0
items
$0
Balanta and the Banking System: A Case Study of the Criminal Application of Fictitious Corporate Statutory Law
Our study of the legal issues concerning the Balanta people has revealed that The English, Portuguese and Spanish Christian rulers, from the 13th century up to the present, violated natural law by contriving new forms of personhood called “corporations” subject to fictitious corporate or statutory laws while at the same time designating some groups, including the Balanta and other people taken from their homelands in Africa, as corporate-less beings with no protective shield of a culturally sanctioned corporate status. The objective of these “corporations” is to make profits from the labor of the Balanta and these other peoples. The following articles detail this development:
ON QUESTIONS OF RACE, ETHNICITY AND NATIONALITY
SUMMARY OF LEGAL ISSUES CONCERNING BALANTA PEOPLE
ORIGIN OF LEGAL ISSUES CONCERNING BALANTA PEOPLE IN THE UNITED STATES
DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL ISSUES DURING THE BALANTA MIGRATION PERIOD
LEGAL ISSUES EFFECTING BALANTA AS A RESULT OF CONTACT WITH EUROPEAN CHRISTIANS
LEGAL ISSUES EFFECTING BALANTA AS A RESULT OF CONTACT WITH THE ENGLISH
Timeline of American History And The Birth of White Supremacy and White Privilege in America
DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL ISSUES CONCERNING BALANTA PEOPLE
We are now going to see how these fictitious corporate or statutory laws are used to oppress and steal from the Balanta people in the United States through the corporate banking system. The following is an excerpt from the book, Meet Your Strawman: And Whatever You Want to Know:
WHAT IS MONEY?
Originally, in England, the unit of money was called “one pound sterling”. That was because it was literally, sterling silver weighing one pound. As it was quite difficult to carry several pounds weight of currency around with you, it was arranged that the actual silver could be held in a bank and a promissory note which was essentially, a receipt for the deposit of each pound of silver on deposit, was issued. It was much easier to carry these “bank notes” around and to do business with them. If you wanted to, you could always take these notes to a bank and ask for them to be cashed, and the bank would hand you the equivalent weight of sterling in exchange for the notes.
Today, the currency in America is “bank notes” which are certainly easier to carry around than metal coins, bu there is one very important difference. These notes are issued by the private company called “The Federal Reserve Bank” (which is a s good a name for a company as any other name). However, if you were to take one of their bank notes to a branch of that company and ask for it to be cashed, all that they would do is give you another not with the same numbers of credit printed on it, or alternatively, other notes with smaller numbers printed on them. This is because, unlike the original bank notes, there is nothing of any physical value backing up the bank notes of today - they are only materially worth the physical paper on which they are printed.
It actually gets worse than that. What happens most commonly nowadays is that they do not even bother printing those pieces of paper. Now, they just tap some numbers into a computer record, or if they are old-fashioned enough, they write the numbers into a ledger by hand. What do those numbers represent? Nothing at all - they have no actual value, in other words, just as much value as if you typed them into your own computer - quite meaningless - and yet, a bank or other financial institution will merrily “lend” you those numbers in return for years of your work, plus interest charges - now isn’t that really generous of them?
Actually, this is not at all funny, because if you don’t keep paying them money earned by your very real work, they will attempt to take your house and possessions away from you. This wont happen if you understand that what they lent you was actually valueless. Take the case of Jerome Daly of Minnesota in America. In court, Jerome challenged the right of the bank to foreclose on his home which had been purchased with a loan from the bank. Jerome argued that any mortgage contract required that both parties (that is, himself and the bank) put up a legitimate form of property for the exchange. In legal language, that is called a legitimate “consideration” put forward by both parties to the contract.
Jerome explained that the “money” was in fact not the property of the bank as it had been created out of nothing as soon as the loan agreement was signed. That is, the money does not come out of the bank’s existing assets as the bank is simply inventing it, and in reality the bank is putting up nothing of its own, except for a fictional liability on paper. As the court case progressed, the President of the Bank, Mr. Morgan, took the stand and admitted that the bank, in combination with the (privately owned commercial company called) “The Federal Reserve Bank”, created the entire amount of the loan in “credit” in its own books by means of a bookkeeping entry, the money and credit coming into existence when they created it. Further, Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute exists which gives him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and must be tendered to support the loan agreement. The jury found that there had been no lawful consideration put forward by the bank, so the court rejected the bank’s application for foreclosure and Jerome Daly kept his home debt free.
That is exactly the situation with all American mortgages. When someone makes an application for a mortgage or any other loan, the applicant’s signature is required on the application form before the loan is approved. The “signature” on that signed application makes it a valuable piece of paper which the bank can deposit in its accounts as a credit to the bank for the amount of the loan. The bank could just keep that application form and stay ahead by $100,000 or whatever, but they want more, much more. They want the borrower to pay them that same amount again, funding it by years of labor, and not only the amount of the supposed “loan” but significant extra amount in interest as well. Why do you think that they are so keen to lend you “money” - they are even willing to lend to people with very poor credit, as there is no way that the bank can lose out on the deal, no matter what happens.
This is why, if a company starts demanding payment of large sums of money, you start by asking them to provide the “accounting” for the deal. In other words, you are asking them to show in writing that they provided something of genuine worth as their side of the loan contract. As they invented the money as numbers in their books, with no real worth attached to those numbers, they are in deep trouble as they can’t comply with your demand to see their accounting for the deal. Did you ever wonder how the average bank manages to make hundreds of millions of dollars profit every year?
THE BOOKKEEPING
This next part of the information may be a little difficult to understand. When any business is being run, the accounts are recorded as money “coming in” and money “going out”. For a bank, the money coming in is called a “Credit” and money going out is called a “Debit”. The objective is to have these two amounts always match each other (balance) for any customer. Not everything done in banking is immediately obvious to the average person, so it may be a little difficult to understand how everything works in this area.
If you have an account with a bank and you deposit $200 to open the account, the bank enters that in its books as a Credit. The Credit on your account is $200 and the Debit is $0 so the balance has a positive, or Credit, value of $200.
If you were to withdraw $300, then the bank would record this as a Debit of $300. When the Credit balance on your account is $200, the balance on your account would be $100 in Debit, that is, overdrawn by $100.
If you were to deposit a further $100 and then close your account, the bank would not have any problem, other than the fact that they would like to keep you on as a customer.\
As far as the accounting goes, your account is balanced and the bank is satisfied with the state of affairs, $300 has come in and $300 has gone out, the books balance -case closed.
Now, if you were to apply for a loan (mortgage or otherwise) for $100,000 from the bank, they would give you an application form which is set out in such a way that you have to fill in the Strawman’s name rather than your own - separate boxes with one of them containing “Mr.” and they may even require you to fill the form in using block capital letters.
You may think the capital letters are so that they can read your writing or perhaps, to make it easier for it to be entered into a computer, but the name in those capital letters belongs to the Strawman and not you. You have actually made an application on behalf of the Strawman and not on behalf of yourself!
