The Black Liberation Movement (BLM), Balanta, Rastafari, and America's Drug War: Chicago Police Attacks on January 27, 1997 and August 6, 1999

Bonsamkomfo.jpg

“Providing successive generations with the opportunities and circumstances to identify their mission, obtain the necessary training to fulfill their mission and provide the support needed through these steps are vital in ensuring that successive generations can identify and actualize their missions. This process is based in the Onyame Nhyehye paradigm and is called the Nyansa Nananom process, which means ‘ancestral wisdom.’ Leadership is learned under the tutelage of one’s elders and through meaningful experiences.”

- Council of Independent Black Institutions (CIBI) Final Newspaper

On my recruiting trip to Yale University in 1989, I had a mystical “out-of-body” experience in the Kiphuth Pool inside the Payne Whitney Gymnasium. My ancestors told me to enroll at Yale.

In 1993, my ancestors told me to leave Yale, two months before graduation. They needed me. They had a mission for me. They did not want me to become a tool of white supremacy by working in corporate America and integrating into their system. No. The ancestors needed me to become a freedom fighter, a revolutionary. I did not know it at the time, but they needed me to gather the scattered Balanta people who were taken from their homeland.

Panther Bulldog Solidarity.JPG

I left Yale and looked for The Revolution. My journey started with the Black Panther Party in New Haven. One of its devoted members from the 1960’s, George Edwards, was still active and became my mentor.

George Edwards on the steps of the Superior Court in New Haven, CT

George Edwards on the steps of the Superior Court in New Haven, CT

However, there was no Black Panther Party to really speak of in 1995. Yale officials, including members of the Afro Am House, discouraged students from getting involved with “crazy George”. But I spent more and more time with him.

I joined Union Local 34’s strike against Yale University, demanding a living wage for its mostly black workforce and spoke at University forums, marched on the picket lines, and along with a group of students, boycotted my graduation ceremony at Yale.

I began writing articles in Akili, the black student newspaper at Yale.

Siphiwe at Yale Forum for Strike.JPG
Akili magazine 1.JPG
Akili magazine 2.JPG

George showed me how to get resources from Yale University and use them to support political prisoners, most of whom were aging Black Panthers or BLM soldiers. Through George, I made contact with the International Concerned Family and Friends of Mumia Abu-Jamal and organized three days of activities on the Yale campus for the National Day of Student Protest in Support of Mumia Abu-Jamal. After the event, a group of students approached me and told me that FBI agents had come to their dorm and were asking questions about me. That’s when I first became aware of FBI surveillance that George warned me about.

Mumia Flyer.JPG
How Long Shall They Kill Our Prophets at Yale.jpeg

I eventually left New Haven. I attended a Political Prisoners Conference in Boston and met up with Pam Afrika again. Then I went to Philadelphia to work with MOVE. I learned all about the August 8, 1978 confrontation as well as the bombing of MOVE. Pam and Ramona Africa talked to me about MOVE people and John Afrika and I read all of the MOVE First Day Newspapers that taught me the strategy of JOHN AFRICA who said,

“IT IS PAST TIME FOR ALL POOR PEOPLE TO RELEASE THEMSELVES FROM THE DECEPTIVE STRANGULATION OF SOCIETY. THE SYSTEM HAS FAILED YOU YESTERDAY, FAILED YOU TODAY AND HAVE CREATED THE CONDITIONS FOR FAILURE TOMORROW. THE LAWYERS ARE JUST AS CORRUPT AS THE THE JUDGES THEY CONFRONT. THEY ARE HARVARD AND PRINCETON AND CORNELL AND YALE TRAINED AS THE JUDGE TO DECEIVE THE IMPOVERISHED. TRAINED AS THE JUDGE TO PROTECT THE ESTABLISHED, TRAINED BY THE SYSTEM TO BE AS THE SYSTEM, TO DO FOR THE SYSTEM, EXPLOIT WITH THE SYSTEM.”

By the time I found MOVE, they were focused on freeing their nine brothers and sisters that were in jail, the MOVE 9, as well as Mumia Abu-Jamal. But what I was looking for was the same kind of atmosphere that MOVE had in the late 1970’s and that time had past. I still had not found The Revolution I was looking for.

Shaka Barak as I remember him

Shaka Barak as I remember him

Eventually I returned to Chicago. There I started working with Shaka Barak (Aonde T Dansby), founder and President of the Marcus Garvey Institute, Former UNIA 3rd Assistant President General and Minister of Education, and one of the last students of General Charles L James of Gary, Indiana. General James was one of the original graduates of Marcus Garvey’s School of African Philosophy in 1937. Garvey reported to the readers of the December 1937 Black Man:

The School of African Philosophy has come into existence after twenty-three years of the Association's life for the purpose of preparing and directing the leaders who are to create and maintain the great institution that has been founded and carried on during a time of intensified propaganda work. The philosophy of the school embodies the most exhaustive outlines of the manner in which the Negro should be trained to project a civilization of his own and to maintain it.

According to General James,

“The class became one family. We ate together, roomed together, studied together, recognizing the professor as the chief architect of our intellectual destiny. As for me, it was a dose of humility mixed with the yearning for knowledge. For thirty days and nights, with two sessions per day, mass meetings at 8 o’clock p.m., studying until the early morning hours, we had no time for anything else but study, study, study. Then, finally, came graduation. Let the record show that I received the highest grade. In every point of examination I was graded ‘E'. My classmates all agree that I was the leader of the first class in the School of African Philosophy. We were charged with guarding the written course with our lives. The unwritten course was to be engraved on the tablets of our memory. As I write this, I am sorry to announce that all my classmates of that first class have joined with the Rt. Excellent Marcus Mosiah Garvey and our other ancestors. . . . As the only surviving graduate of the first class, it is important for me to protect the interest of those who preceded me into eternity and knowing that there are forces that are trying to distort history . . . Let me hope that into whomsoever’s hands these lessons fall, that they may use them wisely. For in these lessons there is eternal life for Africans at home and abroad. . . .”


With Shaka Barak, I completed the Course of the School of African Philosophy. This I considered to be my Graduate studies in Philosophy and I now had a B.A. Degree in Philosophy from Yale University and an M.S. Degree in African Liberation from Marcus Garvey’s School of African Philosophy. Baba Shaka and I did a few projects together at Kennedy King College and he introduced me to elder Silas K. Brown. The three of us produced the booklet, Consumer Education: What is It? The Teachings of Silas K Brown. We also made several appearances on Silas’ WKKC weekly radio show, the Consumers’ Eye.

During this time I also found Baba Hannibal Afrik, a former leader of the Republic of New Afrika’s military forces, who at that time was President of the Chicago Chapter of the National Coalition of Blacks for Reparations in America (NCOBRA).

Baba Hannibal Afrik 1.jpg
Baba Hannibal Afrik 5.jpg
Three images of Elder Baba Hannibal Afrik

Three images of Elder Baba Hannibal Afrik

At the time of Baba Hannibal’s transition to the ancestor realm, the Final Call newspaper stated,

“Baba Hannibal Afrik, born Harold E. Charles, departed this life June 27, after a lifetime of work for the freedom and development of Black people. The Chicago schoolteacher, instructor at Northeastern Illinois University in Chicago and longtime activist was man on a right course.

During funeral services here July 9, the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan and family and friends of “Baba Hannibal” remembered him in services punctuated by a spirit of joy.

The Minister noted that the man and woman who find their purpose and fulfill it are indeed blessed individuals. He credited Baba Hannibal, a Nationalist and Pan Africanist, with helping him to find his purpose. When some wanted to take my life, it was Baba Hannibal and others who stood with me, the Minister said, recalling the late 1970s and early 1980s as he sought to rebuild the Nation of Islam.

Baba Hannibal worked with anyone who was about the business of progress for Black people, the Minister said, offering one of many lessons to be gleaned from the life of this great scholar, educator, institution builder and freedom fighter.

Labels did not deter Baba Hannibal from finding the path to unity and seeking to build a separate and independent nation for Black people, which is line with the will of God, Min. Farrakhan added.”

I started attending NCOBRA meetings led by Baba Hannibal and Erline Arpo at the Washington Park Field House on the south-side of Chicago but soon became frustrated. Most of those who attended the meetings were elders and they no longer seemed militant to me. There was no “action” and I didn’t see any of my peers. In my book, From Yale To Rastafari: Letter to My Mom, 1995-1998 I wrote,

“I met Hondo (member of the Spear & Shield Collective and publisher of their Crossroads underground newsletter) the last time I was in Chicago, back in 1995. He was the only dreadlocked brother at the Sunday afternoon National Coalition of Blacks for Reparations in America (NCOBRA) meetings. I remember vaguely him telling me about this radical community school that was trying to throw safe, weekly parties for the youth. On our way to the Dixon Correctional Center to visit political prisoner Atiba Sana, we talked about the challenges of community work smack in the middle of heavy gang-activity. . . . Crazy as I was, I was attracted to it. Having been one of a handful of black students in a rural Chicago suburb, and later at Yale University, I was after what Marcus Garvey calls a “racial re-education.” I saw it as a manifestation of God’s will when Hondo picked me up at Chicago’s Union Station and drove me to political education class (PE Class) at the Nkrumah Washington Community Learning Center (NWCLC). About the man who governs the center and would become my mentor, Hondo had only one thing to say – he’s intense!

Crossroads Vol Six #1 published by Brother Hondo

Crossroads Vol Six #1 published by Brother Hondo

Spear and Shield Collective.JPG
NWCLC rooms for rent.JPG

I quickly found out exactly what he meant. After introducing me to Irish “El-Amin” Greene, I was invited to sit in PE Class. For the next four hours, El-Amin talked – fast, loud and hard. His voice is neither deep nor soft. It is full of a thousand clear and emancipated thoughts travelling at a thousand miles a second. . . . El-Amin offered me a place to stay. . . . I was especially excited to have access to their cases of books on black, African and world history. . . .If I was scared then, I was absolutely frightened by the prospect of the future – less jobs, less money, no welfare, more people, more prisons, more babies being raised without any adult guidance, more drugs, guns and homegrown militias and terrorists amid the backdrop of global imperialism and the threat of a nuclear Holocaust, all started by the genocide of African Americans by white supremacists in the U.S. and its government. There was little difference to me between the area around 51st Street and Ada and pictures I saw of Liberia, Sierra Leone and Zaire. I remember vividly as El-Amin walked me around the neighborhood pointing out lines of gang demarcation. He showed me houses in the area and introduced me to the families that lived in ratted out, broken down houses in the area and introduced me to the families that lived in them. . . . If I needed to prove myself, a black revolutionary intellectual from Yale University, going to the Moes in the heart of the Black P Stone Nation and working to politicize the gangs as part of the international liberation struggle was the best way to do it.

El Amin had begun to direct my studies towards the law. Taking me to its old location, El-Amin explained to me the history of the National Council of Black Lawyers Community College of Law and International Diplomacy where he used to work. He provided documents about its co-founders Dr. Charles Knox and Dr. Y.N. Kly, both distinguished experts in international law and diplomacy, and provided me with textbooks on the U.N. and its procedures. One book in particular would change my life the way the Autobiography of Malcolm X had done: International Law and the Black Minority in the U.S. by Dr. Y.N. Kly. Along with another of his books, The Black Book (which details Malcolm X’s program to internationalize our struggle through the Organization of Afro American Unity), I gained some clarity on what must be done and what I must do, in order to gain relief from genocide and win reparations. I thus began writing Ras Notes: Conceptualizing Our Case for the U.N. At this time, I established communication with Dr. Kly’s International Human Rights Association of American Minorities (IHRAAM) and UHRAAP. I then began researching U.N. resolutions through the internet at DePaul University, and obtaining articles, petitions, and reports from NGO’s concerning our case. From these I began drafting the Petition of the Nkrumah-Washington Community Learning Center on Behalf of their Members, Associates and Afro-American Population Whose Internationally Protected Human Rights Have Been Grossly and Systematically Violated By the Anglo-American Government of the United States of America and Its Varied Institutions.”

By that time, IHRAAM had facilitated communications between the National Organizing Committee for the Million Man March based in Chicago and were preparing for an intervention at a meeting of the UN Working Group on Minorities, May 26-30, 1997. At NWCLC, I was being trained to become the next generation’s international legal advocate for African American self determination.

Concerning Dr. Knox and the National Council of Black Lawyers Community College of Law and International Diplomacy, Natalie Y. Moore and Lance Williams write in their book, The Almighty Black P Stone Nation: The Rise, Fall and Resurgence of an American Gang,

“During the time Farrakhan busied himself resurrecting the new NOI, he used various venues around the city of Chicago to hold meetings with his followers, including the Black Lawyers’ Community College of Law and International Diplomacy at 4545 South Drexel. Farrakhan’s friend activist Charles Knox had established the school in 1979.

Knox taught at Northeastern Illinois University’s Center for Inner City Studies. Not only did he have strong ties to Black Nationalists, Knox had an equally strong connection with Chicago street gangs. The leadership of the Stones, Lords, and Disciples respected him. Knox allowed Farrakhan and the NOI to use the Black Lawyers’ College as a meeting place, and he also let the El Rukns host activities there. It was through Knox that Farrakhan and Chief Malik (Jeff Fort) became acquainted. . . .

