in this event, I met people, made contacts and at the next event, a national competition, I asked to be allowed to represent Guinea-Bissau. My 2019 performance influenced the organizers. The Egyptian federation asked the Guinea-Bissau federation to send my registration form that I could participate in Egypt and that's where I met Duarte Ioia and Sérgio Mané. They gave me the email and pass to fill out the document that accredited me as a Guinean athlete. I went and competed”, he stated and stressed that after the country submitted the second registration, FINA rejected it with the argument that the deadline for depositing the Universality registration was the 20th, not the 27th of June 2021.

“On all FINA platforms there was no deadline of June 20th, only the 27th. I asked Sérgio Mané that we appeal to a court against FINA's behavior because the deadline of the 20th was not on any of that organization's platforms, but it didn't help. My whole life, family, business depended on my participation in the Tokyo Olympics and because it was also our right to complain about what FINA was doing to penalize Guinea-Bissau and me”, he revealed.

The athlete informed that after all this story, he consulted the FINA documents and discovered that he alone, without the Swimming Federation, could file a lawsuit and he did so with the help of some of his fans, because he needed a thousand dollars and in The next phase of the process would have to pay 20 thousand dollars, which were assumed by a production company that would have the right to make a documentary about the athlete about his life and his participation in Tokyo and part of this documentary would be from Guinea-Bissau, including all necessary details.

“It was a case against FINA, not the Guinea-Bissau Olympic Committee. All parties had to present evidence and at the evidence discovery session, a letter appeared from the Swimming Federation of Guinea-Bissau written in French saying that, from June 21st to July 8th, the federation's email had been violated and that it was not the federation that had control of the mail. FINA asked for information about the email violation, so far it has not received anything from Duarte or Sérgio,” he said.

According to the athlete, it was at that time that the Court announced that it would publish its decision on July 28, two days before his first competition in Tokyo, so he had to be in Japan beforehand and if the decision was favorable he could compete, but given the situation of the Covid-19 pandemic he had difficulties, but thanks to his supporters he managed to pay for his trip.

“I was accredited as a Guinean athlete, because the Guinea-Bissau Olympic Committee had included my name on the national caravan list. In Tokyo, I was not allowed to travel because my badge had been cancelled. I remained there for six days at the airport on my own, waiting for the day of judgment, which unfortunately was not in my favor. No one from Guinea-Bissau intervened to resolve my situation”, he reported.

He admitted that one of the reasons that led him to lose justice are two letters, one of nullity of all documents and another of violation of the e-mail, sent by the Committee to FINA, but he seems reticent about the legality of the decision and the clarity of the process, because “how do Sérgio Mané and Duarte Ioia explain their signatures on one of the documents that call my evidence into question, above all original signatures with stamps in use at that institution, they only know about the email violation?” .

He said he did not doubt that the fraud started in Guinea-Bissau with the complicity of the three elements, namely Duarte Ioia, Sérgio Mané and Aniceto José Bernardo, however he cleared Duarte Ioia of this matter because he did not have knowledge of technology.

He accused Sérgio Mané of having instructed Duarte to act in this way against himself and commit perjury before the courts, stating that despite his complicity in the case, Duarte Ioia humbly decided to apologize to him, because “he was embarrassed by everything that happened around me, he took responsibility for the history of Japan and helped me compete at a continental level so that I could have access to the world swimming tournament that would be in October 2021.”

“After my participation in the tournament in Ghana, Duarte Ioia made his position available on October 25, 2021 and appointed me as the interim president of the Swimming Federation until the organization's General Assembly takes place. The federation didn't even have a legal personality, it was just on paper and it seemed that the support Duarte received from the Olympic Committee was legitimate. When I took on the role on an interim basis, I informed the minister of sports and FINA that we were in a process of revitalizing the organization and renewing the social bodies”, he indicated.

He said that it was from that moment that he knew that nothing had been done internally about swimming and he committed himself to legalizing the federation in Guinea-Bissau and, consequently, FINA, but surprisingly he received a letter from Duarte Ioia saying that he had resumed the its functions, because “I was unable to fulfill my promise to organize the organization’s statutes and hold the General Assembly”.