You might wonder why they would want you to do this. After all, what could they ever get from the Strawman? Well, you might be surprised. When the Strawman was incorporated they assigned a large monetary value to it, possibly $100,000,000 and they have been trading on the stock market on behalf of the Strawman ever since, and you know how many years that has been. So, very surprisingly, in their opinion, the little fellow is really very rich, and you have just authorized them to take the amount of your loan application from the Strawman’s account. So before the bank passes you any money, it has already gotten its money from the Strawman account and entered it in its books as a $100,000 Credit to your loan account. They then place the $100,000 into your loan account as a Debit. Interestingly, that loan account is now balanced and could easily be closed off as a completed deal.
This is where the sneaky part comes in. To get the money out of your account, you have to write and sign a check for $100, 000 on that account. What does the bank do with checks which you sign? It assigns them to the account as an asset of the bank, and suddenly, the bank is ahead by $100,000 because the check is in the name of the Strawman who can supply the bank with almost any amount of money. But it doesn’t end there, as the bank is confident that you know so little about what is going on that you will pay them anything up to $100,000 over the years, against what you believe you owe them! If that happens, then they have made yet another $100,000 for the bank. To make things even better for them, they want you to pay them interest on the money which you (don’t actually) owe them. Overall, they make a great deal of money when you borrow from them, so perhaps you can see now why banks make hundreds of millions in profit each year.
If the loan were used to buy a property, then the bank probably insisted that you assign the title deeds to them as collateral for the loan, as soon as the property deal closed (was completed). If you then fail to keep paying them, they are likely to attempt to foreclose on the “loan” and sell your property quickly for an even greater profit. And to add insult to injury, if the property sale did not exceed the amount of the “loan” plus the charges for selling it, then they are likely to claim that you owe them the difference!
Perhaps you can now see why Jerome Daly told them to go take a running jump at themselves, and why your request for “the accounting” for any loan made to you, puts the bank in an impossible situation. If the bank then just writes and tells you that the “debt” is fully discharged, they still have made a massive profit on the operation, and they also hope that the vast majority of their customers will not catch on to the fact that they are paying far too much for their property, or even that there is a Strawman involved.
https://www.slideshare.net/SurbhiJindal3/federal-reserve-bank
Please don’t feel that you are ripping off the banks if you don’t pay them what they are asking you to pay - they have already recovered everything paid out before you start paying them for the second or third time.
When it is a Mortgage the entire process is very much the same. . . . [Here] is typical property sale and mortgage:
The buyer goes to Magic Bank in response to the bank’s claim that it is in the business of lending money in accordance with its corporate charter. The buyer went to the bank believing that Magic Bank had the asset (money) to lend. Magic Bank never tells its customers the truth that it does not have any money to lend, nor that Magic Bank is not permitted to use their depositors’ money to lend to its borrowers.
Notwithstanding the fact that Magic Bank does not have any money to lend, Magic Bank makes the buyer/borrower sing a mortgage loan application form which is essentially a promissory note saying that the buyer/borrower promises to pay Magic Bank for the money (what money?) which he is supposed to receive from Magic Bank even before any value or consideration is received by the buyer/borrower from Magic Bank. The buyer actually paid for the property using his own promissory note.
At this point, the seller has not received any money or cash so Magic Bank and its magicians must perform more magic in order to satisfy the seller’s requirement that he get paid, or the whole deal is null and void. The seller does not even know that the property has been magically conveyed to the buyer’s name in order for the seller to receive any money.
The ensuing magic trick is accomplished this way. The buyer is made to sign another promissory note. The mortgage contract is attached to the promissory note which makes the buyer liable to pay Magic Bank for the money or the loan which the buyer has not yet or may never receive for up to twenty five years or more depending on the term of the mortgage contract. This note is linked to the collateral thorugh the mortgage contract as such, it is valuable to Magic Bank.
Magic Bank then goes to the Federal Reserve Bank or to another bank to pledge the deal that they have just gotten from the buyer for credit. The Federal Reserve Bank then gives Magic Bank the “credit”. Remember, it is not Magic Bank’s credit, it is the buyer’s credit who promised to pay Magic Bank if and when the money is received by the buyer from Magic Bank payable for up to 25 years or more.
Note: What happened above is basically a “swap” transaction all banks do to “monetize” security. In this case, the second promissory note that is linked to the mortgage contract and signed by the buyer is a mortgage-backed security.
Magic Bank will then agree to pay the Federal Reserve Bank a certain percentage of interest over “prime”. Thus the buyer’s loan package goes to the Federal Reserve Bank which credits Magic Bank with the full amount of credit which is the total amount of the principal plus all the interest payments the buyer has promised to pay to Magic Bank for 25 years or more which is usually three times the amount of the money promised by Magic Bank to the buyer. By magic, Magic Bank just enriched itself and got paid in advance, without using or risking its own money.
Magic Bank’s magician, the lawyer who holds the check that is backed by the buyer’s promissory note, then writes a check to the seller as payment for the property. In effect, the buyer paid the seller with his own money by virtue of the fact that it was the buyer’s own money (the promissory note) that made the purchase of the sale possible. Magic Bank just mad a cool 300% profit without using or risking any capital of its own.
Neither was there any depositor’s money deducted from Magic Bank’s asset account in this transaction.
What really happened was pure deception and if we the people tried to do this, we would end up in prison being found guilty of fraud and criminal conversion not to mention that the property would have been seized by the court.
This is only a crime if we, the people, do it to each other as it would be an indictable crime if we issued a check with no funds. There would not be any deal, no purchase and sale agreement because there is no valuable consideration. In order to de-criminalize the transaction, we need Magic Bank and their cohorts to make the deal happen. It is really a conspiracy of sorts but these “person"s” , the banks, the lawyers, the land title offices or eve the courts do not consider the transaction as fraudulent transactions because these transactions happen all the time.
Such a contract is “void ab initio” or “void from the beginning” which means that the contract never took place in the first place. Moreover, the good faith and fair dealing requirements through full disclosure is non-existent which further voids the contract.
Magic Bank failed to disclose to the buyer that it will not be giving the buyer any valuable consideration and taking interest back as additional benefit to unjustly enrich the corporation. Magic Bank also failed to disclose how much profit they are going to make on the deal.
Magic Bank led the buyer to believe that the money going to the seller would be coming from its own asset account. They lied because they knew, or ought to have known, that their own book or ledger would show that Magic Bank does not have any money to lend and that their records will show that no such loan transaction ever took place. Their own book will show that there would be no debits from Magic Bank’s asset account at all and all that would show up are the two entries made when the buyer gave Magic Bank the first collateral or the promissory note which enabled Magic Bank to cut a check which made it possible to convey the property from seller to the buyer free and clear of all liens or encumbrances as required by the agreement of purchase and sale entered into in writing between the buyer and the seller. What really happened was not magic; in reality, the buyer’s promissory note was used by Magic Bank and its magicians - the lawyers and land title clerks - to convey free title to the buyer from the seller. So why do we need the mortgage contract at all?