The National College of Black Lawyers, an old converted mansion just a few blocks away from The Fort, was controversial because it had no accreditation and investigations alleged El Rukn business took place in the facility.

Dr Knox.JPG
Dr Knox3Jet magazine.JPG
NCBL Law School.JPG
Dr Knox2.JPG

So I went from a somewhat stale environment at NCOBRA to the intense and frightening environment at the Nkrumah Washington Community Learning Center (NWCLC) in the heart of gang territory in Chicago.

In another excerpt in From Yale To Rastafari: Letter to My Mom, 1995-1998 I wrote,

“ I took the biggest room in the attic and moved in some stuff. I was especially excited to have access to their cases of books on black, African and world history. I also looked forward to listening more to El-Amin and “fitting in”. Here, I presumed, would be further “racial re-education” as Marcus Garvey put it. I was scared shitless when on Fridays everyone would come over to watch movies, dance, gamble, drink, smoke blunts, and fuck. Straight up in ya face. Gradually, I would come to see some of what’s behind it all – underdevelopment, realities of gang life, prison life, and ghetto “hood” life, the desire to enjoy life in spite of it all, psychology of NIGGAZ . . .  Never before had I been somewhere where one was supposed to leave the car doors unlocked in case it was necessary to run to the car and speed away from the police, another gang, a store owner, or your own family – uh, did I say the police? Once I had my grill busted (took a violation) for leaving a brother at the store – three blocks away! . . . .

Because they were also trying to provide general education, cultural education, and leadership training, I was attracted to their NWCLC institution and volunteered to “do whatever I could” to contribute. I would come to find my niche on the computer. Because of my research and desktop publishing skills, I immediately began reading the institutions materials. This led naturally to publishing the Nkrumah-Washington Sceptre and to updating and writing grant proposal. These things I did from my heart because I valued my continued development in these areas which were being well served at NWCLCI.

El-Amin was concerned, however, that I receive compensation for my efforts, lest at some time in the future, I should feel taken advantage of. He found various ways to employ me and contribute to my development all at the same time. Some community members needed “pluggers” for their parties. We did them on the computer. Others needed resumes. We did them on the computers. Some needed letter for their probation officers. We did them on the computers. As there were so many students running in and out of the building, it was necessary to make I.D. cards. We did them on the computer. For each thing we charged a little bit of money – a dollar or two – and I found I had enough money to eat and thus I found myself with food, clothing plus a job helping my community and free classes and free books. . .

Thus, began my education in business, institution building and community affairs. I abandoned my newsletter, Awake & Aware right in the middle of the December 25th edition, and devoted all my faculties to NWCLC. . . . I was responsible for securing and introducing a canon BJ620 color bubble jet printer and a Hewlett Packard ScanJet 4p scanner to NWCLC. . . .I had planned to use the equipment to earn money preparing proposals, resumes, “pluggers”, business cards, etc. . . .

Volume 1, Issue 1 of the Nkrumah-Washington Sceptre came out in December 1996. At this time, I also drafted my first grant proposal, setting forth the foundation of my work with NWCLC. This grant proposal was for technical assistance in the form of $1,000 from the Crossroad Fund. This money was to fund the Serious Action for Goals in Education (SAGE) project. The project had two branches: the Library Upgrade Project (Look UP) and the Stepping Into The Information Age Project (SIIAP). Their aim was development of human and material resources in information age technology (computers) and management information systems. [I also wrote] individual proposals for the Black United Fund ($3,000), the Northern Charitable Trust ($?000), the UPN-Advocacy Awards ($25,000), Albert Pick Jr. Fund ($2,500) and updated and resubmitted the existing Girl’s Best Friend proposal ($10,000).

During my last semester at Yale I had begun scanning images and manipulating them, adding text and creating page layouts. I used this process to desktop-publish my senior essay as well as to raise money for Mumia Abu-Jamal. I was eager to use the vast resources in NWCLC library to further this effort. I did not, however, anticipate the heavy competition to use the equipment, nor the variety and magnitude of the distractions from development. I grew frustrated at having to wait until early morning hours to find peaceful, quiet time to contemplate and work on the computer. Nevertheless, everybody began learning fast, especially El-Amin, Mordecai, and myself. El-Amin focused on using the scanner and computer disks as copying and storing mediums. He began scanning all the school’s records, pictures, etc. Mordecai focused first on the scanning software and later on computer hardware and upgrades. I continued to focus on desktop publishing.”

On January 27, 1997 the Nkrumah-Washington Community Learning Center was raided by the Chicago Police, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), the Secret Service and special Gang Task Force.

Our computer equipment was seized and PE Classes stopped. While being detained and question, the ATF officers informed me that we had been under surveillance for a long time and that they could tell me every conversation that I had in the past two weeks. Irish El-Amin Greene, the Center’s founder and director, was being charged with “counterfeiting.” They told me that they knew I wasn’t involved, but that I was still facing up to fifteen years in prison if it went to court and that I could prevent this by cooperating with their investigation. My exact words to them were, “Mr. Greene has taught me more and helped me more than any professor at Yale. Whatever I can do to help Mr. Greene I am going to do to help him.” And that was the end of our conversation.

The case went to court and we conducted our own defense. The investigators did in fact find images of money scanned into our computers, but none of the images contained both a front and a back of the same size. Our defense was that we used the images to promote our parties. El Amin had me go all over Chicago taking pictures of Moneygram’s advertising campaign. On billboards and park benches all across the city, Moneygram’s campaign showed twenty dollar bills and stated, “It’s All About The Benjamins!” Our defense was simple: If Moneygram could use images of money for their advertising campaign, why couldn’t NWCLC use the same images to advertise its parties? Greene was found not guilty, but the incident disrupted operations at the center and I left to become more involved in the Rastafari movement in Chicago.

El Amin Greene.JPG

At that time, there were a few Rastafari institutions in Chicago. There was the Reggae clubs Wild Hare and Exodus, there was the Rastafari bookstore called Frontline that began in 1987 and was located on 75th Street for fifteen years,, and there was a social club called King Solomon’s Mines. Every year there was a big Haile Selassie I celebration in Washington Park, which was founded in 1974 by Elder Gabriel (Patrick Mickiel Diaz ), one of the earliest Rastas and Nyabinghi drummers from Jamaica and close friend of Bob Marley’s mentor Ras Mortimo Planno (who would become the only man to receive two Gold Medals from Emperor Haile Selassie), and Tzaddi Wadadah Terrier II a.k.a. Selector T. Elder Gabriel was another of my mentors and I lived in his basement for over a year.

At the Haile Selassie festival in 1996 I remember when Mutabaruka said from the stage that Rastas were “talking too much about Africa and not walking enough to get there - Africa is a land, not a state of mind.” That inspired a small group of us to take Repatriation seriously. After the raid on NWCLC, I shifted from political education and black nationalism and began to prepare to return to Ethiopia.

I started hanging out at the Wild Hare, Frontline and King Solomon’s Mines with Ras Sekou Tafari, Abba Kisi, and Jahsyl and learning about Rastafari. I finally found The Revolution I was seeking. The Rastas were militant. They were spiritual. They were political. They were cultural. They were intellectual. They were openly defiant. They were mystical….. I found my peers here, others who were seeking African liberation, and in particular, Repatriation, and were willing to completely commit and order their lives to it. From Rastafari people I learned,

“Haile Selassie I the First, Conquering Man Lion of Judah came TO ORDER THE PEOPLE. The confused mentality that was fostered by Slavery had burned out and the mind had to be set on a course of HIGH ORDER . . . . When one looks at the first inspiration that came to I&I from His Majesty, it was an INSPIRATION through the establishment of IVINE ORDER. It was not an inspiration to create a mere RELIGIOUS MOVEMENT. Neither was it an inspiration to create a mere social movement nor a political movement. The vision was to create an IVINE ORDER OF LIVITY that encompassed ALL aspects of life. . . . Without a Pan-African vision that has as its goal the establishment of Black Nationhood with a restored concept of BLACK ROYALTY AND DIVINITY, the root of the problems that now face Black civilization cannot be rooted out. THE TRUTH MUST BE FACED THAT THE PROBLEMS ARE NOT ONLY ECONOMIC, POLITICAL AND CULTURAL, but they are also SPIRITUAL in the sense of having been subjected to unnaturalness for so long that naturalness becomes an unwelcome stranger. TRAPPED, domesticated and tethered for centuries to the stake of unnaturalness the caged and domesticated creature is apt to lose its spiritual equilibrium and forget what is clean from what is unclean, what is right from what is wrong, and what is high from what is low. This is the condition of the ‘ex-slaves’ in this time, sorely in need of something more than a political movement, something that involves the reshaping of character in the similitude of ROYALTY. . . . If one were to put into one sentence THE MAIN GUIDELINE OF THE NYAHBINGHI ORDER upon which the whole of RASTAFARI IS FOUNDED, it is Resurrection of THE BLACK IDEAL FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACHIEVING BLACK LIBERATION. . .”

Black liberation meant finding an escape from the plantation, from the SYSTEM. I didn’t want to become an economic wage slave so I tried to find strategies that could free my from serving the SYSTEM from 9 am to 5 am every day and having to pay rent. Like my Balanta ancestors who resisted Mandinka and Portuguese oppression by relocating to the mangrove swamps, I relocated to the waste spaces in Chicago and started squatting abandoned building which became my “liberated territories”. I would clean them up and do basic rehab and continue as if I owned the place. My first confrontation with Chicago police concerning my liberated territory took place on July 14, 1997 at 1944 S. California Avenue, Chicago, IL.. I was charged with criminal trespass, but the case was eventually dropped.

In November 1997, I organized the Peoples of Chicago Ad-Hoc Committee in Support of Justice for Mumia Abu-Jamal (PCMAJ) which traveled to Philadelphia on December 4th for the Peoples’ International Tribunal for Justice for Mumia Abu-Jamal held at the Blue Horizon on December 6th. The trip was free to all 11 delegates which included two elders and the Rastafar Livity Nyabinghi Choir. In addition to hanging a large banner of Bob Marley that read, “How Long Shall They Kill Our Prophets?” we drummed and chanted Nyahbinghi during the Tribunal. There, I met Sundiata Sadiq, Gamal Nkrumah (Kwame Nkrumah’s son) and Julia Wright, daughter of famed author Richard Right. I presented a brief outlining international legal arguments and justifications for an international rescue team to rescue Mumia Abu-Jamal from prison to Adekoye Akinwole (Herman Ferguson), a Tribunal Judge, one of the original signers of the Republic of New Afrika’s Declaration of Independence, and the RNA’s first Minister of Education. I had hoped that my brief or parts of it would make it into the Tribunal’s Indictment that was delivered on December 10 to Dr. Purification Quisumbing, Director of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Office in New York.

“ I am concerned,” I said to Baba Adekoye Akinwole, “that should they begin to march brother Mumia to the gas chamber, that no one will attempt to rescue him. I ask you, a member of the Black Liberation Army (BLA), what is to be done?” Baba Adekoye’s response while receiving my brief was,

“The BLA is and always has been, underground. Do not worry.” That was all he said.

Tribunal For Mumia.JPG

By the summer of 1998, our small group began to get ready to leave America to repatriate to Ethiopia. A passage in From Yale To Rastafari: Letter to My Mom, 1995-1998 reads,

“Some other Rastafarians and I have decided to join forces. His Majesty Haile Selassie has given us 500 acres in Shashemane, Ethiopia. Currently there are 60 families there, and, JAH willing, We will be the next group to go and settle the remaining 350 acres. There are six of Us right now – Yahnaq, whom I consider a brother, Zakiyyah, who is like a first wife, Nikelda, her son Alejandro, and Jahneri, Yahnaq’s wife. Everyone wears dreadlocks and is called, chosen and faithful to His Imperial Majesty, Haile Selassie I, King of Kings and Lord of Lords, Conquering Lion of Judah.

We are planning to go forward to Ethiopia at the end of October of this year. We already have half of our gear and plane fare. In order to prepare for our new life, we have been living out of tents in a remote area where we are growing our own food and herbs and learning how to live without modern conveniences like electricity, cooked food, etc. Since our vegetable crops are not ready, we’ve been eating wild foods which I pick everyday – wild lettuce, dandelion leaves, wild carrot, greens, pepper grass, horsetail, blackberries, ground strawberries. We also buy organic fruit (wholesale) as well as hard wheat berries, buckwheat, and nuts, raisins, peanut butter and coconut. We also sprout seeds and legumes. Because everything is fresh, raw and without chemicals, we are getting strong and healthy, . . . .

The air out here is fresh, and I am breathing normally. I can even smell various herbs, flowers, etc. and can tell if someone is cooking miles away! At night we sometimes build a fire and so long as its not raining, we sleep on the ground uncovered and gaze at the celestial bodies moving across the sky.

We have even built huts from saplings, leaves and mud. During the afternoon when it gets hot, we retreat from the fields and take SIESTAS under the huts which are surrounded by forest and a great green canopy. The wind blows gently – a natural air conditioning, the temperature in the huts can be as much as 10 degrees cooler! They also serve as an infirmary and, in addition to cuts and scrapes, I’ve had to treat Zakiyyah for heatstroke. Out here I get to be me – father, brother, architect, doctor, priest, king, entertainer, everything. So, I am very free and happy. It is a great time of preparation for our journey.

I don’t know if I will be coming back to America. It is doubtful. Just thought I’d let you know.”