One of the arguments presented by Duarte Ioia to make his position available to which O Democrat had access in one of the documents he consulted is that he would appoint Siphiweka Baleka as interim president, submitting his figure for approval by the competent bodies.

In reaction, the athlete revealed that he managed to draw up the statutes that were entered on January 29, 2022, as well as holding the General Assembly in March of the same year, one of his missions.

It should be noted that the sports section and the editorial team of O Democrat contacted the general secretary of the Guinea-Bissau Olympic Committee, Eugénio de Oliveira Lopes, to react to the allegations that were made, but he told us that he would need to contact the president first of the body, Sérgio Mané, before reacting.   

By: Filomeno Sambú

Photo: Aguinaldo Ampa

Having received no justice from either the Republic of Guinea Bissau or World Aquatics, President Baleka filed a case at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (see below).

For an exhaustive documentation of the conflict, fraud, theft, discrimination and perjury committed by Mr. Sergio Mane and Mr. Duarte Ioia, see:

Will Siphiwe Baleka and the Guinea Bissau Swimming Federation be Blocked from the Olympics Again?

Update: While writing this post, World Aquatics sent the following message:

Share

PGRNA Minister of Foreign Affairs Siphiwe Baleka discussed the UN Permanent Forum and the Request for an Advisory Opinion from the ICJ on the 𝑹𝒆𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝑵𝒐𝒘 podcast

May 26 - PGRNA Minister of Foreign Affairs Siphiwe Baleka discussed the UN Permanent Forum and the Request for an Advisory Opinion from the ICJ.on the 𝑹𝒆𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒔 𝑵𝒐𝒘 podcast sponsored by Reparations United.

Share

The Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Provisional Government of the Republic of New Afrika addressed the Afrodescendant Nation National Reparations Convention in Washington, D.C.

May 18 , Washington D.C. - Siphiwe Baleka, Minister of Foreign Affairs for the Provisional Government of the Republic of New Afrika, addressed the National Reparations Convention held at the Lincoln Temple United Church , 1701 11th Street, NW Washington D.C. Esteemed leaders, scholars, and diplomats from Reparations Organizations joined in solidarity, unity, and dedication to the pursuit of Self Determination.

Minister Baleka’s presentation during the convention was five minutes and can be viewed at the 1:33.00 mark.. Below is the complete, unedited thirteen minute presentation by Minister of Foreign Affairs SIphiwe Baleka.

ADDRESS TO THE

ADN NATIONAL REPARATIONS CONVENTION

It is an honor and privilege to join you all at this historic reparations convention. I am Siphiwe Baleka, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Provisional Government of the Republic of New Afrika which was founded when over 500 delegates attended the National Black Government Conference sponsored by the Malcolm X Society and declared Independence for the black New Afrikan nation on March 31, 1968. 