The other entry that would show up when we audit Magic Bank’s accounts, is the other pledge of collateral including the buyer’s promissory note which was converted (unlawfully and without disclosure or permission from the buyer) into a mortgage-backed security which was “swapped” or deposited by Magic Bank to the Federal Reserve Bank for which another deposit was entered into Magic Bank’s transaction account. From the above, we can list all the criminal acts perpetrated by Magic Bank:
The mortgage contract was “void ab-initio” because Magic Bank lied and never intended to lend a single cent of their own asset or depositor’s money to the buyer.
A valid contract must have lawful or valuable consideration. the contract failed for anticipated breach. Magic Bank never planned to give the buyer/borrower any valuable consideration.
Magic Bank breached all its fiduciary duties to the buyer and is therefore guilty of criminal breach of trust by failing in its good faith requirement.
Magic Bank concealed the fact from the buyer that it would be using the buyer’s promissory notes; first to clear all the liens and encumbrances in order to convey clear title to the buyer and then use the second promissory note to obtain more money from the Federal Reserve Bank or other institutions that buy and sell mortgage-backed security. Magic Bank received up to three times the amount of money required to purchase the property and kept the proceeds to itself without telling the buyer.
Magic Bank violated its corporate charter by lending “credit” or “nothing at all” to the buyer and then charging interest on this make-believe loan. Banks are only licensed to lend their own money, not other people’s money. Magic Bank used the buyer’s promissory note to clear the title which essentially purchased the property from the seller. The transaction is ‘An ultra vires” transaction because Magic Bank has engaged in a contract “outside of it’s lawful mandate.” An ultra vires contract is void or voidable because it is non-existent in law.
Everyone involved in this undertaking with Magic Bank, starting with the loan or mortgage officer, the lawyers, the land title office and even the central bank are equally guilty by association by aiding and abetting Magic Bank in its commission of its crimes against the buyer and the people who would eventually have to absorb all of the loss through increased taxes, etc.
In the final analysis, Magic Bank and the other who profited from the ultra vires transaction are all guilty of unjust enrichment and fraud for deceiving the buyer and the people, and for acting in concert in this joint endeavor to deceive the buyer.
From Shaun Walker’s petition to the U.S. House of Representatives
“Let's abolish the federal reserve and save Humanity from slavery.
Now that we know the Federal Reserve is a privately owned, for-profit corporation, a natural question would be: who OWNS this company? Peter Kershaw provides the answer in "Economic Solutions" where he lists the ten primary shareholders in the Federal Reserve banking system.
1) The Rothschild Family - London
2) The Rothschild Family - Berlin
3) The Lazard Brothers - Paris
4) Israel Seiff - Italy
5) Kuhn-Loeb Company - Germany
6) The Warburgs - Amsterdam
7) The Warburgs - Hamburg
8) Lehman Brothers - New York
9) Goldman & Sachs - New York
10) The Rockefeller Family - New York
Now I don't know about you, but something is terribly wrong with this situation. Namely, don't we live in AMERICA? If so, why are seven of the top ten stockholders located in FOREIGN countries? That's 70%! To further convey how screwed-up this system is, Jim Marrs provides the following data in his phenomenal book, "Rule By Secrecy." He says that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which undeniably controls the other eleven Federal Reserve branches, is essentially controlled by two financial institutions:
1) Chase-Manhattan (controlled by the Rockefellers) - 6,389,445 shares - 32.3%
2) Citbank - 4,051,851 shares - 20.5%
Thus, these two entities control nearly 53% of the New York Federal Reserve Bank. Doesn't that boggle your mind? Now, considering how many trillions of dollars are involved here, and how the bankers are WAY above our "selected" officials in Washington, D.C., do you think the above-listed banks and families have an inordinate amount of say-so in how our country is being run? The answer is blindingly apparent.
Where does the money come from?
We all know that the Federal Reserve CORPORATION prints money - then loans it, at interest, to our government. But wait until you see what a total scam this process is. But before we get to the meat of this issue, let's remember one thing about the very essence of banking - primarily that money should have some type of standard upon which its value is based. In the case of America, we operate on what is called a "gold standard" (i.e. our money is backed by gold).
So, with that in mind, let's look at how money is actually created, and at what cost. If the Federal Reserve wants to print 1,000 one-hundred ($100) bills, their total cost for ink, paper, plates, labor, etc. would be approximately $23.00 (according to Davy Kidd in "Why A Bankrupt America"). Now, if you do the math, the total cost of 10,000 bills would be $230.00 ($.023 x 10,000). But, and here's the catch - 10,000 $100 bills equals $1,000,000! So, the Federal Reserve can "create" a million dollars, then LEND it to the U.S. Government (with interest) for a total cost of $230.00! That's not a bad deal, huh!
The banking industry calls this process "seignorage." I call it outright THEFT. Why? Well, regardless of the immense profit margin ($1,000,000 for $230), plus the huge interest payments, our government then needs to STEAL the American people's money to payoff their debts via a Mob-like agency called the IRS. So the bankers steal from the government, then the government turns around and steals from the people. I'm no genius, but who do you think is getting screwed in this process? US - the people at the bottom rung of the ladder.
What's worse is that - now catch your breath - there's NO MORE gold left in Fort Knox! It's all gone. In other words, the GOLD STANDARD that our financial system was based upon is now an illusion. We can't convert our money into gold --- only other currency. The entire underlying basis for our money is now a lie - a sham. The Federal Reserve has become so arrogant that they've become a literal MONEY MAKING MACHINE, creating currency out of thin air! So that's where the Fed gets their money - they literally make it, then lend it to us so they can make even MORE money off of it.
Money As A Religion
The above-detailed process has become so ridiculous that William Grieder, former assistant managing editor of the Washington Post, wrote a book in 1987 entitled, "Secrets of the Temple: How the Federal Reserve Runs the Country" that details how the Controllers have conditioned us to accept this absurd situation.
To modern minds," he writes, "it seemed bizarre to think of the Federal Reserve as a religious institution. Yet the conspiracy theorists, in their own demented way, were on to something real and significant. The Fed did also function in the realm of religion. Its mysterious powers of money creation, inherited from priestly forebears, shielded a complex bundle of social and psychological meanings. With its own form of secret incantation, the Federal Reserve presided over awesome social ritual, transactions so powerful and frightening they seemed to lie beyond common understanding."
Mr. Grieder continues, "Above all, money was a function of faith. It required implicit and universal social consent that was indeed mysterious. To create money and use it, each one must believe, and everyone must believe. Only then did worthless pieces of paper take on value."