October came and went and we did not go to Ethiopia. We were not yet ready. We needed another year. At the Haile Selassie Festival in Washington Park in July of 1999, we were were very joyful because we believed we would be going to Ethiopia and escaping “Babylon” in just a few months before the start of the Babylon New Year, January 1, 2000. With Elder Gabriel and all the Rasta people in Chicago, and the conscious black community in Chicago, we camped and celebrated for three nights in Washington Park, singing praises to Haile Selassie and listening to live reggae music. Then something curious and disheartening happened. My backpack with some of our important documents, a large sum of cash, and other things disappeared from my tent. Then two weeks later, I was ambushed by the Chicago police. Below is the account contained in my records.

I. Charges

Sometime after midnight in the early morning of Friday, August 6, 1999, I, Ras Nathaniel Afrika Tafari (as I was known then) was ticketed for parking on city property, driving without insurance and failure to produce a drivers’s license. I was also arrested and charged with 839 grams of cannabis sativa, a violation of Illinois Criminal Statue 720550/4 of the Cannabis Control Act.

According to Section 550/3(a) of the Act,

“Cannabis” includes marijuana, hashish and other substances which are identified as including any parts of the plant Cannabis Sativa, whether growing or not; the seeds thereof, the resin extracted from any part of such preparation of such plant, its seeds, or resin, including tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and all other cannabinol derivatives, including its naturally occurring or synthetically produced ingredients, whether produced directly or indirectly by extraction, or independently by a combination of extraction and chemical synthesis; but shall not include the mature stalks of such plant, fiber produced from stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination.

Section 550/4(e) states that

“more than 500 grams but not more than 2,000 grams of any substance containing cannabis is guilty of a Class 3 felony.”

II. Ras Nathaniel’s Statement

What follows below is my account of what happened on the night of August 5th. I swear by the True and Living Almighty God JAH RASTAFARI that what follows is true to the best of my knowledge.

On Thursday night, August 5th, 1999, I Ras Iyah, Nehemia and her three youths, and Ella were running errands in my Ford E150 van. It was late when we finally gathered Ella’s belongings which were in storage at a sistrin’s house. As we were exhausted from our efforts, we decided to find a nice, quiet secluded space where we could rest. I suggested that we go to a spot on the beach (the South Cove next to Rainbow Beach just south of the water treatment plant on 79th Street) where I had rested before without being molested.

When we arrived at the beach sometime around midnight, we were all delighted and awed at the yellow waning moon hanging low n the eastern horizon. We felt blessed and thankful to have such a nice place to rest.

After a few minutes, we decided to eat and we began making sandwiches. I was cutting a tomato when the first person spotted Babylon heading our way. I didn’t think much of it because we were parked near the beach, away from the road and therefore I thought no one could really see us. The police car, however, turned off the road and headed straight for us.

The officer parked the car behind the van and trained a bright light on us. Nothing happened for the next minute and we assumed that the officer was running the plates. Finally, an officer exited his vehicle and came to the driver’s window where I was sitting with a tomato sandwich and a knife in my hand.

When the officer approached, he asked me through the open window, “What are you doing?” In my least threatening and most reassuring voice, I replied, “I am making a sandwich.” The officer then asked if I had a license and registration to which I replied, “As a matter of fact, I don’t. They were recently stolen” (a week before at the Haile Selassie I Festival). The officer then asked me if I would step outside the van, joking that I should first put down the knife I was using to cut the tomato. I told the officer, “sure,” put down the knife and opened the door to exit.

I was then asked to place my hands up against the van. Knowing the routine, I declared that I was not carrying any weapons as I placed my hands on the van and spread my legs. It was then that I noticed another officer to my right.

Once I had my hands n the van, the officer to the left started asking questions and I tried to explain the situation to him - that we didn’t want any trouble and that we were just looking for a place where the youths would be safe and we could rest. The officer on my left became agitated at my plea and he asked a question that provoked me to turn and face him like a man to give my answer. When I turned, my right hand slowly came off the van and the officer ordered me to put my hands back on the car. Righ after he gave that command, he asked me something like, “Did I want to go to jail?” I could not hide my natural contempt at such a question, so I turned to my left, and frowning, said, “Of course not!” The next thing I know, the officer to my left was fast approaching with cuffs and the officer to my right had already smashed me up against the van and was using the full force of his body to pin me against the van.

I started pleading, “I’m not resisting arrest, I’m not resisting arrest! We haven’t done anything!” (Note: I was not charged with resisting arrest). I wasn’t resisting arrest, however I was resisting being handcuffed. Never once did the officer say that I was under arrest or declare what it was I was being arrested for. I was violated since the officers used force without ever declaring that I was under arrest….. Thus, I refused to let them put handcuffs on me since I wasn’t notified that I was under arrest (which didn’t happen until after I was booked).

With both officers upon me, we fell to the ground where I continued shouting, “I am a man! I am a man! I can stand up and answer your questions! Let me up! I have no weapons and I’m not resisting arrest!” My cries fell on deaf ears and the officers struggling to cuff me began employing holds and pressure in strategic locations on my arms and hands in an effort to subdue me.

During this scuffle on the ground, the officer on my left stood about 5 to 8 feet from the driver’s side of the van and drew his gun with both hands, aiming it straight at the van. I shouted out, “Officer! put the gun away. There are women and children in the van. Please put the gun away before someone gets hurt. Think about your own family and your career. Put the gun away. Nobody has to get hurt!” I will never forget the officer’s response. Hands slightly shaking, the officer stated, “I don’t give a fuck about your women and children!”

By the grace of JAH RASTAFARI, no one got hurt except fro me (dislocated clavicle and upper ribs, sore thumb). I was eventually cuffed and placed in a squad car where I remained silent and watched what was happening. Never once was I given the chance to simply leave the park, which I would have been more than willing to do.

While I was inside the car, more and more police arrived on the scene. A black officer who appeared to be the highest ranking officer at the scene asked me what was going on and I said, “Nothing officer. We were tired and hungry and we just wanted to find a secluded place where we could rest and where we could look at the yellow waning moon.”

I could see the officers questioning Ras Iyah, but I could not see Nehemia, her youths, or Ella. Somehow the officers searched the van and found the two bushels of leaf herb that I had been drying. One of the original officers came over to the squad car and asked me what was in the basket and I replied that it was “green herb that bears seed of its kind written about in the first book of the Bible.” The officer then began to mock me, saying, “Hey! He says its the first herb written in the Bible, whatever that is!” I said nothing and he left me in the car and went over to the van where the other officers and Ras Iyah were standing.

After some time, Ras Iyah, Nehemia, the youths and Ella were put into a squad car, another officer got into the van and I was taken to District 004 station and processed.

Friday morning I made the “run” — with much dramatics, I was driven first to 11th and State and then next to 26th and California. I was informed that we had arrived too late and that I would have to wait until the next day to see the judge. When I did see the judge (via television monitors) the public defender read my case, noting that I was a graduate from Yale University. When the public defender next read that I was charged with possession of 839 grams of marijuana, the judge said, “hold up!” and asked me what was going on. I replied that I am a Rastafarian and that the herb that was confiscated was leaf used for industrial purposes. The judge then released me on my own recognizance (I-bond). My first court date was scheduled for September 29, 1999 (a hearing to determine probable cause).

III. Search, Seizure and Forfeiture of Property

While I was handcuffed and inside the squad car, police officers searched the van and seized it and everything in it, including 839 grams of leaf herb in two bushel baskets, $1800 in cash ($1500 of which was the Shashemane Fund), two drums, four rugs, clothes (some of which was handmade, one-of-a-kind), camping and cooking equipment, cassette tapes, research materials, personal identification, a wetsuit ($200), books, blankets and tools, all of which falls under the purview of section 550/12 (a)(1-5).

Section 550/12(b) states that,

Property subject to forfeiture under this Act may be seized by the Director or any peace officer upon process or seizure warrant issued by any court having jurisdiction over the property. Seizure by the Director or any peace officer without process may be made: (2) if there is probable cause to believe that the property is subject to forfeiture under this Act and the property is directly or indirectly dangerous to health or safety; (3) if there is probable cause to believe that the property is subject to forfeiture under this Act and the property is seized under circumstances in which a warrant-less seizure or arrest would be reasonable; or (4) in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963.

Section 550/12(c) states that,

In the event of seizure pursuant to subsection (b), forfeiture proceedings shall be instituted in accordance with the Drug Asset Forfeiture Procedure Act.

IV. The Probable Cause Issue

The whole case, and therefore the return of the seized property, hinges first on the probable cause issue. If it is demonstrated that police officers erred in searching the van and seizing property because there was no probable cause, then the possession charge (550/4) disappears and I’m left with only the three lesser charges of parking on city property, failure to produce a valid drivers license and insurance. This combines what I call the “threshold “ defense and the “seed of bad fruit” defense.

Probable cause functions as a key which allows police to enter into one’s property. The moment a police enters your house or begins searching your vehicle, that officer crosses a threshold. Without probable cause, the officer can only cross that threshold illegally. Crossing the threshold illegally provides defendant the “seed of bad fruit” defense which states that because the officer’s action is illegal (foul or bad fruit) then everything that follows from that illegal action is also illegal (foul or the seeds from bad fruit) and therefore inadmissible. Thus, although police did seize two bushels of herb leaf, I contend that it can not be used as evidence for a possession charge because it was obtained without probable cause, illegally and therefore not by the due process of law.

The above is substantiated in People v. Kelly which states that “Defendant’s alleged consent for police officer to search his car was inextricably joined with prior illegal search conducted at officer’s command and such alleged consent, being itself fruit of illegal assertion of authority, could not justify further illegal search winch resulted in discovery of marijuana in defendant’s glove compartment; defendant’s 'consent’ was passive submission to authority and not voluntary relinquishment or waiver of defendant’s constitutional rights.” (People v. Kelly, 1979, 31 Ill. Dec. 537, 76 Ill. App. 3d 80, 394 N.E. 2d 739.)

Several cases set out the kind of multiplicity of inputs (circumstances) which must obtain in order to establish probable cause in these type of cases. In People v. Lang, the court ruled that “At the time that law enforcement officer directed defendant to stop his automobile, officer could not have reasonably inferred from circumstances that defendant was committing or was about to commit or had committed offense and thus stop and seizure of defendant and vehicle were illegal and cannabis plants in defendant’s vehicle were discovered incident to illegal stop.” (People v. Lang, 1978, 23 Ill. Dec 15, 66 Ill. App. 3d 920, 383 N.E. 2d 782). In other words, a mere traffic violation such as parking on city property, is not enough to establish probable cause that a felony is, was, or will be committed.

In People v. Witanowski, the court ruled that “Warrant-less search of defendants’ automobile on highway and seizure of bag of cannabis was reasonable either because defendant’s bizarre and unusually dangerous behavior prior to his arrest , his repeated attempts to flee and his resisting arrest could reasonably have raised a legitimate suspicion that more was involved than a traffic violation, so that the search was reasonable as an attempt to secure an explanation for defendant’s behavior, to preserve evidence or as an attempt to locate weapons and thereby protect the public, or because the evidence was discovered in plan view when officer entered automobile to remove it from highway.” (People v. Witanowski, 1982, 60 Ill. Dec. 537, 104 Ill. App. 3d 918, 433 N.E. 2d 334)

In People v. Erb the court stated that “Mobility of automobile, fact that occupants had been alerted and danger that evidence might never be found again if warrant had to be obtained supported reasonableness of search of automobile after apparent traffic violation and detection of odor of marijuana, and smell of marijuana emanating from automobile and person of defendant who stood alongside automobile afforded officer sufficient probable cause to believe crime had just been or was being committed and to search defendant and second defendant’s suspicious movements and finding of packet of marijuana near her gave probable cause for her detention and search.” (People v. Erb, 1970, 128 Ill. App. 2d 126, 261 N.E. 2d 431.

In People v. Boyd, the court ruled that “Where officer observed defendant emptying marijuana from small wooden box as he approached car that he had stopped for traffic violation and, upon asking for defendant’s identification, officer viewed passenger begin to exit defendants’s car while placing clear plastic bag of same substance in his coat pocket, and, as officer placed passenger under arrest, defendant immediately picked up cardboard box and locked it inside trunk, police officer had probable cause to search defendant’s automobile trunk without a warrant.” (People v. Boyd, 1980, 41 Ill. Dec. 484, 86 Ill. App. 3d 73, 407 N.E. 2d 982).

Thus we can see the exigent circumstances necessary to establish probable cause. MY CASE HAS NO SUCH EXTRA CIRCUMSTANCES. There is nothing gin the three lesser charges (parking on city property, failure to show valid drivers license and failure to show proof of insurance) which, in and of themselves, singly or combined, reasonably gives probable cause that a felony was, is , or is about to be committed. There was no bizarre or dangerous behavior exhibited, no attempt to flee or resist arrest, no evidence discovered in plain view, no detection of odor or smell emanating from the vehicle, nor was nay herb found in or around the defendant or in plain sight in or around defendant’s vehicle.