The founding fathers have always emphasized that we are seeking reparations for War damages. The war against our ancestors was initiated by a declaration of war issued by Pope Nicholas the V on June 18, 1452 which authorized the invasion of our homelands on the African continent. Our ancestors were captured, trafficked as prisoners of war, and subjected to chattel enslavement that resulted in ethnocide - the destruction of our ancestral identities - and the loss of our sovereignty. These are the first two damages of war that must be repaired. The war was then continued by legislation introduced into the British colonies in the Americas, and then continued by the Constitution of the United States of America. By the time of the Civil War the enslaved Africans had simultaneously suffered ethnocide while at the same time experienced ethnogenesis - the mixing of various African genetic material into new combinations along with a unique shared heritage born from their brutal chattel enslavement - hence the birth of a New Afrikan nation. After Emancipation, the war was continued against the New Afrikan nation when a coup assassinated President Lincoln and took over the government and the new President rescinded legislation that provided for our return to Africa as well as provided land in the Carolinas and Davis Bend, Mississippi, where we established New Afrikan self governing colonies pursuing Independence. Any attempt at establishing independence for our subjugated black New Afrikan nation within the United States was criminalized. In 1919, both Marcus Garvey and W.E.B. DuBois separately petitioned for the former German colonies in Africa to be given as an independent homeland to build our mighty New Afrikan nation. The League of Nations replied that a procedure required the United States to sign a special treaty agreeing to the international protection of its internal minorities. The question of the New Afrikan non-self governing territories and status as an internal colony of the United States was ignored. When the League of Nations was replaced by the United Nations, the United States government failed to list its internal domestic black colony as a non-self governing territory under the UN mandate system like it did for Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico. This is the reason why the era of decolonization on the African continent which led to the recognition of independence for 55 states did not apply to the Republic of New Afrika at its founding. The international community simply ignored our struggle because the United States committed an international fraud by convincing the world that we were citizens of the United States and not an internal domestic colony with the right of self determination. In 1973 Republic of New Afrika President Imari Abubakari Obadele and Attorney Gaidi Obadele exposed this fraud in the Article Three Briefs Establishing the Legal Case for the Existence of the Black Nation The Republic of New Afrika in North America that was filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. The government’s response, the Brief in Support of Motion to Quash Indictment for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Article III, U.S. Constitution Brought by the Defendant states, “Every element of the limits of Sec. (b)(2) clearly exist, with the exception of Obadele showing that he is a person of foreign nationality. That question, however, is a matter of law and requires a decision upon the issue of whether black folks now within the United States have ever been converted, in accordance with settled principles of universally established law, into United States citizens, and divested altogether of their original foreign African nationality”;

Following a workshop of the National Conference of Black Lawyers on September 11, 1987 the PG-RNA submitted to the United States Congress Reparations: A Proposed Act To Stimulate Economic Growth in the United States And Compensate, In Part For the Grievous Wrongs of Slavery And The Unjust Enrichment Which Accrued To The United States Therefrom. The act laid out a simple formula for the payment of reparations: One-third of the annual sum to shall be paid directly to each individual; one third to be paid to the duly elected Government of the Republic of New Afrika, and one-third to be paid directly to a National Congress of Organizations consisting of all the churches and organizations which for a period of two years prior had been engaged in community programs. On September 26, 1987 the National Coalition of Blacks for Reparations in America (NCOBRA) was founded.

It is extremely important to understand that the modern reparations movement in the United States was originally conceived by the nationalist element as payment to a nation for war damages suffered by that nation from war conducted against it by colonial governments and their successor state government, the federal government of the United States, and private entities enlisted to prosecute the war, including banks, insurance companies, and many others.

It is also important to understand that a Newsweek poll in 1969 showed that 27% of black people under the age of 30 wanted independence and a separate government of its own and were willing, like the Africans on the continent, to engage in armed struggle to get it. In response to this growing New Afrikan national consciousness, the United States Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) intensified the war against the New Afrikan Independence Movement and  created its Counterintelligence Program (COINTELPRO) with the following objectives: 

  • Prevent unity

  • Prevent rise of a leader

  • Identify and neutralize [warriors]

  • Alienate the concept of nationalism from the people

  • Prevent nationalism from embedding in youth and future generations

Because of the assassinations of Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr, Fred Hampton, Mark Clark, and others, as well as the imprisonment of the leaders of the New Afrikan Independence Movement,  nationalist consciousness was replaced first with an infusion of drugs creating a drug culture followed by gangsta rap. Meanwhile, in order to mainstream the support for reparations movement, a decision was made to de-emphasize the nationalist element and reduce the amount of overt and covert oppression faced by its proponents. And thus you have the current status today where nationalist consciousness barely exist in black America and is almost completely absent from the Reparations Movement and discussions among the various reparations tasks forces and commissions today. The danger is that if the nationalist portion of the reparations demand continues to be neglected, reparations will not lead to New Afrikan sovereignty and since this is the primary harm committed against us, so-called reparations will not repair this most important harm.