Do you get it? MONEY is an ILLUSION! Why? Because the gold standard upon which our money is supposed to be based has been eliminated. There's no more gold in Fort Knox. It's all GONE! Now, money really IS only paper!!! In the past, money was supposed to represent something of tangible value.
Now it's simply paper!
Taken one step further, many of us don't even use paper money any more! Why? Well, here's a scenario. Many places of employment directly deposit their employee's paychecks into the bank. Once the money is there, when bill time comes around, the person in question can write out a stack of checks to pay them. Plus, when they need gasoline they use a credit card; and groceries a debit card. If this person goes out for dinner on Friday night, they can charge the tab on their diner's card. But what about the tip? They simply scribble in the amount at the bottom of the check. So far, the person hasn't spent a single dollar bill. Plus, if you bring electronic banking into the picture, we've virtually eliminated the use for money.
And, God forbid, what happens when encoded microchips are implanted into the backs of our hand?
In essence, money has become nothing more than an illusion - an electronic figure or amount on a computer screen. That's it! As time goes on, we have an increasing tendency toward being sucked into this Wizard of Oz vortex of unreality. Think about it. Americans as a whole are carrying more personal debt than in any other time in history. Plus our government keeps going further and further into the hole, with no hope of ever crawling out. But we have less and less actual MONEY! We're being enslaved by the debt of electronic blips on a computer screen! And 70% of the banks that control this debt via the Federal Reserve exist in foreign countries! What in God's name is going on? As author William Bramley says, "The result of this whole system is MASSIVE debt at every level of society."
We're getting screwed in a sickening way, folks, and the people doing it are demented magician-priests that use the ILLUSION of money as their control device. And I hate to say it, but if we allow things to keep going as they are, the situation will only get worse. Our only hope ... ONLY HOPE ... is to immediately take drastic action and remedy this crime.
Do some research, wake up, stand up and do something about it....
IRS FRAUD
THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES PUBLISHED IN THE USA TODAY WILL EXPLAIN ALL OF IT
WHY DO YOU PAY TAXES?
Birth Certificates are Federal Bank Notes
In 1913, Colonel Edward Mandell House helped to pick the charter members of the original Federal Reserve Board.
Edward Mandell House (originally “Huis” which became “House”) was born July 26, 1858 in Houston, Texas. He became active in Texas politics and served as an advisor to President Woodrow Wilson, particularly in the area of foreign affairs. House functioned as Wilson's chief negotiator in Europe during the negotiations for peace (1917-1919), and as chief deputy for Wilson at the Paris Peace Conference. He died on March 28, 1938 in New York City.
Edward and his father had friends in the Ku Klux Klan. The Klan dispensed vigilante justice after the Civil War. In 1880 a new legitimate group was in charge of dispensing justice in Texas -- the Texas Rangers. Many of the Texas Rangers were members of the Klan. Edward was the new master. Edward gained their loyalty by stroking their egos. Edward would use his money and influence to try and make them famous. Edward eventually inherited the Texas Ku Klux Klan.
Edward Mandell House helped to make four men governor of Texas: James S. Hogg (1892), Charles A. Culberson (1894), Joseph D. Sayers (1898), and S. W.T. Lanham (1902). After the election House acted as unofficial advisor to each governor. Hogg gave House the title "Colonel" by promoting House to his staff.
Edward wanted to control more than Texas, Edward wanted to control the country. Edward would do so by becoming a king maker instead of a king. Edward knew that if he could control two or three men in the Senate, two or three men in the House; and the President, he could control the country.
Edward would influence the candidate from behind the scenes. The people would perceive one man was representing them, when in reality; an entirely different man was in control. House didn't need to influence millions of people; he need only influence a handful of men. Edward would help establish a secret society in America that would operate in the same fashion -- the Council on Foreign Relations.
Edward Mandell House was instrumental in getting Woodrow Wilson elected as President. Edward had the support of William Jennings Bryan and the financial backing of the House of Rockefeller's National City Bank. Edward became Wilson's closest unofficial advisor.
Edward Mandell House and some of his schoolmates were also members of Cecil Rhodes Round Table group. The Round Table Group, the back bone of the Secret Society, had four pet projects, a graduated income tax, a central bank, creation of a Central Intelligence Agency, and the League of Nations.
The Confessions of a Reformer by Fredric C. Howe
Between 1901 and 1913 the House of Morgan and the House of Rockefeller formed close alliances with the Dukes and the Mellons. This group consolidated their power and came to dominate other Wall Street powers including: Carnegie, Whitney, Vanderbilt, Brown-Harriman, and Dillon-Reed. The Round Table Group wanted to control the people by having the government tax people and deposit the peoples money in a central bank. The Group would take control of the bank and therefore have control of the money. The Group would take control of the State Department and formulate government policy, which would determine how the money was spent. The Group would control the CIA which would gather information about people, and script and produce psycho-political operations focused at the people to influence them to act in accord with Round Table Group State Department policy decisions. The Group would work to consolidate all the nations of the world into a single nation, with a single central bank under their control, and a single International Security System. Some of the first legislation of the Wilson Administration was the institution of the graduated income tax (1913) and the creation of a central bank called the Federal Reserve. An inheritance tax was also instituted. These tax laws were used to rationalize the need for legislation that allowed the establishment of tax-exempt foundations. The tax-exempt foundations became the link between the Group member's private corporations and the University system. The Group would control the Universities by controlling the sources of their funding. The funding was money sheltered from taxes being channeled in ways which would help achieve Round Table Group aims.
Edward Mandell House had this to say in a private meeting with President Woodrow Wilson:
“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will effect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.
Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”
Watch this video below explaining how Admiralty Law is applied in the case of Birth Certificates
City of London Corporation:
The City of London Corporation, officially and legally the Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of London, is the municipal governing body of the City of London, the historic centre of London and the location of much of the United Kingdom's financial sector.
In 2006 the name was changed from Corporation of London as the corporate body needed to be distinguished from the geographical area thus avoiding confusion with the wider London local government, the Greater London Authority.[3]
Both businesses and residents of the City, or "Square Mile", are entitled to vote in City elections, and in addition to its functions as the local authority—analogous to those undertaken by the 32 boroughs that administer the rest of the Greater London region—it takes responsibility for supporting the financial services industry and representing its interests.[4] The corporation's structure includes the Lord Mayor, the Court of Aldermen, the Court of Common Council, and the Freemen and Livery of the City. The "Liberties and Customs" of the City of London are guaranteed in Magna Carta’s clause 9, which remains in statute.[5]
Two Constitutions in the United States. 1st was suspended in favor of a Vatican Corporation in 1871
“Pope meeting with the board of directors of The Vatican Bank
Since 1871 the United States president and the United States Congress has been playing politics under a different set of rules and policies. The American people do not know that there are two Constitutions in the United States. The first penned by the leaders of the newly independent states of the United States in 1776. On July 4, 1776, the people claimed their independence from Britain and Democracy was born. And for 95 years the United States people were free and independent. That freedom ended in 1871 when the original “Constitution for the united states for America” was changed to the “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”.