Even though it might be contended that failure to show a valid driver’s license transforms the situation into more than just a mere traffic violation, unlike People v. Huth, in which the court found that “Where vehicle was curbed as a result of the commission of a traffic violation, where driver was unable to produce a valid driver’s license, and where a check by arresting officer revealed that the driver had no proper license, the circumstances warranted officer’s reasonable belief that he was dealing with a criminal, not a mere traffic violator, and warranted a search of driver and passengers. . . . and the subsequent seizure of marijuana observed in plain view under passenger side of front sear did not violate defendant’s constitutional rights,” in my case a check by the arresting officer did reveal that I had a proper license and therefore should not have aroused suspicion that I was a criminal, and should not have moved the situation outside the purview of a routine traffic stop, and should not have afforded the office probable cause to cross over the threshold.

V. Due Process of Law and International Law

Because most black defendants are ignorant of their legal rights, how to defend them, or what to do once they have a case, the United States of America is able to use the due process of law to steal, kidnap, rob, rape, murder and commit genocide against them. Consider that the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution reads:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges of or immunities of citizens of the United States; NOR SHALL ANY STATE DEPRIVE ANY PERSON OF LIFE, LIBERTY, OR PROPERTY WITHOUT THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Hence,, the 14th Amendment reads, in part, that it is perfectly lawful for states to take a person’s life, enslave them, and/or take their personal property so long as they follow the procedures contained in a “book” which they wrote and known as federal, state, and local statutes, codes and law. the execution of such action is known as “due process of law.”

Salvation for black people, therefore, is found outside of the jurisdiction of the United States because America can proceed through the due process of law with all the advantages they wrote in it. This is why the knowledge and exercise of international law is such an important path toward real liberation from our colonial, lesser-man condition. In my opinion, this is precisely what Malcolm X began to teach before he was illegally and criminally assassinated (as opposed to legally executed).

Nearly two decades later, I recalled the attack by the Chicago police in From Yale To Rastafari: Letter to My Mom, 1995-1998,

“On August 6, 1999 I was arrested by the Chicago Police Department on possession of more than 500g of cannabis. On that night I received a call that a member of the Rastafarian community needed help immediately. She needed to move out of her apartment with her children and her belongings. I had a fifteen-passenger van capable of moving her, so I was the one who was called.

With my friend Ras Iyah, we went to get the woman and her children, loaded up my van, and drove off. The only problem was that she had nowhere to go. Because it was still very hot at the end of the summer, and because I was still suffering severely from my allergies, I drove to the beach on Lake Michigan to catch the breeze coming off the lake, to cool down and breathe a little better while we figured out what to do and where to take her.

Sitting in the van parked at the beach, we began making sandwiches. I was cutting a tomato in the front seat when we were all startled by bright lights shining right in my face. A police officer shouted at me. I rolled down the window and the angry officer said, “What are you doing?”

“I’m making a sandwich,” I said.

“Get out of the car!” he demanded. I slowly put down the knife opened the door and stepped out. Immediately the cop slammed me against the van. My natural instinct was to defend myself. I had just been attacked and my natural instinct for self defense kicked in automatically.

The officer and I ended up on the ground. Several officers came to his defense. I did not know what was happening inside the van. Eventually I was pinned to the ground my hands held behind my back and an officer’s knee on my neck.

What happened next was the scariest moment of my life even to this day. As in slow motion, I watched the officer pull his gun and point it straight into the van. I yelled, “Don’t shoot! There’s women and children in the van!”

The words that came out of the officer’s mouth were pure evil. “I don’t give a fuck about your women and children!”

I survived that night. We all survived, but I landed in jail. When they searched the vehicle, they found several bushel baskets filled with leaves from plants that I had just harvested. The officers didn’t know what it was.

“What’s this?” they asked.

“Leaves,” I responded.

“What kind of leaves?” they asked.

“Leaves from a green herb that bears seed of its kind.” I literally quoted him the verse Genesis 1:29. Because the officers were not used to seeing cannabis in its natural form, they didn’t recognize it. So, they confiscated it and at the station determined that I had over 500 grams. That was a felony. Like millions of other people, mostly young black men, I had now got caught in America’s drug war.

But the story took an unexpected turn. I was given a court date. However, my religious convictions centered on the fact that no earthly authority had the right to deny me the very gift that God gave to man. The Hebrew version of Genesis 1:29 says, “God said, ‘See, I give you every seed-bearing plant that is upon all the earth, and every tree that has seed-bearing fruit; they shall be yours for food.’” This was my entire defense.

If the Chicago Police Department were going to persecute me, they were going to have to defy God.

Of course, my family was not happy about this at all. But it was a matter of principle to me. My religious faith, based at that time, on the Bible, said that I was to withstand persecution for my faith. I had said I wanted to live a spiritual life like Jesus, and here I was, wearing dreadlocks, the Nazarite vow, quoting scripture to the authorities, just like Jesus. I had asked for this.

To the dismay of my family, I insisted on representing myself. Having been schooled by MOVE members in this kind of thing, I neither trusted public defenders nor desired one. I wanted my day in court. To me, this was the purpose of faith – to make one ready to stand up and do the right thing regardless of the consequences, regardless of the threat of fines or imprisonment or even death. I was not seeking to be any kind of martyr, but I also wasn’t seeking to be a coward or to acquiesce to an unjust system. I truly believed that one man with God on his side could win any battle.

This was not the first time I had gone into court to do battle. Once, while visiting my mother, I wanted to play my drum and sing praises to Jah Rastafari. That’s what Rastas do. All the time. Day and night. Since it was already late at night and my mother and her husband had gone to bed, I didn’t want to wake them. I decided to go to the local park where I wouldn’t disturb anyone.

The gate to the park was open so I drove the car into the parking lot and sat there, playing my drum and chanting my praises to God.

Sure enough, it wasn’t long before a police officer came. He said the park was closed, but I said that the gate was open. He said, “do you see the sign that says the park is closed at 11:00 pm?” I said, “No. I did not see that sign. It is not posted at the entrance and as you can see, I’m parked here and the sign is all the way over there. I didn’t see it.” Apparently, that was too smart an answer, so I was quickly arrested for trespassing.

Before my trial for trespassing, I had a dream. I was standing in the courtroom wearing a long white shirt that had the red, gold and green colors of the Ethiopian flag as trim around the neck and cuffs. I told my mom that we had to make that shirt so that I could wear it during my trial. I would not take no for an answer and so my mother and I went to the fabric store and bought the material and together I made my first article of clothing.

On the day of the trial I appeared in court, with my homemade white shirt. I’m quite sure that my appearance was, for lack of a better word, strange.

When my case was called, the judge asked me if my lawyer was here. I told him that I did need a lawyer and that I was representing myself. Of course, the judge advised me against doing this, but I told him it was my right.

He then asked me, “Do you have your voir dire instructions?”

“No,” I said. “What are voir dire instructions?”

The judge became a little annoyed and tried to convince me that I should get a lawyer, but I refused. I told him I am Yale educated, so I ought to be able to coherently make my case and have my day in court. The judge told me that there is a law library in the basement and that I had two hours to come back with my voir dire instructions otherwise he was going to appoint a public defender to handle my case.

Having studied philosophy, I was used to reading, comprehending, conceptualizing, and writing. I went down to the law library and told the librarian that I had two hours to write voir dire instructions and that I needed her help. She got me the relevant books and I went to work.

Two hours later, back in court, the Judge asked me, “Do you have your voir dire instructions?”

“Yes, your Honor,” I replied. The judge was shocked when I handed them to him, neatly typed, following the format I mimicked from the books. He had no choice but to proceed.

I went through the entire process of voir dire and opening remarks. I took the stand in my defense and then I cross examined the arresting officer. I then made closing remarks. Though the jury still found me guilty, the judge made it a point to put it in the record that I had earned his respect and that he would consider me a friend of the court and I was welcomed to see him anytime.  Having this under my belt, I was not afraid to go to trial for my cannabis charges.

This time, when I was called to the stand to testify, my hand on the Bible, I was asked, “Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God?” I replied,

“Only if you swear to judge this case in accordance with what it says in this Bible I am swearing on.”

At that moment, it was as if lightning struck and the record had skipped. This was not normal, and my answer threw a monkey wrench into their proceedings. The judge promptly cleared the court and went into his chambers.

While they court tried to figure out what to do, I was ready. I had prepared my opening statements ahead of time:

My Defense

This is no longer about me. What do I care if I win or lose this case? Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, you will see that the future of my generation, especially those we with black faces like me, is nothing.

We are already imprisoned on death row, “some in maximum, the rest in minimum,” as Mumia Abu-Jamal states. The fullness and freedom of life have already been sucked out of most of us. We have no future as long as our hope rests on the policies of the U.S. which have made us last in every major index of health and quality of life, and first in every misfortune. We have no future as long as our hope rests on the pipe dreams of the NBA, the Ivy-League, or Hollywood. We have no future as long as any success means the loss of soul and self-government. What shall it profit a man to gain the riches of the world only so that he must spend it on air filters so one’s children don’t choke on the exhaust of the industrial devilution?; What shall it profit a man to gain the riches of the world only so that he must spend it on air filters, water purifiers, medicine and a first-class space shuttle ticket off this dying Earth? What hope is there that if I succeed, I must spend it all on Security to ward off and beat down my neighbors and the world’s millions upon whose backs were built everything the Elite Few now enjoy? No! what future is there when there is no land to escape to which has not been stained by the blood of so many innocent people? Visit Africa and see a continent full of artificially and technologically mutilated leper colonies. Yeah, in Zaire, Sudan, the Congo are armless and legless humans. Their soccer leagues now have a crippled-only division.

No, this is no longer about me. You can do nothing to me. Imprisonment, death – we are already living that reality, despite the efforts of some to escape it and act as though things are getting better. The only freedom they offer is the freedom to become a freak, a predator, or the living dead.

This case is now my attempt to SAVE THE WORLD. To shout loudly, speak eloquently, present thoroughly my last God-inspired appeal for TRUTH, RIGHT and JUSTICE.

So how does a good, bright, gifted Black kid with a million-dollar education like me end up here? Having been tricked through a process of constructive fraud by Yale University, I was coerced to re-examine my entire life and values. This in turn provoked a leap of faith and by the Grace of God, Almighty JAH RASTAFARI, I landed on the other side of overstanding, on the new heaven and Earth where God’s Supreme Spirit and Wisdom is inscribed in my heart and where righteous self-government rules. It should not surprise you, then, that the dimensions of this struggle are principally spiritual. To best understand this case, ask yourself this question: does the State know better how to live your life than you do? Or better yet, does the state have the authority to take away my God-given rights and gifts? As I perceive it, this case is really about my decision to accept Jah Rastafari as my King and Lord, just like Christians accept Christ. It is my internationally protected human right to do so.

His Majesty implores us to read the Bible with sincerity, with a clean conscious, and the TRUTH, which is the word of God, shall be opened and revealed. In doing so, I found that God gave us every green herb bearing seed of its kind for food and medicine. Cast in this light, the State is attempting to deny me that which God expressly gave each of us – green herb bearing seed of its kind.

Thus, the State is trying to kill me through starvation, deprivation of medicine, and forcing me to abandon my religious faith.

This is consistent with all kinds of cruel U.S. policy since the murder, genocide, and ethnocide of the Native peoples of this land and the Africans they enslaved and brought here, as well as people of foreign lands who are the fodder for finance monopoly capitalism.

President Clinton has asked us to have a national dialogue on race. Well, everyone knows that the U.S. starves people and enforces blockades and embargoes, including medical ones, all over the world, so it should not surprise you that it is happening right here in America. Though its primary targets are racial minorities, paraplegics like Jim Montgomery, grandmothers, kids – no one is spared, least of all the least of this society – poor, non-white (Black) youth who have, since the time of slavery, always been the human fodder to feed this system. Our bodies were forced to build America, clean America, and entertain America.

Today, we are forced to die slowly for America. Once a person internalizes this and then learns the TRUTH about cannabis, is it any wonder that we are here today? Given the choice to die slowly or live fully, contributing to saving the planet by growing cannabis, any right thinking, reborn, emancipated slave would choose freedom and cannabis every time. Only the ignorant, the timid, and the sellout would do otherwise!

My name, like my father’s and grandfather’s is NATHANIEL which means gift from God. I am the firstborn son in the month of April, the first month according to the Zodiac. I am also among the group of people in the last 70 years to receive the Revelation of His Majesty. Like Christ and the Buddha, I have walked this Earth with nothing. My dreadlocks are consecrated to freedom and are a visible sign of a special relationship with God in the same tradition as the biblical Nazarites.

Having beheld Haile Selassie I, the power and might of the Trinity, I have lived under the Overwhelming grace of the Most High. This trial, then, represents the States persecution of the first and last fruit of God’s chosen people. The State is thus in advance doomed to failure because one man with God is more powerful than any army on Earth.

Ladies and Gentleman of the jury, I am not on trial, YOU ARE. You are being tested to see if you can overcome intimidation, overcome propaganda, and overcome the ignorance and fear which has been ingrained in you without your permission. You are being tested to see whether or not you can still recognize RIGHT, and courageously stand up for real JUSTICE by dismissing an unjust law and unjust persecution. You are being tested to decide whether or not ILLEGAL means WRONG. You must decide what is RIGHT. I remind all of you that slavery was once legal, but we all know that that did not make it RIGHT!

The decision you make can either radically break with the death dealing status quo of the system or acquiesce to the system. You must choose Revolution in this very courtroom. If you don’t your kid, or your mother or your grandmother will be next. Even you.