Sovereignty can also easily be restored if the international community supports our righteous struggle for land and independence just like it is now supporting the Palestinians who are demanding sovereignty over their land and recognition as a member of the United Nations. The first step is to conduct a plebiscite - a vote of all  people recorded as Black in the 1970 Census and their descendants of voting age - that allows each person to choose one of the following options: (1) return to their ancestral homeland in Africa, (2) the creation of a new African nation on American soil, (3) full US citizenship and (4) emigration to another country. After the vote,  the resources are to be given based on the number in each category. There must be a "self determination" component in which the people choose for themselves what form of reparations they want in order to achieve "satisfaction". 

The plebiscite is something we must do for ourselves. It will require organizing the logistics for approximately 70,000 voting centers in our black churches, so that 29 million of us can exercise self-determination - deciding which of the four options is best for our family. In this way, we can unite all segments of our community under the plebiscite campaign even though we may disagree on the best way forward for our destiny. Those who want to integrate into America need not fight with those who want to repatriate to their homeland in Africa nor with those who want to liberate the national territory of the Republic of New Afrika. Self determination allows all of us to respect each other and unite in order to get the reparations and remedies that we all need.

The New Afrikan Diplomatic Civil Service Corps (NADCSC) has diligently prepared the Plebiscite Campaign that can lead to a successful plebiscite by 2030 or earlier. It is open to all organizations, activists and individuals who wish to take responsibility for organizing the vote of the approximate 29 million eligible voters. It won’t be easy, and as my great Grand Uncle Reverend Eustace Lewis Blake, the 44th Pastor of Richard Allen’s historic Mother Bethel AME Church in Philadelphia, told his 2,000 congregants at his St. James AME Church in Newark, New Jersey, ‘the price of freedom is not cheap’.

Share

Republic of New Afrika Minister of Foreign Affairs Siphiwe Baleka Concludes Successful Diplomacy Tour in Ougadougu, Burkina Faso

H.E. SIPHIWE BALEKA, MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, PROVISIONAL GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF NEW AFRIKA with KARAMOKO JEAN MARIE TRAORE, MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, REGIONAL COOPERATION AND BURKINA FASO CITIZENS ABROAD.

May 9, 59 ADM* (2024) - The Provisional Government of the Republic of New Afrika (PGRNA) has initiated diplomatic relations with the Republic of Burkina Faso during a Diaspora Investment Summit organized by H.E. Ambassador Arikana Chihombori Quao through the African Diaspora Development Institute (ADDI) in partnership with the embassy of Burkina Faso in Washington, D.C.

PGRNA Minister of Foreign Affairs presented his credentials to Mr. Hermann Toé, Special Advisor of the Minister of Foreign Affairs along with a Concept Note for discussion that included positioning Burkina Faso to be champions of the Global Afrikan Reparatory Justice Movement and Pan Afrikan Movement through support of the upcoming Afrodescendant Nation National Reparations Convention, Right to Return citizenship legislation and the request for an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on “The status of Afro Descendant People as prisoners of war under the Geneva Convention and their right to conduct plebiscites for self-determination.”

“By supporting these efforts, Burkina Faso will further deepen the admiration, respect and support of the African Diaspora that the ADDI mission has so successfully launched,” stated Minister Baleka. “Our great leader, Malcolm X told the African Heads of State, including the President of the former Upper Volta (now the Republic of Burkina Faso) that as Afrikan people dispersed throughout the west, ‘our problems are your problems’. Just as the African Diaspora supported the African liberation movements on the continent, the African Diaspora that constitutes the African Union 6th Region, which includes the Republic of New Afrika, needs citizenship on the continent and a sponsor nation to submit our request for an advisory opinion from the ICJ on the fundamental legal issues concerning reparations for the Dum Diversas War and the legal obligations of the detaining powers under the Geneva Convention towards the descendants of the prisoners of that war that were trafficked and enslaved in the Americas..”

Mr. Baleka believes that if the government of Burkina Faso submits the request for the ICJ Advisory opinion and announces a Diaspora citizenship policy, they will catapult themselves into the forefront of the Reparations movement from the side of African states.