The Congress realized that the country was in dire financial straits, so they made a financial deal with the devil – international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London ) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. The conniving international bankers were not about to lend the floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a way of taking back control of the United States and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed. With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia.
With the passage of “the Act of 1871” a city state (a state within a state) called the District of Columbia located on 10 sq miles of land in the heart of Washington was formed with its own flag and its own independent constitution – the United States’ secret second constitution.
The flag of Washington’s District of Columbia has 3 red stars, each symbolizing a city state within the three city empire. The three city empire consists of Washington D.C., London, and Vatican City. London is the corporate center of the three city states and controls the world economically. Washington’s District of Columbia city state is in charge of the military, and the Vatican controls it all under the guise of spiritual guidance. Although geographically separate, the city states of London, the Vatican and the District of Columbia are one interlocking empire called “Empire of the City”
The constitution for the District of Columbia operates under tyrannical Vatican law known as “Lex Fori” (local law). When congress passed the act of 1871 it created a separate corporation known as THE UNITED STATES and corporate government for the District of Columbia. This treasonous act has unlawfully allowed the District of Columbia to operate as a corporation outside the original constitution of the United States and in total disregard of the best interests of the American citizens.
What did the Act of 1871 achieve? The ACT of 1871 put the United States back under British rule (which is under Vatican rule). The United States people lost their independence in 1871.
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic. It does not! Capitalization is NOT insignificant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly “minor” alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans. What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government.
Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the organic Constitution, we the people now have “relative” rights or privileges. One example is the Sovereign’s right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a “privilege” that requires citizens to be licensed – driver’s licenses and Passports. By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. The Act of 1871 became the FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials.
As of 1871 the United States isn’t a Country; It’s a Corporation! In preparation for stealing America, the puppets of Britain’s banking cabal had already created a second government, a Shadow Government designed to manage what “the people” believed was a democracy, but what really was an incorporated UNITED STATES. Together this chimera, this two-headed monster, disallowed “the people” all rights of sui juris. [you, in your sovereignty]
The U.S.A. is a Crown Colony. The U.S. has always been and remains a British Crown colony. King James I, is not just famous for translating the Bible into “The King James Version”, but for signing the “First Charter of Virginia” in 1606 — which granted America’s British forefathers license to settle and colonize America. The charter guaranteed future Kings/Queens of England would have sovereign authority over all citizens and colonized land in America.
After America declared independence from Great Britain, the Treaty of Paris, signed on September 3, 1783 was signed. That treaty identifies the King of England as prince of U.S. “Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch- treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America“– completely contradicting premise that America won The War of Independence.
Article 5 of that treaty gave all British estates, rights and properties back to Britain.
“It is agreed that Congress shall earnestly recommend it to the legislatures of the respective states to provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects; and also of the estates, rights, and properties of persons resident in districts in the possession on his Majesty’s arms and who have not borne arms against the said United States. And that persons of any other decription shall have free liberty to go to any part or parts of any of the thirteen United States and therein to remain twelve months unmolested in their endeavors to obtain the restitution of such of their estates, rights, and properties as may have been confiscated; and that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states a reconsideration and revision of all acts or laws regarding the premises, so as to render the said laws or acts perfectly consistent not only with justice and equity but with that spirit of conciliation which on the return of the blessings of peace should universally prevail. And that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states that the estates, rights, and properties, of such last mentioned persons shall be restored to them, they refunding to any persons who may be now in possession the bona fide price (where any has been given) which such persons may have paid on purchasing any of the said lands, rights, or properties since the confiscation.
And it is agreed that all persons who have any interest in confiscated lands, either by debts, marriage settlements, or otherwise, shall meet with no lawful impediment in the prosecution of their just rights.”
It is becoming increasingly apparent to American citizens that government is no longer being conducted in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, or, within states, according to state constitutions. While people have recognized for more than 150 years that the rich and powerful often corrupt individual officials, or exert undue influence to get legislation passed that favors their interests, most Americans still cling to the naive belief that such corruption is exceptional, and that most of the institutions of society, the courts, the press, and law enforcement agencies, still largely comply with the Constitution and the law in important matters. They expect that these corrupting forces are disunited and in competition with one another, so that they tend to balance one another.
Mounting evidence makes it clear that the situation is far worse than most people think, that during the last several decades the U.S. Constitution has been effectively overthrown, and that it is now observed only as a façade to deceive and placate the masses.”
The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871
“is an Act of Congress that repealed the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and established a new territorial government for the whole District of Columbia. Though Congress repealed the territorial government in 1874, the legislation was the first to create a single municipal government for the federal district.[1].
The outbreak of the American Civil War in 1861 led to notable growth in the capital's population due to the expansion of the federal government and a large influx of emancipated slaves.[2] By 1870, the District's population had grown 75% to nearly 132,000 residents.[3] Growth was even more dramatic within the County of Washington, where the population more than doubled as people escaped the crowded city.[4]
The individual local governments within the District were insufficient to handle the population growth. Living conditions were poor throughout the capital, which still had dirt roads and lacked basic sanitation. The situation was so bad that some lawmakers in Congress even suggested moving the capital out further west, but President Ulysses S. Grant refused to consider the proposals.[5]
Instead, Congress passed the Organic Act of 1871, which revoked the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and combined them with Washington County to create a unified territorial government for the entire District of Columbia.[6]
The Act did not establish a new city or city government within the District. Regarding a city , it stated that "the District of Columbia be, and is hereby, declared to be the successor of said corporations (Washington and Georgetown)". In the present day, the name "Washington" is commonly used to refer to the entire District, but there is no longer an official entity in the District by that name.[9]”
The Papal Bull Dum Diversas issued by Pope Nicholas V, June 18, 1452, states,
“we grant to you full and free power, through the Apostolic authority by this edict, to invade, conquer, fight, subjugate the Saracens and pagans, and other infidels and other enemies of Christ, and wherever established their Kingdoms, Duchies, Royal Palaces, Principalities and other dominions, lands, places, estates, camps and any other possessions, mobile and immobile goods found in all these places and held in whatever name, and held and possessed by the same Saracens, Pagans, infidels, and the enemies of Christ, also realms, duchies, royal palaces, principalities and other dominions, lands, places, estates, camps, possessions of the king or prince or of the kings or princes, and to lead their persons in perpetual servitude, and to apply and appropriate realms, duchies, royal palaces, principalities and other dominions, possessions and goods of this kind to you and your use and your successors the Kings of Portugal.”