Outside the court, I was approached by the prosecuting attorney.  I told him, “Look. If you proceed with this trial, I am going to reveal where I got the cannabis. I will describe, in detail, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ secret cannabis field from which I harvested the plants.” Within an hour I was told that they would give me probation and that my record would be expunged.  I accepted the deal, feeling that I had battled the courts to a stalemate However, I had now been officially persecuted for practicing my religion in the United States. It was this experience which lead me to organize the worldwide Rastafari community and seek justice. That effort would cause me to travel on four continents, negotiate with African Heads of State, and to lead a millennial, “back-to-Africa” movement at the start of the 21st Century.  For that story, you can read the five volumes of Come Out of Her My People! 21st Century Black Prophetic Faith and Pan African Diplomacy.

Come OUt of Her Volumes.JPG

One of the reasons I feel I can tell the story now is because on May 31, 2019, the Illinois House of Representatives passed House Bill 1438 by a 66-47 vote. The bill includes expungement provisions for those arrested for marijuana possession prior to decriminalization.

“The most historic aspect of this is not just that it legalizes cannabis for adults but rather the extraordinary efforts it takes to reduce the harm caused by the failed war on marijuana and the communities it hurt the most,” state Sen. Toi Hutchinson, D-Olympia Fields, said during a Senate floor debate, according to the Chicago Sun-Times.

Thus, the state of Illinois is now admitting that they were wrong and that I was right. It is a victory, nineteen years delayed, but a victory, nonetheless.

Arrest Record.JPG
cannabis conviction.jpg
Crime Bill Funding.JPG
Drug stats 2.JPG
Drug stats 4.JPG
Drug stats 3.JPG
Drug stats 5.JPG
Drug stats1.JPG
Faces of the Drug War 1.JPG
Faces of the Drug War 2.JPG
More black men enslaved.JPG

The War on Drugs was not a response to a national threat of drug use among Black people in ghettos. America launched the Drug War because the Reagan Administration wanted a war. The public justifications for the invasion of black communities were nothing but pretexts, and falsified pretexts at that. The notion that most illegal drug use and sales happens in the ghetto is pure fiction.

Michelle Alexander writes in her book The New Jim Crow that

“In fact, the National Institute on Drug Abuse reported in 2000 that white students use cocaine at eight times the rate of black students and use heroin at seven times the rate of black students. That same survey revealed that nearly identical percentages of white and black high school seniors use marijuana. The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse reported in 2000 that white youth aged 12-17 are more than a third more likely to have sold illegal drugs than African American youth. Thus, the very same year Human Rights Watch was reporting that African Americans were being arrested and imprisoned at unprecedented rates, government data revealed that black were no more likely to be guilty of drug crimes than whites and that white youth were actually the most likely of any racial or ethnic group to be guilty of illegal drug possession and sales. Any notion that drug use among blacks is more severe or dangerous is belied by the data; white youth have about three times the number of drug-related emergency room visits as their African American counterparts.

The notion that whites comprise the vast majority of drug users and dealers – and may well be more likely than other racial groups to commit drug crimes – may seem implausible to some, given the media imagery we are fed on a daily basis and the racial composition of our prisons and jails. Upon reflection, however, the prevalence of white drug crime - including drug dealing - should not be surprising. After all, where do whites get their illegal drugs? Do they all drive to the ghetto to purchase them from somebody standing on a street corner? No. Studies consistently indicate that drug markets, like American society generally, reflect our nation’s racial and socioeconomic boundaries. Whites tend to sell to whites; black to blacks. University students tend to sell to each other. Rural whites, for their part, don’t make a special trip to the ‘hood to purchase marijuana. They buy it from somebody down the road. White high school students typically buy drugs from white classmates, friends, or older relatives. Even Barry McCaffrey, former director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, once remarked, if your child bought drugs, “it was from a student of their own race generally”. The notion that most illegal drug use and sales happens in the ghetto is pure fiction. Drug trafficking occurs there, but it occurs everywhere else in America as well. Nevertheless, black men have been admitted to state prison on drug charges at a rate that is more than thirteen times higher than white men. For young black men, the statistics are even worse. One in 9 black men between the ages of twenty and thirty-five was behind bars in 2006, and far more were under some form of penal control- such as probation or parole. . . . Human Rights Watch reported in 2000 that, in seven states, African Americans constitute 80 to 90 percent of all drug offenders sent to prison. In at least fifteen states, blacks are admitted to prison on drug charges at a rate from twenty to fifty-seven times greater than that of white men. . . . Although the majority of illegal users and dealers nationwide are white, three-fourths of all people imprisoned for drug offenses have been black or Latino. . . .

THESE GROSS RACIAL DISPARITIES SIMPLY CANNOT BE EXPLAINED BY RATES OF ILLEGAL DRUG ACTIVITY AMONG AFRICAN AMERICANS.

What, then, does explain the extraordinary racial disparities in our criminal justice system? Old-fashioned racism seems out of the question. . . .

The idea that the criminal justice system discriminates in such a terrific fashion when few people openly express or endorse racial discrimination may seem far-fetched, if not absurd. How could the War on Drugs operate in a discriminatory manner, on such a large scale, when hardly anyone advocates or engages in explicit race discrimination? . . .

This sort of claim invites skepticism. Nonracial explanations and excuses for the systemic mass incarceration of people of color are plentiful. It is the genius of the new system of control that it can always be defended on nonracial grounds, given the rarity of a noose or a racial slur in connection with any particular criminal case. . . . What is painfully obvious when one steps back from individual cases and specific policies is that the system of mass incarceration operates with stunning efficiency to sweep people of color off the streets, lock them in cages, and then release them into an inferior second-class status. Nowhere is this more true than in the War on Drugs.

The central question, then, is HOW exactly does a formally colorblind criminal justice system achieve such racially discriminatory results? Rather easily, it turns out. The process occurs in two stages. The first step is to grant law enforcement officials extraordinary discretion regarding whom to stop, search, arrest, and charge for drug offenses [Siphiwe Note: because previously you couldn’t do that, you had to have probable cause], thus ensuring that conscious and unconscious racial beliefs and stereotypes will be given free rein. Unbridled discretion inevitably creates huge racial disparities. Then, the damning step: Close the courthouse doors to all claims by defendants and private litigants that the criminal justice system operates in racially discriminatory fashion. Demand that anyone who wants to challenge racial bias in the system offer, in advance, clear proof that the racial disparities are the product of intentional racial discrimination – i.e., the work of a bigot. This evidence will almost never be available in the era of colorblindness, because everyone knows – but does not say – that the enemy in the War on Drugs can be identified by race. This simple design has helped to produce one of the most extraordinary systems of racialized social control the world has ever seen.”

American imprisons more of its ethnic minorities than any country in the world including China, Myanmar, Russia and South Africa during apartheid.

THERE ARE MORE BLACK SLAVES IN AMERICA RIGHT NOW THAN THERE WERE IN 1850 BEFORE THE START OF THE CIVIL WAR.

That's according to Michelle Alexander, author of the book The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness.

That's not some overblown rhetoric. Remember, the 13th Amendment says, “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, EXCEPT AS A PUNISHMENT FOR CRIME whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”

The 13th Amendment makes slavery legal. The so-called War on Drugs was the United States Government approved action that re-instituted slavery among predominantly black communities. Alexander writes,

"An extraordinary percentage of black men in the United States are legally barred from voting today, just as they have been throughout most of American history. They are also subject to legalized discrimination in employment, housing, education, public benefits, and jury service, just as their parents, grandparents, and great grandparents once were. What has changed since the collapse of Jim Crow has less to do with the basic structure of our society than with the language we use to justify it. In the era of colorblindness, it is no longer socially permissible to use race, explicitly, as a justification for discrimination, exclusion, and social contempt. So we don't. Rather than rely on race, we use our criminal justice system to label people of color "criminals" and then engage in all the practices we supposedly left behind. Today it is perfectly legal to discriminate against criminals in nearly all the ways that it was once legal to discriminate against African Americans."

In 1973, the National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals recommended that "no new institutions for adults should be built and existing institutions for juveniles should be closed." This recommendation was based on their finding that "the prison, the reformatory, and the jail have achieved only a shocking record of failure. There is overwhelming evidence that these institutions create crime rather than prevent it." Nevertheless, in less than thirty years, the U.S. penal population exploded from around 300,000 to more than 2 million with nonviolent drug convictions accounting for the majority of the increase, and black people accounting for the majority of those convictions.

Between 1980 and 1984, FBI anti-drug funding increased from $8 million to $95 million. Department of Defense anti-drug allocations increased from $33 million in 1981 to $1,042 million in 1991. During that same period, DEA anti-drug spending grew from $86 to $1,026 million and FBI anti-drug allocations grew from $8 to $181 million. This is how the white supremacists used YOUR tax dollars to establish the new system of legalized slavery.

By contrast, the budget of the National Institute on Drug Abuse was reduced from $274 million to $57 million from 1981 to 1984 and anti-drug funds allocated to the Department of Education were cut from $14 million to $3 million.

Between 1988 and October 1989, the Washington Post alone ran 1,565 stores about the "drug scourge". This is an example of how the white supremacists used THE MEDIA to justify the War on Drugs.

In September 1986, the House of Representatives passed legislation that allocated $2 billion to the anti-drug crusade and shortly thereafter, the president signed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 that included mandatory minimum sentencing. Once elected, President Clinton endorsed the "three strikes and you are out" law and passed the $30 billion crime bill which authorized $16 billion for new prisons. During Clinton's tenure, the white supremacists slashed funding for public housing by $17 billion (a reduction of 61%) and boosted corrections by $19 billion (an increase of 171%), "effectively making the construction of prisons the nation's main housing program for the urban poor".

Drug offenses alone account for two thirds of the rise in the federal inmate population and more than half of the state prisoners. Approximately half a million people are in prison or jail for a drug offense today, compared to an estimated 41,100 in 1980 - an increase of 1,100 percent.

By 2005, four of five drug arrests were for possession. By the end of 2007, more than 7 million Americans - or one in every 31 adults - were behind bars, on probation or on parole. 31 million people have been arrested since the drug war began. There were more than 1.5 million drug arrests in the U.S. in 2016. The vast majority – more than 80% – were for possession only. Nearly 80% of people in federal prison and almost 60% of people in state prison for drug offenses are black or Latino. One in nine black children has an incarcerated parent, compared to one in 57 white children.

One in 13 black people of voting age are denied the right to vote because of laws that disenfranchise people with felony convictions.

According to Michelle Alexander, "There is no doubt that if young white people were incarcerated at the same rates as young black people, the issue would be a national emergency"

Now consider how the opiod crises, affecting white people, is not considered part of the War on Drugs, but is treated as a health epidemic requiring government funds for prevention and treatment. The Opiod Crisis Response Act of 2018 will authorize a total of $7.9 billion from federal funds for health agencies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, according to an estimate by the Congressional Budget Office because the use of drugs like heroin is now treated as a national public health emergency.

Michelle Alexander argues that "we have not ended racial caste [and slavery] in America; we have merely redesigned it.". The US Criminal justice system functions as a contemporary system of racial control, relegating millions to slavery even as the system formally adheres to the principle of colorblindness.

James Baldwin wrote, "It is this failure to care, really care, across color lines, that lies at the core of this system of control and every racial caste system that has existed in the United States or anywhere else in the world."

Share

A BALANTA PANTHER: STEPHEN HOBBS AND THE CHICAGO BLACK PANTHER PARTY

Binham B’rassa (Balanta People) in America. Balanta Black Panther Stephen Hobbs and his nephew Joshua Roberts.

Binham B’rassa (Balanta People) in America. Balanta Black Panther Stephen Hobbs and his nephew Joshua Roberts.

Amilcar Cabral and Balanta soldiers in the PAIGC, Guinea Bissau

Amilcar Cabral and Balanta soldiers in the PAIGC, Guinea Bissau

Binham B’rassa (Balanta people) played a significant role in the global Black liberation struggle in the 1960’s and early 1970’s. While Balanta people formed The African Party for the Independence of Guinea and Cape Verde (PAIGC) and initiated an eleven-year armed struggle against the Portuguese, in the United States, Balanta people were also in the forefront of the liberation struggle in America.

Balanta woman Ella Baker was a chief strategist of the civil rights and human rights movement, helping Martin Luther King organize the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) in 1957 and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) in 1960. Another Balanta family, the Blake family, was prominent in organizing the liberation movement in the 1960’s before and after the 1967 insurrection in Newark, NJ while also being prepared to confront inequality through a form of activism pioneered at Fisk University, in Nashville, TN.

One wing of the movement was composed of students in and out of SNCC who were more oriented to the ideas of Malcolm X and the self-defense philosophy of Robert Williams. Its center was the Afro-American Student Movement (ASM) at Fisk University in Nashville, Tennessee. These students wanted to introduce into the southern Civil Rights movement an explicit self-defense component coupled with a politics of Black empowerment based on nationalist values. At the urging of leaders of the National Liberation Front (the immediate precursor of RAM) student nationalists convened the first Afro-American Student Conference on Black Nationalism at Fisk University from May 1 to 4, 1964. The conference stated that Black radicals were the vanguard of revolution in this country, supported Malcolm X’s efforts to take the case of Afro-Americans to the United Nations, called for a Black cultural revolution, and discussed Pan-Africanism. The conferences 13 Points for Implementation included several points that reflected the Basic Aims and Objectives of the OAAU. The other wing of the movement composed students like Balanta student Jeremiah Blake, who was prepared to go directly into and confront racism in the white American society.