“Burkina Faso will attract the same respect and popularity that South Africa did when it went to the ICJ on behalf of the Palestinians. This will garner Burkina Faso even more global African admiration, especially in the Diaspora and will provide them the narrative that anything the west does to them is in retaliation for standing up for justice for African people, solidifying even more Burkina Faso’s Pan African legitimacy. In turn,  the PG-RNA, the Diaspora and Pan Africanists commit to promoting tourism and investment in Burkina Faso as a priority. and make Ougadougu the location of conferences, conventions and Pan African Congresses for the next two Decades. The idea is to make Burkina Faso the Ghana of the 1960’s minus the CIA infiltration,” said Minister Baleka.

It should be recalled that the government of Ghana was heavily criticized for canceling a Pan African Conference that includied H.E. Ambassador Arikana Chihombori Quao, Julius Malema, PLO Lumumba and Peter Obi that was called by Ghana industrialist Nana Kwame Bediako, who made an appearance during the ADDI Youth event in Burkina Faso. Meanwhile, many veteran Pan African activists, leaders and organizations are skeptical of the planning for the 9th Pan African Conference scheduled for Lome, Togo later this year. There is a growing belief that only Burkina Faso can credibly host such an event.

During the visit, Minister Baleka, who also serves as the Head of Research and Strategy for the Pan African Federalist Movement (PAFM) West Africa Region, had the opportunity to visit the Thomas Sankara Center, a community institution in Ougadougu and discuss PAFM objectives of supporting “sectorial federation” leading towards a United African States by 2030. The West African region is considered an integral part of the “Corridor of Victory” and Burkina Faso is emerging as its center piece..

WHAT IS THE PROVISIONAL GOVERNMENT REPUBLIC OF NEW AFRIKA?

  The Provisional Government of the Republic of New Africa (PG-RNA) was founded with a Declaration  of Independence issued by a convention in Detroit on March 31, 1968. It was inspired by the Malcolm X  Society, and the Provisional Government's purpose has been to complete the work of revolutionaries like  Gabriel Prosser, Denmark Vesey, Osborne Perry Anderson, Tunis Campbell, Edwin McCabe, El Hajj El  Malik Shabazz (Malcolm X), and Queen Mother Moore, by establishing a New Afrikan state in North  America.  FREE THE LAND!!! First and foremost, the Basic Policy of the Government has not changed. Our  policy as stated in the platform papers of December 1969 state:  The basic policy of the government is to establish national strength through sovereignty, effective  international relations, and inherent viability. Our position is that all the land where Black people live, in  what has been called "the continental U.S.," is our land, where we have lived on it traditionally, worked  and developed it, and fought for it. This is the subjugated territory of the Republic of New Africa. Our  basic national objective is to free this land from subjugation: to win sovereignty.  The New Africans’ claim, by rights of heritage and reparations, five states of the Deep South:  Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina. In this area in many counties New  Afrikans//Blacks already constitute a numerical majority. One set of these counties lies along the  Mississippi River from Memphis to the Louisiana border and constitutes a contiguous territory  containing more than 15,000 square miles – a territory which We call the Kush District , almost twice as  large as the state of Israel. It is here that the Provisional Government of the Republic of New Africa has  opened its struggle for land and independence .  

NEW AFRIKA'S NATIONAL TERRITORY 

 In accordance with the rights of our people under international law, including  our right to a contiguous and fruitful land mass as a part of the reparations due us  from the United States, and in view of the United States' failure and refusal in years  since the U.S. Civil War to reach a land and reparations settlement with any of the  legitimate representatives of the New Afrikan nation, in 1968 the Provisional  Government of the Republic of New Afrika, acting for our people as a nation,  PROCLAIMED the territory in North America, now known as Louisiana,  Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina as the core of the National  Territory of the Black Nation in North America, the Republic of New Afrika. It is the  primary task of the Provisional Government to organize the people of the nation for  success in their struggle for independence and sovereignty over this land mass 

NEW AFRIKAN CITZENSHIP

  CITIZENSHIP BY BIRTH 

 Each Afrikan person born in America is a citizen of the Republic of New Afrika. 

CITIZENSHIP BY PARENTAGE  

Any child born to a citizen of the Republic of New Afrika is a citizen of the Republic of New  Afrika.  