The Papal Bull "Inter Caetera," issued by Pope Alexander VI on May 4, 1493 stated that any land not inhabited by Christians was available to be "discovered," claimed, and exploited by Christian rulers and declared that "the Catholic faith and the Christian religion be exalted and be everywhere increased and spread, that the health of souls be cared for and that barbarous nations be overthrown and brought to the faith itself." This "Doctrine of Discovery" became the basis of all European claims in the Americas as well as the foundation for the United States’ western expansion. This ideology supported the dehumanization of those living on the land and their dispossession, murder, and forced assimilation. The Doctrine fueled white supremacy insofar as white European settlers claimed they were instruments of divine design and possessed cultural superiority.
The Doctrine of Discovery was the inspiration in the 1800s for the Monroe Doctrine, which declared U.S. hegemony over the Western Hemisphere, and Manifest Destiny, which justified American expansion westward by propagating the belief that the U.S. was destined to control all land from the Atlantic to the Pacific and beyond.
THE DOCTRINE OF DISCOVERY IN U.S. LAW
In 1823, the Christian Doctrine of Discovery was quietly adopted into U.S. law by the Supreme Court in the celebrated case, Johnson v. McIntosh (8 Wheat., 543). Writing for a unanimous court, Chief Justice John Marshall observed that Christian European nations had assumed "ultimate dominion" over the lands of America during the Age of Discovery, and that - upon "discovery" - the Indians had lost "their rights to complete sovereignty, as independent nations," and only retained a right of "occupancy" in their lands. In other words, Indians nations were subject to the ultimate authority of the first nation of Christendom to claim possession of a given region of Indian lands. [Johnson:574; Wheaton:270-1]
According to Marshall, the United States - upon winning its independence in 1776 - became a successor nation to the right of "discovery" and acquired the power of "dominion" from Great Britain. [Johnson:587-9] Of course, when Marshall first defined the principle of "discovery," he used language phrased in such a way that it drew attention away from its religious bias, stating that "discovery gave title to the government, by whose subject, or by whose authority, the discovery was made, against all other European governments." [Johnson:573-4] However, when discussing legal precedent to support the court's findings, Marshall specifically cited the English charter issued to the explorer John Cabot in March of 1496, in order to document England's "complete recognition" of the Doctrine of Discovery. [Johnson:576] Then, paraphrasing the language of the charter, Marshall noted that Cabot was authorized to take possession of lands, "notwithstanding the occupancy of the natives, who were heathens, and, at the same time, admitting the prior title of any Christian people who may have made a previous discovery." [Johnson:577]. The charter further said,
“John and his sons or their heirs and deputies may conquer, occupy and possess whatsoever such towns, castles, cities and islands by them thus discovered that they may be able to conquer, occupy and possess, as our vassals and governors lieutenants and deputies therein, acquiring for us the dominion, title and jurisdiction of the same towns, castles, cities, islands and mainlands so discovered;”
In other words, the Court affirmed that United States law was based on a fundamental rule of the "Law of Nations" - that it was permissible to virtually ignore the most basic rights of indigenous "heathens," and to claim that the "unoccupied lands" of America rightfully belonged to discovering Christian European nations.
Of course, it's important to understand that, as Benjamin Munn Ziegler pointed out in The International Law of John Marshall, the term "unoccupied lands" referred to "the lands in America which, when discovered, were 'occupied by Indians' but 'unoccupied' by Christians." [Ziegler:46]
Ironically, the same year that the Johnson v. McIntosh decision was handed down, founding father James Madison wrote: "Religion is not in the purview of human government. Religion is essentially distinct from civil government, and exempt from its cognizance; a connection between them is injurious to both."
Most of us have been brought up to believe that the United States Constitution was designed to keep church and state apart. Unfortunately, with the Johnson decision, the Christian Doctrine of Discovery was not only written into U.S. law but also became the cornerstone of U.S. Indian policy over the next century.
Your ALL CAPITALIZED NAME
The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State.” (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239) U. S. Supreme Court
According to Common Law Trust Solutions,
“The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT.” (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))
The “CERTIFICATE” from the State Supreme Court:
ONLY authorizes, to practice Law “IN COURTS” as a member of the STATE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT Can ONLY represent WARDS OF THE COURT, INFANTS, PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND (SEE CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, VOLUME 7, SECTION 4.)
A “CERTIFICATE” is not a license to practice law as an occupation, nor to do business as a law firm. The B.A.R. is a non-governmental private association.
The “STATE B.A.R.” card is not a license!!! it is a “union dues card.” ”the “b.a.r.” is a “professional association,” as any union like the actors union, or painters union. no other association, even doctors, issue their own license. all are issued by the state. They are the “London Lawyers’ Guild” in CITY OF LONDON and found by Congress to be a “Communist Organization.” It turns out that Congress wasn’t wrong, it wasn’t stating the greater of the truths. The B.A.R. is a Pirate Ghost Ship.
The “STATE OF…” B.A.R. is an unconstitutional monopoly, an illegal, “Continuing Criminal Enterprise,” in violation of Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the U.S Constitution. There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive branches within a state as the B.A.R. is attempting. “B.A.R.” members have invaded all branches of govt. & are attempting to control de jure governments as agents of a foreign entity!
A great fraud & conspiracy has been perpetrated on the people of America. The American Bar Association/ABA is an offshoot from London Lawyers’ Guild and was established by people with invasive monopolistic goals in mind. In 1909 they incorporated this TRAITOROUS group in the state of Illinois & had the State Legislature (which was under the control of lawyers) pass an unconstitutional law that only members of this powerful union of lawyers, called the “ABA,” could practice law & hold all the key positions in law enforcement & the making of laws. At that time, Illinois became an outlaw state, & for all practical purposes, they seceded from the United States of America.
The biggest part of this is to conceal from the people that all their Statutes, Codes, Rules, Regulations, Policies, Procedures, and even your mortgage fraud, yes the fraud, is copyrighter, patented, and with your approval [!?!]. It’s NOT A LICENSE! It’s all about privileges in a very private corporation called “STATE OF…” “STATE OF VIRGINIA” is a franchise/subdivision of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 4, DBA, and not to be confused with the Republic, or Virginia, which is a State.
CAPITIS DIMINUTIO MAXIMA – ALL CAPS – THE VOICE OF THE DEAD -CORPORATIONS – “STATE OF…” – JOHN. H. DOE
In Roman law, A diminishing or abridgment of personality. Tills was a loss or curtailment of a man’s status or aggregate of legal attributes and qualifications, following upon certain changes in his civil condition. It was of three kinds, enumerated as follows: Capitis diminutio maxima. The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man’s condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights. Capitis diminutio media. A lesser or medium loss of status. This occurred where a man lost his rights of citizenship, but without losing his liberty. It carried away also the family rights. Capitis diminutio minima. Tile lowest or least comprehensive degree of loss of status. This occurred where a man’s family relations alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation of a person who had been his own master, (sui juris,) or upon the emancipation of one who had been under the patria potestas. It left the rights of liberty and citizenship unaltered. See Inst. 1, 1G, pr.; 1, 2, 3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld. Rom. Law. Law Dictionary: What is CAPITIS DIMINUTIO? definition of CAPITIS DIMINUTIO (Black’s Law Dictionary)
The “B.A.R. ASSOCIATION” sent organizers to all the other states & explained to the lawyers there how much more profitable & secure it would be for them, as lawyers, to join this union & be protected by its bylaws & cannons. They issued to the lawyers in each state a charter from the Illinois organization. California joined in 1927 & a few reluctant states & their lawyers waited until the 1930’s to join when the treasonous Act became DE FACTO & the Citizen’s became captives.