Still other Balantas like Stephen Hobbs, became instrumental in the Black Panther Party. Adam Sanchez and Jesse Hagopian note that,

“The Panthers didn’t develop out of thin air but evolved from their relationships with other civil rights organizations, especially the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC). The name and symbol of the Panthers were adopted from the Lowndes County Freedom Organization (LCFO), an independent political organization SNCC helped organize in Alabama, which was also called the “Black Panther Party.” Furthermore, SNCC allied with the Panthers in 1968 and although the alliance lasted only five months, it was a crucial time for the growth of the Panthers.”

According to Hobbs family genealogist Joshua Roberts:

“Born to SL. Hobbs and Bertha Hobbs, my Uncle Stephen was S.L’s first born son and the second child of Bertha. My uncle and his older brother Donald were born and raised on the west side of Chicago. He had four other siblings, his baby sister (my grandmother) being the closest. My uncle was said to be very grumpy but had a warm heart. A powerful man who never sugar-coated any information. Super smart and a master chess player, this is the story of the Balanta descendant and Black Panther Steven Hobbs.

My uncle was special and had the spirit of a thousand generations within him. A very boisterous, commanding, and authoritative man. While he was stubborn he had a he heart and was very protective of his family and especially the females. He was a father figure to many of his nephews and nieces. According to my father when he first met my uncle he thought that uncle Steven was their father until my mother and aunties made it obvious that he was there uncle.

During his teenage years uncle Stephen went to St. Mel High School. The school would eventually become Providence St. Mel today. The school merged eventually and he was able to unite with his sister. She said the girls had to go all the way to the top floor while the boys had it easier due to them being on the lower levels. During high school Stephen was on the basketball team at St. Mel and was said to be very talented but his high school career was cut short due to his revolutionary spirit. It is to be noted that his younger sister Lynette went to Providence which was an all girl school at the time. The two were extremely close during their childhood. Almost like best friends considering all things, telling her secrets that he wouldn't tell his other siblings.

Providence St Mel.JPG

 During the mid 60s the America experienced one of the most powerful movements in its history. The civil rights movement seen many future black icons stepping up into leadership positions to combat social injustices against Black people. When Stephen was about 15 or 16 decided that he wanted to run away from home so he could support the movement. Uncle Steven ran away at broad day light and only told his sister Lynette. He told her not to tell their parents on what had transpired. My great grandfather S.L didn't realize what had happened until a few days later when he realized Steven was gone. When Stephen left home he joined the Chicago Chapter Black Panther Party where he was one of their first members as he ran away prior to the official found- ng of the Chicago Chapter in 1968.

Balanta Panther Stephen Hobbs

Balanta Panther Stephen Hobbs

Fred Hampton and my uncle were good friends according to my grandmother. Hampton gave my late uncle his own office on Pulaski Rd between Van Buren and Jackson. The office was a complete wreck (debris and rubble, torn walls), however my uncle worked hard and eventually cleaned up the office very well and made it organized.

The Black Panther Party emerged on the city’s west side in the fall of 1968. As one of the 45 Black Panther chapters in the U.S, the IL chapter gained over 300 new members within 4 months.

View, from across the street, of the Black Panther Party's Illinois chapter headquarters (at 2350 West Madison Street) on the day after a police raid, Chicago, Illinois, July 30, 1969. (Photo by Chicago Sun-Times Collection/Chicago History Museum/Ge…

View, from across the street, of the Black Panther Party's Illinois chapter headquarters (at 2350 West Madison Street) on the day after a police raid, Chicago, Illinois, July 30, 1969. (Photo by Chicago Sun-Times Collection/Chicago History Museum/Getty Images)

By the middle of 1969, the Chicago Panthers ideology roots helped them form alliances with the Latino and white Chicagoans called the rainbow coalition. This coalition targeted Chicago’s structural inequalities by placing programs like the free breakfast and free legal consultation for Chicago’s disadvantaged.

Rainbow Coalition Demonstration On W Armitage Elevated view of demonstrators, gathered in a vacant lot on West Armitage Avenue, during a Rainbow Coalition rally to protest a police killing, Chicago, Illinois, May 13, 1969. The coalition, which inclu…

Rainbow Coalition Demonstration On W Armitage Elevated view of demonstrators, gathered in a vacant lot on West Armitage Avenue, during a Rainbow Coalition rally to protest a police killing, Chicago, Illinois, May 13, 1969. The coalition, which included members of the Black Panther Party, Young Patriots Organization, Cobra Stones, Students for a Democratic Society, and Young Lords Organization, among others, was protesting the murder of unarmed Young Lord Manuel Ramos. (Photo by Chicago Sun-Times Collection/Chicago History Museum/Getty Images)

Stephen was responsible for opening up the church and do the breakfast club. Grandma went sometimes to support her brother. She had to do it behind her mothers back (Bertha Hobbs). “I wasn’t an official member of the Party but I worked for the party-we sold papers (BPP) and served food”. She said the children looked so beat up and sad, realizing just how impactful the breakfast club was making on the black youth. She always went to help her brother before school.

 COINTELPRO

 

The militant image of the Panthers eventually made conservative members leave due to the alienation and negative press. Richard J Daley was afraid of the panthers due to them having more influence than city hall. Eventually the Panthers got raided on 3 separate occasions. All in 1969, to look for illegal weapons.

My uncle was one of the militant members and was a hardcore Panther. He even traveled to Michigan and Ohio for a few Panther affairs and missions. However during the late 60s, my Uncle Stephen was back in the city doing the breakfast program. While he was heading to the church something happened…

Grandma who went to go help realized that the church doors were locked. “The day was cold, it was freezing outside”. There had been police scouts spying on my uncle for sometime now. The Chicago police kidnapped my uncle and planned to assassinate him out south. However the plan didn't fall through because the cop in the passenger seat wasn't ok with it and didn't feel com- mutable, which saved him. However while out south they took all his belongings and he had to walk home all the way to the west side from the south side.

The final raid crippled the organization when Fred Hampton was targeted.

Fred Hampton 1948-1969

Uncle Fred was a good friend of my late uncle Stephen. Fred is a year older than my uncle. Chairman of the BPP of Chicago, Hampton formed an alliance with the Young Patriots and Young Lords and several gangs in Chicago. Due to this influence the U.S government and FBI saw Hampton as the most dangerous of the Panthers and was a target along side Huey Newton and other Civil Rights leaders. (Martin Luther King and Malcolm were already assassinated by time Hampton rose to power.

J Edgar Hoover used COINTELPRO to disrupt Hampton’s movement and my uncle was a direct victim of that.

December 3rd-4th 1969

My uncle Stephen Hobbs and several other panthers were suppose to be body guards for Fred and his girl friend Akua Njeri who was pregnant with Fred’s son.

On the evening of December 3, Hampton taught a political education course at a local church, which was attended by most members. Afterward, as was typical, several Panthers went to his Monroe Street apartment to spend the night, including Hampton and Deborah Johnson, Blair Anderson, James Grady, Ronald "Doc" Satchell, Harold Bell, Verlina Brewer, Louis True- lock, Brenda Harris, and Mark Clark. There they were met by O'Neal, who had prepared a late dinner, which the group ate around midnight. O'Neal had slipped the barbiturate sleep agent secobarbitol into a drink that Hampton consumed during the dinner, in order to sedate Hampton so he would not awaken during the subsequent raid. O'Neal left at this point, and, at about 1:30 a.m., December 4, Hampton fell asleep mid-sentence talking to his mother on the telephone.

The day of the raid Fred decided to send my Uncle on a last minute assignment. Stephen was at Fred’s house as a form of protection several times in 1969. “China” a female Panther and also an ally of my uncle was at the house with Fred and Mark. My Uncle Stephen told me he wanted to go to the house that night to support his friend and help secure the house. Nevertheless with Hampton’s growing power and with him being in line to becoming the head man for the Central Committee and the national spokesman of the BBP, the United States government and Chicago police decided to raid Hampton’s home that same night my uncle wasn't at the house. There was a massive shootout at Hampton’s home and killed Fred Hampton at point blank and Mark Clark.

Everyone else was wounded including Akua.

At 4:00 a.m., the heavily armed police team arrived at the site, divided into two teams, eight for the front of the building and six for the rear. At 4:45 a.m., they stormed into the apartment. Mark Clark, sitting in the front room of the apartment with a shotgun in his lap, was on security duty. The police shot him in the chest, killing him instantly. An alternative account said that Clark answered the door and police immediately shot him. Either way, Clark's gun discharged once into the ceiling. This single round was fired when he suffered a reflexive death-convulsion after being shot. This was the only shot fired by the Panthers.

Hampton, drugged by barbiturates, was sleeping on a mattress in the bedroom with his fiancée, Deborah Johnson, who was nine months pregnant with their child. She was forcibly removed from the room by the police officers while Hampton still lay unconscious in bed. Then, the raiding team fired at the head of the south bedroom. Hampton was wounded in the shoulder by the shooting.

Fellow Black Panther Harold Bell said that he heard the following exchange: "That's Fred Hampton."

"Is he dead?... Bring him out."

"He's barely alive." "He'll make it."

The injured Panthers said they heard two shots. According to Hampton's supporters, the shots were fired point blank at Hampton's head. According to Deborah Johnson, an officer then said: "He's good and dead now."

Fred Hamtpn Murdered.jpg
Share

REVISITING THE BATTLE PLAN: THE STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF NEW AFRIKA TO LIBERATE BLACK AMERICANS

Every May 25th, people of African heritage all over the world celebrate African Liberation Day, founded in 1958 when Kwame Nkrumah convened the First Conference of Independent States held in Accra, Ghana and attended by eight independent African states. The 15th of April was declared "Africa Freedom Day," to mark each year the onward progress of the liberation movement, and to symbolize the determination of the people of Africa to free themselves from foreign domination and exploitation.

Between 1958 and 1963 the nation/class struggle intensified in Africa and the world. Seventeen countries in Africa won their independence and 1960 was proclaimed the Year of Africa.

In the United States, In 1962, after a conversation with Malcolm X, Max Stanford founded the Revolutionary Action Movement (RAM), the first group in the United States to synthesize the thought of Marx, Lenin, Mao, and Malcolm X into a comprehensive theory of revolutionary black nationalism. The Black Guard was a national armed youth self-defense group run by RAM that argued for protecting the interests of Black America by fighting directly against its enemies.

On the 25th of May 1963, thirty-one African Heads of state convened a summit meeting to found the Organization of African Unity (OAU). They renamed African Freedom Day "African Liberation Day" and changed its date to May 25th. These new African nations fought armed liberation struggles against their foreign oppressors.

In 1964, Malcolm X became a RAM officer. He then traveled to Ghana and met with representatives of liberation organizations, including the African National Congress of South Africa (ANC) and the South African Pan-Africanist Congress of Azania (PAC). After returning from Ghana, Malcolm X and John Henrik Clarke formed the Organization of Afro American Unity (OAAU) on June 28th, 1964 to represent the African American liberation movement. On July 17, 1964, Malcolm X (traveling with Milton Henry) was welcomed to the second meeting of the Organisation of African Unity in Cairo as a representative of the OAAU. During this time, Malcolm X deepened his relationship with the forces of liberation in Africa while living on a boat in the Nile with all the liberation organization leaders. Said Malcolm,

“I was blessed with the opportunity to live on that boat with the leaders of the liberation movements, because I represented an Afro-American liberation movement - Afro-American freedom fighters. . . . It gave me an opportunity to study, listen and study the type of people involved in the struggle - their thinking, their objectives, their aims and their methods. It opened my eyes to many things. And I think I was able to steal a few ideas that they used, and tactics and strategy, that will be most effective in your and my freedom struggle in this country.”

In the book, From Civil Rights to Black Liberation: Malcolm X and the Organization of Afro-American Unity, William Sales, Jr. notes,

“Paralleling these discussions, and in as much secrecy, were discussions Malcolm X had with RAM through its field secretary, Muhammed Ahmed. As Ahmed remembered it, in June 1964 he and Malcolm worked out the structure of a revolutionary nationalist alternative to be set up within the Civil Rights movement. They also outlined the role of the OAAU in this alternative.

‘The OAAU was to be the broad front organization and RAM the underground Black Liberation Front of the U.S.A. Malcolm in his second trip to Africa was to try to find places for eventual political asylum and political/military training for cadres. While Malcolm was in Africa, the field chairman [Ahmed] was to go to Cuba to report the level of progress to Robert Williams. As Malcolm prepared Africa to support our struggle, ‘Rob’ [Robert F. Williams] would prepare Latin America and Asia. During this period, Malcolm began to emphasize that Afro-Americans could not achieve freedom under the capitalist system. He also described guerrilla warfare as a possible tactic to be used in the Black liberation struggle here. His slogan ‘Freedom by an means necessary’ has remained in the movement to this day.’