CITIZENSHIP BY NATURALIZATION  

Any person not otherwise a citizen of the Republic of New Afrika may become a citizen of the  Republic of New Afrika by completing the procedures for naturalization as provided by the People's  Center Council.  Following paragraph was added after third PCC reading and approval on 28 March 1997.  Any person of Afrikan descent is entitled to acquire citizenship in the Republic of New Afrika by a  simple declaration of Republic of New Afrikan citizenship, made before an official of the  Government on a form prescribed by the President and executed, with signature, by the person  declaring Republic of New Afrikan citizenship.  
itizenship, as provided by the People's Center Council.

 CONSCIOUS CITIZENSHIP  

 All citizens of the Republic of New Afrika who are aware of their citizenship are  conscious New Afrikan citizens.  As a result of an over 300 year-old policy of force and fraud used  by the United States government and the governments of various American states against the New  Afrikan nation, many citizens of the Republic of New Afrika are not aware of their human right to  New Afrikan Citizenship and, indeed, are not aware of the existence of the New Afrikan nation in  North America. The growth of the conscious New Afrikan citizenship is related to the success of the  liberation struggle. The objective measurement of that growth shall be considered in the  development and implementation of Provisional Government policy, programs and structure as  determined by the People's Center Council. 

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Immediate Program of Action:

In January, 58 ADM (2024), the People’s Revolutionary Leadership Council approved the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Immediate Program of Action submitted by Interim Minister of Foreign Affairs Siphiwe Baleka, with the following Primary Objectives:

  1. Win support in the African Union and the United Nations for the New Afrikan and Afro Descendant plebiscite for self determination in the United States;

  2. Secure “right to return” citizenship legislation in African Union member states;

  3. Request an Advisory Opinion from the International Court of Justice on our status as prisoners of war under the Geneva Convention and other fundamental questions pertaining to our reparations claims;

  4. Secure diplomatic recognition from AU member states and other liberation movements

The basis of PGRNA foreign policy is the words of Imari Obadele in 1970:

“Indeed, along with the petition drive a specific campaign must be conducted among New York legislators and U.S. Congressmen (particularly black ones) to make them - and, concurrently, the world - see that our cause is just under moral law and correct under international law and that the law of the United States is deficient in failing to provide a peaceful formula for the separation of communities seeking their independence. . . . Let us return a moment to the  first question: how sovereignty is to be achieved in the first place. From what has already been indicated, it is clear that the overall strategy is to present the United States, the United Nations, and the world with an implacable accomplished fact: the free vote of a community for independence. It is, then, to seek a favorable deployment of world-wide diplomatic pressures and internal (U.S.) political pressures. It is, finally, to follow up the independence vote with creation of a local government and a pattern of action by the local government and the Republic that constitutes the exercise of Sovereignty. In other words, the Government, after the vote, must act like a government. . . . Next we shall demonstrate to the world, by means of a plebiscite, a vote, that it is New Afrika, not the United States, which has the consent of the people who dominate those areas 

The words of Imari Obadele in 1972:

“The problem with international law is that there is nobody there to enforce it - except the powerful. Powerful nations enforce international law only when it suits them - or when they are forced to. . . . The development of foreign support, inside and outside the United Nations, is another of the vital supporting strategies. . . ”;

The words of Imari Obadele also in 1972:

The essential strategy of our struggle for land is to array enough power (as in jiu-jitsu, with a concentration of karate strength at key moments) to force the greatest power, the United States, to abide by international law, to recognize and accept our claims to independence and land. The purpose of this strategy can be further simplified: it is to create a situation for the United States where it becomes cheaper to relinquish control of the Five States than to continue a war against us to take back or hold the area”; and 

The 1933 Convention on the Rights and Duties of States as quoted by  Imari Obadele in 1987:

“Article one of the convention states: ‘The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) a defined territory; (c) government; and (d) the capacity to enter into relations with the other states.’”

H.E. Siphiwe Baleka, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the PGRNA in front of the Burkina Faso President Thomas Sankara Memorial

Share