The people were ATTORNED over to serve the Crown as U.S. citizen slaves. This is enticement to slavery and/or “press-ganging.” Debt slaves are held as surety for the debt by the B.A.R.
Under this system, the lawyers could guarantee prejudged decisions for the privileged class against the lower class. This was all made possible by the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION to favor the right & have unlawfully substituted them in place of Constitutional Laws. The Constitution was written in plain English and the Statutes passed by Congress were also in plain English, with the intent of Congress how each law should be used & not the opinions of various Judges as the codes list. Any normal person can read the Constitution & Statutes & understand them without any trouble.
The “public” in California was shocked to learn that the State Government has no control or jurisdiction over the B.A.R. Assoc. or its members. The state does not accredit the law schools or hold B.A.R. examinations. They do not issue state licenses to Lawyers. The B.A.R. Association accredits all the law schools, holds their private examinations & selects the students they will accept in their organization & issues them so-called license but keeps the fees for themselves. The B.A.R. is the only one that can punish or “disbar” a Lawyer.
They also select the Lawyers that they consider qualified for Judgeships & various other offices in the State. Only the B.A.R. Association, or their designated committees, can remove any of these lawyers from public office. The State Legislature will not change this system as they are also a designated committee of the B.A.R. On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of the California State Supreme Court, another of the B.A.R. Associations Judicial Committee’s, stated in essence, that the B.A.R. should determine the legality of all initiatives before they were allowed to go on the ballot. They’re like an underground tide, sneaking in, every day, as undercover of the dark, creeping and intertwining and invading every process into their tentacles of presumption to control America. In no uncertain terms, the B.A.R. is really a subversive and malignant cancer to America as well as the enemy of the people. Quite often, the Chairman of House and Senate “Judiciary” Committees are Crown Temple B.A.R. Attornies. Did you elect an Agent of the Crown for your “STATE OF…?”
This is contrary to both State & Federal Constitutions, as well as the Laws of this Nation instituted “By & For the People” as a Sovereign UNITY of Independent States of We The People, not a fraudulent Corporate entity of Lawyers. This is a tremendous amount of power for a PRIVATE union that is incorporated & headquartered in Illinois to hold over the “Citizens of California” or any other state. The only recourse is through this initiative process & vote by the people for the State, so do NOT vote for Crown Temple B.A.R. Agents. Avoid the deception. You don’t know any Attorneys who aren’t sworn to the Crown, because if they aren’t, they’d be telling you what you’re reading in this missive.
After the “Founding Fathers,” (founders of the debt charter for the King) had formed the bankruptcy document called the Constitution, outlining the laws as to the way our “govt.” was to be run, Thomas Jefferson said, in essence, “This proves that plain people, if given the chance, can enact laws & run a “government” as well as or better than royalty & the blue bloods of Europe.” The American people must stop thinking that lawyers are better than they are & can do a better job than they can before the courts of America.
Under the Common Law & the Laws of America, nowhere is it expressly given for anyone to have the power or the right to form a Corporation. “Corporations” are given “birth” because of ignorance on the part of the American people and are operating under implied consent & power which they have usurped & otherwise stolen from the people. By right and law they have NO power, authority, or jurisdiction, and must be put out of business by the good Citizens of America in their fight for freedom.
The Constitution GUARANTEES to every state in this union a REPUBLICAN form of government. Any other form of government is FORBIDDEN. No public officer or branch of government can be limited to a RULING CLASS of any kind, or the states become ARISTOCRACIES and NOT Republics. Also, the lawyers have made themselves First Class Citizens, where many public offices and branches of government are open to lawyers only. Why? Because it’s not a “government.” They’re operating a government over the District of Columbia, and extending their jurisdiction over the Crown Territory in the Treaty of Paris/Peace. It’s one thing for them to be enforcing corporate policy, but they have suckered Americans into their jurisdiction so they can rob their energy by way of massive taxes, and enslavement.
ALL OTHER PEOPLE ARE LIMITED TO ONLY TWO BRANCHES OF THIS TWISTED FORM OF GOVERNMENT, AND ONLY TO CERTAIN OFFICES IN THOSE TWO BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT, MAKING ALL PEOPLE WHO ARE NON-LAWYERS INTO SECOND CLASS SUBJECT CITIZENS.
When the courts belong to the people, as the United States Constitution REQUIRES, (Art. IV, § 4, we the people, will NEVER rule against themselves.) In these unconstitutional foreign tribunals “courts” (hoodlum centers), “men” in black dresses, that are unconstitutional ROBES OF NOBILITY. (Art. 1, §§ 9 & 10) dispense a perverted ideology, where the people are terrorized by members of the BLACK ROBE CULT (B.A.R. Lawyers and Lawyer judges in the courtrooms).
The real cause for the War of 1812, FOREIGN AGENTS with TITLES: Article XIII “If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any Emperor, King, Prince, or foreign Power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”
The legislative branch of government does NOT have the Constitutional Power to issue Court Orders or any other kind of Orders to the people, as a “fiction court” or a “court/corporation for profit & gain” cannot reach parity with a lawful man. ONLY Presidents & Governors have the Constitutional Power to grant PARDONS, but Lawyers and Lawyer-Judges are unconstitutionally granting PARDONS with “immunity from prosecution.” This is not really what’s commonly known as “legislating from the bench.” It’s Administrating from the bench, because the de facto is not a constitutional government at all. It’s an Executive/Administrative, Martial Law Rule Military Tribunal. They’re Bankers. They’re Brokers. People CAN and SHOULD prosecute them because we are not Crown Subjects. We are State Citizens, and not responsible for their fictitious corporate Monopoly Game, even if they wish to coerce us into the OFFICE OF THE PERSON.
Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts. The Citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill out fancy lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law; that he does not know court rules and procedures; etc… This is unconstitutional “lawyer system,” only HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES (lawyers) NOT under oath, have access to the fiction/for profit & gain courts, even though ONLY sworn testimony & evidence can be presented in court. Anything else is “Bill of Attainder,” NOT permitted under the U.S. Constitution (Article 1, Sections 9 & 10).