These discussions, in fact, reflected the impact of Malcolm’s interaction with the representatives of national liberation movements and guerrilla armies during his trip to Africa. He was very much focused on establishing an equivalent structure within the African American freedom struggle. On June 14, 1964, the Sunday edition of the Washington Star featured an interview with Malcolm X in which he announced the formation of ‘his new political group,’ the Afro-American Freedom Fighters. In this interview Malcolm X emphasized the right of Afro-Americans to defend themselves and to engage in guerrilla warfare. A change of direction was rapidly made, however. As Ahmed reported, Malcolm’s premature public posture on armed self-defense and guerrilla warfare frightened those in the nationalist camp who feared government repression. They feared giving public exposure to organizing efforts for self-determination and guerrilla warfare. Malcolm agreed, and the name of the new organization became the Organization of Afro-American Unity.

The OAAU was to be the organizational platform for Malcolm X as the international spokesperson for RAM’s revolutionary nationalism, but the nuts and bolts of creating a guerrilla organization were not to take place inside the OAAU. The OAAU was to be an above-ground united front engaged in legitimate activities to gain international recognition for the African American freedom struggle.”

Malcom X article OAU.jpg

Then, on February 21, 1965, Malcolm X was assassinated. However, the armed African American liberation struggle had already begun. Like the black people on the African continent, black people in America were struggling to establish a nation of their own.

In August of 1965, Robert F Williams, living in exile in Cuba, published an analysis on the Potential of A Minority Revolution in the USA.

On March 31, 1968, the Malcolm X Society (led by Milton Henry now called Gaidi Obadele) convened the Black Government Conference held in Detroit, Michigan. Attended by a few hundred people, the conference announced the formation of the Republic of New Afrika (RNA), which was to be composed of Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi and South Carolina. The Conference participants drafted a constitution and a declaration of independence. To fund the RNA, organizers planned to negotiate with the United States for reparations and for status under the Geneva Convention and by conducting a UN Sponsored Plebiscite for Self Determination.

This is a critical part of African American history that is little known and rarely given serious study. As a result, most people, including African Americans themselves, don’t even know that at the same time that African people were fighting and winning liberation struggles to achieve nationhood, African Americans were fighting the same liberation struggle AND LOST.

AS A RESULT, AFRICAN AMERICANS DID NOT ACHIEVE LIBERATION, FREEDOM AND NATIONHOOD.

Given the incredible unity of black people in and outside of America, as well as the international attention and support by the international community, the legitimate claim to establish a a black nation for African Americans on territory currently held by the United States government, MUST BECOME PART OF THE CONVERSATION FOR PROVIDING JUSTICE TO AFRICAN AMERICANS. IT IS AN ABSOLUTE REQUIREMENT, FOR AS WE HAVE BEEN SAYING,

NO JUSTICE, NO PEACE

Unfortunately, the legitimate voice of the Black Nationalists are not being featured in the media and there is little understanding of the black nationalist’s claims which are almost always dismissed as ridiculous by people, both black and white, who have never seriously studied it.

Therefore, below is reproduced War in America, one of the foundational documents of the Republic of New Afrika laying out in great detail the rationale and strategy for a black nation seceding from the United States of America. There has never been a more opportune time for liberating black people in America from the jurisdiction of their oppressors in the land of their captivity.

THE SOLUTION TO AMERICA’S RACE PROBLEM IS SIMPLE: RELEASE THE BLACK PEOPLE FROM UNITED STATES CONTROL. FREEDOM MEANS CONTROL. WHEN BLACK PEOPLE HAVE CONTROL, IN THE FORM OF STATEHOOD, THEN THEY WILL BE FREE. UNTIL THEN, AS CITIZENS WITHIN THE NATION THAT ENSLAVED THEM, CITIZENSHIP DOES NOT MEAN FREEDOM. IT MEANS YOUR STATUS HAS BEEN CONVERTED. BLACK PEOPLE ARE STILL CONTROLLED BY FOREIGNERS AND A GOVERNMENT THAT SPONSORS TERRORISM AND HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE BY FAILING TO PROSECUTE VIOLATORS AND MAINTAINING CONDITIONS BEST DESCRIBES AS GENOCIDAL.

Now it is time for every black person to revisit the Republic of New Afrika’s strategy for liberation as well as an analysis of what happened.

Continue reading…

RNA analysis.JPG

Introduction To Revised Edition

THE most significant achievement of the Black Revolution since the publishing of War In America in January of this year was the founding, on March 31 of this year (1968), of the Republic o f New Africa.

Nothing else, in a year already full of significant events in our struggle, called for a revision of any concept contained in War. All the other events — the assassination of the leading exponent of non-violence, even the significant turning brought about by the victory of guerrillas in Cleveland who in July outgunned oppressive police and slew three of them — all the other events fit easily into the broad pattern stroked out by the original version of War.

But the founding of the Republic o f New Africa called for revision of a basic concept: War, written a year and a half before the founding, envisioned that the Malcolmites would work within the governmental framework and state structure of the United States, winning black people, first in Mississippi, to the cause of independent land and power, follow this with election victories (the sheriffs’ offices, particularly) within the U.S. federal system, and finally, take the black state out of the U.S. federal union at the moment when white power could no longer be successfully resisted or neutralized in its efforts to prevent the creation of a new society in the black state.

The founding of the Republic obsoleted this approach — and this revision of War makes note of that obsoleteness. By declaration the nation has become a fact — though subjugated by the United States. It is no longer possible, if we are a nation as we have declared — and we are — to proceed through the framework and state structure of the United States federal union. Our job becomes not winning sheriffs' elections but, rather, simply demonstrating that our government, the Republic o f New Africa, does in fact have the consent of the people who live in the areas we claim as subjugated territory of the Republic o f New Africa. The job is that of demonstrating that we — not the government of the United States — have the consent of the people.

Why, then, since the Malcolm X Society had stated the former approach as our position, did we change direction, taking the lead in founding the Republic o f New Africa?

The answer is simple. It was to remove the Malcolmites and the other black nationalist revolutionaries in America from a position where the United States might with impunity destroy them to a position where attacks upon us by the United States become international matters, threatening world peace, and thereby within reach of the United Nations, thereby within reach of our friends in Africa and Asia who would help us. We could not entertain hope of help in our struggle from international sources so long as we conducted our struggle within the United States federal union and as if we were citizens of the United States (black people are not and have never been citizens).

The Republic was brought about, when it was, to frustrate hostile action of the United States against the seekers of land and power for blacks on this continent, and to create proper safeguards for ultimate success.

BROTHER IMARI Detroit, Michigan, Subjugated Territory of the Republic of New Africa

20 August 1968

Introduction

OF the three brothers who bear witness for Malcolm X — known, as we were, by our slave name, the Henry brothers — only Milton was sure from the beginning. I was the last to come to the realization that it was he “who should come” and that there was no need to “look for another.”

I personally saw and spoke to Malcolm X on only four occasions. Once was in Washington, in the lobby of the headquarters hotel just before the 1963 March on Washington; another time, shortly before, was in the Shabazz Restaurant in Detroit. Each time Malcolm smiled, shook my hand and spoke with that characteristic courtesy and brotherliness, but I am sure he did not know me and certainly did not recall me from one meeting to the next. Twice more we were to meet: once, short days before the death of John Kennedy (November 1963) when he came to Detroit to address a rally sponsored by the civil rights group (GOAL — The Group On Advanced Leadership), of which I was president, a moment when Malcolm’s popularity with the Muslim rank-and-file was at an all-time high and he was still within Elijah Muhammad’s “Nation of Islam.”

The last time was a year later, February 14, 1965, the day his home in New York was fire-bombed, one week before his assassination; he came to Detroit, despite the firebombing, to speak at a rally to which Brother Milton and Brother Ajay, owners of the Afro-American Broadcasting Company, had invited him. On this occasion Malcolm had departed Elijah’s “Nation of Islam”; he was sure of his own death to come, magnificently unconcerned but prepared, certain that either Black Muslim enforcers, doing the bidding of Elijah Muhammad, or agents of the United States 3 government would soon succeed against him personally, where both had failed before. We talked at length in his hotel room; I was anxious that we should give national form and specific programmatic direction to the new movement that his break with Elijah signaled. He assured us that it would come. And, when he gave up his life in New York the following Sunday, we were left, I felt, without that direction.

Of course that was not true.

All that we should do, Malcolm had already set out before us. It was left but for us to organize and carry out the work.

So here we come: the Malcolmites, laboring with and speaking for the young black mass who, with more debt to Malcolm than they realize, and more wisdom than we who now join them, began our new War In America. From this moment the cry on our lips, the goal in our hearts, the drive behind our minds, our might, our very lives is LAND AND POWER, on this continent, in our time.

How we shall achieve this is the subject of this first Malcolmite epistle, written in October 1966, which we have called: War In America.

BROTHER IMARI Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A.

January 1968

PART I

THE NEW WARFARE

BACKGROUND OF VIOLENCE

THE black man’s struggle for freedom in America has always been violent. Taken prisoner in violent struggle in Africa, the black man used the violence of shipboard revolts, suicides, and self-mutilation to resist enslavement during the Middle Passage and, once in the New World, enlarged the pattern of revolt, suicide, and self-mutilation to include continuous and widespread sabotage. Throughout this struggle, whose earliest recorded moment occurred in South Carolina in 1526, and which lasted through the end of the Civil War in 1865, the slaveholder unfailingly met black struggle with a harsh and unfettered response.

It is true that from the end of the Civil War until the opening of black guerrilla warfare in New York City (Harlem) in the summer of 1964 — a period of 100 years — the black man in the United States conducted his struggle for freedom without resorting to violence as the institutionalized weapon he had made of it during the previous 300 years; but the struggle was, nonetheless, violent. It was violent precisely because the white man, unlike the black, never forsook violence as a primary instrument of control over the black man. While the black man’s response — sometimes, as in the summer of 1919 (During this summer, in major race riots in 20 cities, black men took a heavy toll of white attackers who, formerly, had met little retaliation, and laid waste to considerable white property), rising to a furious magnificence — was largely defensive and uncertain, the white man’s rape, assault, and murder of the black man continued without let-up throughout the most recent 100 years, as it continues today. And the fact that the white man in the North relies more upon the courts to carry out this violence, than upon the individual white citizen, as in the South, makes the fact of this violence of the white upon the black no less real and no less present.

Indeed, it is precisely the realization of this fact of white violence upon the black — the realization of the FACT, despite camouflage and denial — which brought brave, young black men into the streets of Harlem in 1964 and opened the present period of black warfare.

FIRST GOALS

AN important aspect of the black man’s resumed warfare is that it is being fought largely in the cities of the North. The DEACONS FOR DEFENSE AND JUSTICE, the courageous black armed force that sprang to life in the South, Mississippi and Louisiana, within a year after the first battle was fought in New York’s Harlem, has a leadership that is known and lives openly in the area of conflict: it began as a defensive organization and augurs to remain defensive so long as it is expedient for its leadership to remain exposed and vulnerable. Thus, the only aggressive use of black violence in the South during the first years of renewed black warfare occurred in Birmingham (this event was in 1963 and actually predates the Harlem warfare) and, on a smaller scale, in Atlanta in 1966. As in the North, both sites were large cities. But the big cities of the North have been pre-eminently the battlegrounds, the loci of greatest destruction being Harlem, Rochester, and Philadelphia (1964), Los Angeles (Watts) (1965), and Omaha, Chicago, and Cleveland (1966).

A second important aspect of the renewed black warfare is that it was initiated and carried out during the first three years (1964-1966) by young members of the most exploited class of black people. They were acting spontaneously, with no theoretical framework of knowledge beyond a basic understanding that they were being exploited by white people — deprived of education, jobs, decent housing, health, justice, and dignity — because they were black; with no objectives further than revenge, a free re-distribution of white-owned goods found in the black community, and relief — in any form, in any amount, however small — from the grinding deprivations of joblessness, ill-education, bad housing, and police brutality.

That units of the black underground army were present in Harlem (1964) and destroyed property with noteworthy effectiveness in Watts (1965) and Cleveland (1966) should not be overlooked. Nevertheless, the warfare was initiated not by the militant intellectuals and the organized underground but by the young black mass. Their objectives bear examination.

That a measure of revenge was achieved by the warfare of the black mass is certain. Revenge was taken against the white police who — while amassing a severely higher killedand- wounded toll against black men than black men amassed against them — were turned from swaggering brutes into furtive animals filled with fear and made to seek, in city after city, the help of National Guard (army) units. Revenge was taken, too, against the white economic exploiter. A dominating fact of black existence in the United States is that most of the property (especially where the black poor live) and virtually all of the business are owned by whites. The destruction and looting of these places afforded a measure of revenge and achieved, to a limited degree, another objective: the free re-distribution of goods — foodstuffs, appliances, furniture — belonging to whites and found in the black community.

The objective of meaningful relief from deprivation was more widely frustrated, however. Leaders of black civil rights groups, called upon by the white power structure to speak for the guerrillas, translated the drive for relief into a request for more recreational facilities. Joined by the black militants and the guerrillas themselves, the civil rights groups more correctly translated the drive for dignity into a demand for an end to police brutality. All correctly saw the demand for jobs, for income, as pure and unequitable.

That the demand for jobs was not met was demonstrated in October of 1966 by the issuance of a persistent statistic by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: nationally the unemployment of black people, in that time of national economic prosperity, continued to be more than double that of whites. White unemployment was 3.8 per cent; black unemployment, 7.8 per cent.