The U.S. Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to counsel, or the right to any other hearsay substitute. The 6th Amendment is very specific, that the accused ONLY has the right to the ASSISTANCE of counsel and this assistance of counsel can be anyone the accused chooses without limitation. Only a STATE EMPLOYEE/U.S. citizen can be forced into having a B.A.R. Attorner because the U.S. citizen is a DEAD entity, with no standing in Law, as the INCOMPETENT IMBECILE/WARD OF THE STATE. This is not a joke.
Lawyers and Lawyer/Judges created unconstitutional “lawyer system” of pre-trial “motions” and “hearings” to have eternal extortionistic litigations, which is BARRATRY and also is in violation of the U.S. Constitution, and Art. 1, as this places defendants in double jeopardy a 100x over. Defendants only have a right to a trial, not trials. When a criminal is freed on a technicality, he is freed because of a fix and a pay-off, as a defendant can only be freed if found innocent by a “jury” not by any “technicality.”
Whenever a lawyer is involved in a case directly or indirectly, as a litigant or assisting in counsel, all Lawyer/Judges have to disqualify themselves, as there cannot be a constitutional trial & also there would be a violation of the conflict of interest laws, along with the violation of separation of powers and checks and balances, because “officers” of the court are on both sides of the bench.
These same Lawyer/Judges are awarding or approving Lawyer/Attorner fees, directly & indirectly, amounting to billion of dollars annually, all in violation of conflict of interest laws. As long as there are lawyers, there will never be any law, Constitution or Justice. There will only be MOB RULE, RULE BY A MOB OF LAWYERS. Remember, you are not a CORPORATION, or a DEAD entity, PERSON/U.S. citizen, so make sure you do NOT act like one.
Case “law” (history, not law) is unconstitutional: As case “law” is enacted by the judicial branch of government . When a Lawyer/Judge instructs, directs, or gives orders to a jury, the Lawyer-Judge is TAMPERING WITH THE JURY. He also tampers with testimony when he orders the answers to be either “Yes” or “No.” The Lawyer-Judge also tampers, fixes, & rigs the trial when he orders anything stricken from the record, or when he “rules” certain evidence & the truth to be inadmissible.
This makes the trial and transcript fixed and rigged, because the jury does not hear the real truth and all the facts. Juries are made into puppets by the Lawyers and Lawyer/Judges. All Lawyers are automatically in the judicial branch of government, as they have the unconstitutional TITLE OF NOBILITY (Article 1, Section 9 & 10), “Officer of the Court.” Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch of government, but non-lawyer Citizens are limited to only two of the three branches of government. Lawyers, as First Class citizens, can be hired or elected to any of the three branches of government. Again, in violation of the Constitution and additionally and specifically again in Article XIII.
They’re not just doing this to corporations. They’re doing this to people, which seriously means that every “Judge” who does exactly this, and they almost all do, is a most loathsome of characters. Anyone with a reasonable mind can see that B.A.R. Attorners/Lawyers/Judges are truly despicable people with big smiles, who are nice to their friends and families sometimes, but in reality, they’re criminal bastards, and that’s an understatement. Piracy is to be punishable by death.
Lawyers, “Officers of the Court,” in the Judicial Branch, are unconstitutionally in two branches of government at the SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected to the executive or legislative branches. This is a violation of the separation of powers, checks & balances, and the conflict of interest laws. District Attorneys & State’s Attorneys have taken over the Grand Juries FROM the people, where the people are denied access to the Grand Juries when they attempt to present evidence of crimes committed in the courtrooms by the lawyers & lawyer-judges. This can be explained very easily! A State/Republic has a Constitution, but nowhere in many is the provision for a County Attorney to be in the Crown Temple B.A.R., but the B.A.R. Attorners who get themselves elected, then produce baseless Legislation requiring the County Attorner to be a member of the B.A.R. This is one of the greatest usurpations and treasonous acts that these criminals could do to the people because the County Attorney makes the presentments to the Grand Jury. This is how the Chief Justice of the STATE OF…, the CORPORATION, wrests control of the Grand Jury away from the people. Also, this is how the despicable B.A.R. brings/coerces COMMERCIAL CODE upon living men, although they’re foreclosed from parity with the tangible/living. Again, these are criminal pirates, robbing you of your rights, sweat, land, property, family, and life.
The U.S. Constitution, being the Supreme Fundamental Law, is not and cannot be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless piece of paper & we would have millions of interpretations (unconstitutional amendments) instead of the few we have now. That is why all Judges and public servants are SWORN TO SUPPORT the U.S. Constitution, NOT interpret it.
Beyond their arrogant crimes of “interpreting” law, they change the form of language to “Legalese” which is word magic with God’s Law, the Word. Definition : “Legal: the undoing of God’s law.” 1893 Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, Encyclopedia Britannica, a dictionary of arts, sciences and general literature / The R. S. Peale 9th 1893
Under International Orders: All Lawyers, whether they left law school yesterday or 50 years ago, are EXACTLY THE SAME. All Lawyers have to file the same motions/pleadings and follow the same procedures in using the same unconstitutional “Lawyer system.” In probate, the Lawyers place themselves in everyone’s will & estate. When there are minor children as heirs, the Lawyer-Judges appoint a lawyer (a child molesting Fagin) for EACH CHILD and, at times, the Lawyer fees EXCEED the total amount of the estate. If you’re paying attention, you’re seeing that the B.A.R. Attorners are robbing your family, even to the point of kidnapping them from you. This is press-ganging at it’s most filthy, and is punishable by death. Can you see why the Crown Temple B.A.R. wishes to keep themselves out of jurisdiction of the people under Common Law? It’s because they could and should be hanged for their Shang Hai enslavement.
An outrageous amount of tax “money” is directly & indirectly STOLEN by Lawyers. Money that is budgeted to County/City/Borough Boards, School Boards & other local & Federal agencies eventually finds its way into the pockets of lawyers, as ALL of these agencies are “tricked” & “forced” into eternal “extortionists” litigation, also they rob everything and everyone vis the theft of all the elastic currency created by these municipalities. This can be found in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports/ CAFR records. To see the privacy and fraud, visit www.cafr1.com
In the STATES OF ALASKA AND HAWAII, the Crown Temple B.A.R. ASSOCIATION. has mandated that all judges are to be licensed to practice law (e.g. Alaska Constitution, Art. IV, Sec. 4). This license requirement is not found in any other state of the Union. As all licenses to practice law in the STATES OF ALASKA & HAWAII are issued by a Judge, what Judge is qualified to issue a license to practice law to another Judge? As only members of the B.A.R. may be licensed to practice law (e.g. A.S. 08.08.020), STATES OF ALASKA AND HAWAII judges are unlawfully REQUIRED to be members of the B.A.R. & as such, they are prejudiced to do the business of the B.A.R. If a Judge is required to be a member of the B.A.R., who disqualifies the Judge from office if that Judge does not pay the dues or violates the rules of the B.A.R? Every state in the Union (with the exception of Alaska & Hawaii) “prohibits” Judges from holding licenses to practice law.”