On a city-by-city basis the fact was that a few demonstration projects were initiated that amounted to a few more jobs for a painfully few black persons, and employers were verbally urged to stop discriminating. But largely, black people were told (as they had been told for years) to TRY HARDER: get education, dress and speak like middle-class whites. We were told, in short, that black unemployment was due to black people (i.e., our lack of education, lack of initiative), rather than to a design of the white man. Yet the contrary was the truth; statistics adduced by the City of Detroit’s own Commission On Community Relations in May 1963 ("Employment and Income”) were true nationally and to the point: black unemployment was not only twice white, but the median white HIGH SCHOOL graduate earned MORE than the median black COLLEGE graduate, a white with EIGHT YEARS of education MORE than a black with a HIGH SCHOOL (12 YEARS) DIPLOMA, and so on, in such a consistent pattern that the only explanation, this official commission concluded, was racial discrimination.

THE IMPACT OF WHITE RACISM

THE cause of black joblessness was, then, more than anything else, a psychological attitude on the part of whites. That attitude involves, first, a belief in white superiority and second, a commitment to white domination of the human race, the world, and all the world’s goods.

It is an attitude that exerts its presence first in the school systems; virtually every governmental unit in America, including the school boards, is dominated by white people, and their orientation has habitually and continually been WHITE-FIRST: they racially segregate the schools, either by law (this has been unlawful, theoretically, since 1954) or by extra-legal design and then proceed to develop and give superior facilities and programs to white schools, inferior facilities and programs to black schools. Whites, controlling purse-strings and the power of decision over black schools, not only guarantee thereby an inferior education to black children who stay in the schools, but drive large numbers of young black people OUT of the schools. Whites — and their black tools (those black teachers with white-oriented minds) — do this by continuous assaults on the black personality.

It is not so much the teaching of middle-class values — which blacks could learn — but the teaching of WHITE values, which blacks can only acquire at the cost of frustration and self-abasement. From the pictures in mathematics books, through the stories in literature books, to presentations in history texts, one standard of beauty is taught: White beauty. One essential ingredient for genius and courage is taught: the WHITE SKIN. These things the black cannot possibly attain (white beauty is not black beauty; white skin, not black skin). Therefore, functional sanity for the black man, in the normal course of things, cannot be achieved except by accepting black inferiority before white superiority, attaining those white attributes which are attainable — speech, dress, mannerisms, straight hair — and thereafter following the path of least resistance.

Yet the difficulty of attaining even those ATTAINABLE white standards of speech and manners, which confronts many members of the black mass, compounds for them the misery of the learning experience, alienates them from the majority of their fellows (who ARE attaining these values) and, especially, from the white world, and sends them out prematurely from school as “drop-outs.”

But the school system is only the beginning, not the explanation for a black unemployment rate twice as high as the white, for the phenomenon of whites consistently earning more than blacks with three and four years more education. The schools are only a primary place where the psychological orientation of the white man toward white supremacy and his commitment to white domination make their presence felt.

Rather, it is the white supremacist orientation and the commitment to white domination, operating in the minds of thousands of white personnel officers and employers all over the country that is responsible for the total exclusion of black workers (except as custodians) in thousands upon thousands of small and medium-sized plants all over the country. Where large companies are concerned, it is instructive that during six months of 1965 alone the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), moving reluctantly and superficially, filed 1,000 separate complaints of job discrimination against major employers and unions in the United States.

Once there was a great deal of truth in the assertion that the white man oppressed the black man because he needed cheap labor. By the era of the new black warfare (1964) this was no longer true. Highly mechanized, the American industrial society does not even need the black man as a domestic worker. Indeed, the black man was dispensable long before Harlem’s first shot. Black oppression continues today because the mechanisms for it are now built into the fabric of American life. Black oppression is simply the other side of the coin bearing the twin-headed monster of white belief in white supremacy and white commitment to white domination.

It is not simply what the schools teach. It is language, folk art, myths, religion. It is the representation of Christ, the Son of God, in a largely Christian land, as a white man. Courtesy alone, whatever the historical truth, would seem to dictate that in a land where one-tenth of the Christians are black, Christ — or at least SOME of the Biblical characters — would be represented as black SOME of the time. It is the endless glorification in screen and advertising of white beauty, white manners, and white conquest.

More than anything, however, the orientation toward white supremacy — with its corollary of black oppression — is supported and perpetuated by white insistence that white conquest of the world was achieved because white people were smarter and braver than those they conquered. White men will not teach and refuse to believe the simple truth that their conquest was achieved not only through the cultural accident of better arms at crucial moments (throughout history, barbarian peoples have often achieved this advantage over more civilized people), but because they were more ruthless than other peoples in the world. The whole history of white domination and black slavery, since the arrival of Vasco Da Gama off the shores of Kenya in the Fifteenth Century, has been the history of the white man’s savage disregard for simple justice and the equality of man.

THE FIRST HARVEST

THUS, the civil rights groups which spoke for the black guerrillas in the wake of the first three years of guerrilla warfare (1964-1966) diluted the gains which were to be won by the black man. The call for recreational facilities brought a pittance — a contemptuous response of the powerful to the powerless. Requests for fair play from the police could not be granted because white people, in control of the machinery of state, regard the police as their protection against black people — whom they know to have just grievances. Worse, civil rights groups, which joined the white power structure in emphasizing training as the solution to joblessness, were also joining the white power structure in promoting the lie that the black man’s lack of training was the cause of his unemployment. They were thus protecting for the white power structure the real and statistically demonstrable cause of the problem: the white man’s orientation toward white supremacy and his commitment to white domination.

They were, in other words, often unwittingly , preventing movement toward a real solution by moving off on a tangent. Black people are not only kept out of regular jobs by the bias of white hiring people, they are excluded from skilled trade apprentice programs purely by the bias of white skilled trade unionists. Neither situation could be remedied by the training of blacks.

The black militants who spoke for the guerrillas were generally more on target, for they emphasized “control.” They knew the invidious work of the schools and that the white man would not change what was going on in the schools, so they demanded control of black schools. They understood the function of the police, so they demanded partial control of them — review of their actions, increases in black policemen and black command. They demanded control of the federal government’s Poverty programs, supposedly designed to end black joblessness. Fundamentally they failed, even as the civil rights groups failed for other reasons, because they, the militants, had reached the core of what the struggle was about: CONTROL — whether white men or black would control the black man and his destiny. They failed because they, the militants, even supported by the guerrillas, had not arrayed the impression of enough power to make the white man relinquish that control.

PART II

STATE POWER AND

FURTHER WARFARE

THE NORTH AS A BATTLEGROUND

BLACK warfare against white control in the United

States will continue. It will continue not simply because the most exploited level of the black mass is alienated from the white majority or because numerous black militants of all strata have gained a true knowledge of white objectives and white psychology; it will continue because the white man is thoroughly committed to white domination and therefore will not allow the black man to depart peacefully from him, taking only that which in justice belongs to black people, nor will he permit the black man to live in association with him on a basis of real equality, as a power SHARER — unless he is forced to. Black warfare will continue for no other reason than that the white man will have it no other way.

But black warfare will move along new and predictable lines — because WE MUST WIN. First, thoughtful militants know that the Northern cities — where the warfare was fought for the first three years — are indefensible over the long-run. Although black populations in these areas run from 25 to 60 per cent, the cities are islands in the middle of white seas. In time of conflict, white strategy has been to surround black communities in the cities with police and National Guard (army) units, cutting these communities off from the outside. In a serious engagement food supplies within the surrounded areas could be depleted (as happened in Watts) in a week. The water and power supplies could in many instances be cut off, and the lack of sanitation services, including the blocking of sewers, could be used as a weapon against the entire black population of an inner city. Finally, the compactness of black-occupied inner cities in the North lends these cities, once surrounded, to classic and brutal military sweeps. Indeed, with the black man no longer an economic necessity in the United States — he is, in fact, for the white man, a decided inconvenience — the temptation to “solve the problem" by wholesale slaughter in black communities under siege may be too great for the average white leader to resist.

The defense against the white strategy of siege lies in black guerrillas OUT-SIDE of the ringed inner city wreaking havoc upon the factories, offices, police stations, and homes of whites in wide-ranging, random fashion; sabotaging and destroying their power and water and sanitation facilities, as attacks are made on our own. This will draw off forces holding the inner city under siege and serve to remind the white man that he has more to lose than the black man; it will serve, under favorable conditions to inspire the white man to break off military engagement altogether. But this strategy is not sufficient for long-run-decisive success.

The inner cities of the North have other deficiencies. Black functionaries who serve white interests have for more than 30 years been appointed and elected from black areas to posts of political importance in Northern cities. There are scores of black judges, councilmen, and state representatives, but for the most part these people serve white interests first and black interests only incidentally, if at ail. White control of these people and the entire political machinery of the cities is achieved through organization and huge amounts of campaign money. When black officials oppose the white machines in the interests of black people, they are destroyed by the machines — directly, as was Chicago Alderman Benjamin Lewis, assassinated in his office in gangland style, or as was New York Congressman Adam Clayton Powell, who in 1966 was effectively stripped of the vast power which he, as a Committee chairman, had wielded in behalf of black people’s struggle. (In a counterpart action in the big-city South in 1966, Julian Bond of Atlanta, a member of the militant and involved Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee, SNICK, duly elected to the Georgia House of Representatives, was denied his seat by other Georgia House members TWICE — first after the regular election and again after he won re-election in a special election to fill his vacated seat.)

In head-to-head confrontation the white man in the North has control of the voting machines, which are subject to tampering before being installed for an election. In the spring of 1964 an all-black political party, the Freedom Now Party, won a place on the Michigan ballot and waged an exciting, intensive campaign for election of a full slate of candidates in the November contest. When a running tally of ballots for the Party’s gubernatorial candidate was given on election night, he had well over 20,000 votes; but when the final official tally was given, that vote was reduced to just over 4,000 (black militant organizations had more than 4,000 vote-age members in the Detroit area alone)! But militants drew a lesson from that election: if black people don’t control the state-wide election machinery, there is no guarantee that votes will be counted. And in the North, where black populations county and state-wide are considerably less, proportionately, than they are in the cities, there is virtually no chance in the normal course of things of gaining control of the election machinery.

Ultimately whites in the North have prepared another procedure to keep real political power out of the hands of blacks, preparing against the day when black numbers and black sentiment in the cities make it impossible for whites to control the candidates and dangerous to rig the voting machines. That procedure is called COUNTY HOME-RULE: it is the act of moving the REAL POWER of government — taxing, police, planning — from the city-level, where blacks would dominate, to the county-level, where whites dominate.

Thus, the Northern cities, because of large concentrations of black people, are suitable for possible spectacular holding actions: astute political activity could elect black judges, councilmen and representatives who are black oriented and able to afford certain limited protection to the black struggle and those active in it; and the Northern cities can also provide foci from which to inflict severe guerrilla damage upon the white man’s property and industry, to make him (possibly) stop and think. But the Northern cities are militarily indefensible over the long-run and completely unamenable to black political control.

THE SOUTH AS A BATTLEGROUND

THE South, however, is another matter. For in the

Deep South — Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina — there are many counties populated with over-whelming black majorities. Indeed, the 1960 U. S. census showed black people in Mississippi as being 42% of the population; in Louisiana, 32% of the population; in Alabama, 30%; in Georgia, 29%, and in South Carolina, 35%. Given the patterns of concealment routinely practiced by blacks against the power structure, the actual figures are apt to be 10% or more higher. In the South numbers are our strength. In the South, too, black people are not concentrated in vulnerable islands as we are in the North; with the land all around us and the farms to support us, in the South our military prospects brighten like gold.

The political prospects, because of our numbers, are equally auspicious. Here, in the Deep South, black people may run through to its natural conclusion our political destiny in this country. Our numbers give us the basis for state control in Mississippi, the possibility of state control in Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina, provided that conditions could be created to induce less than one-fourth of the 12 million black people now living outside of these states to immigrate to them. (Author’s Note: This is another story, but such immigration is not unparalleled in history. Note the Jewish settlement of Israel; the British settlement of Australia, Rhodesia, South Africa, the New World; the American settlement of the West, and the Mormon settlement of Utah.)

STATE POWER

THE importance of state control becomes crystal clear when seen against the objectives and failures of the valiant black guerrillas in the North’s big cities from 1964 through 1966. Every goal sought by them could have been achieved — instead of frustrated — had they, instead of the whites, been in control of state power. Transplanted to Mississippi, the course of events would be obvious. To control state power is to control the state police and (to that degree that black state power could stand against white federal power) to control the state National Guard. Under control of emancipated blacks the state police could be purged of racists by simple legal procedures involving indefinite suspension of all policemen accused of racist activity, pending trial board action. This would mean indefinite suspension of virtually every white man on the force, and while they litigated their suspensions in the courts (mostly in the state courts of emancipated black justices) their jobs would be filled by emancipated blacks. State power could thus end police brutality against blacks; indeed, it would convert the police into a force supporting black people.

Obviously, too, state power under emancipated blacks would be used to purify the school system and bring to black children the best possible education.

State power could be used to end unemployment. Since statistics positively show that black unemployment and under-employment are largely caused by racial discrimination, state power, in the hands of emancipated black men, could be used to open the doors of plants to black workers — or seize them entirely as penalties for persistent discrimination. No trade union would be allowed to operate in the state unless it admitted black apprentices and made a floodgate effort to make up for the exclusions of the past.

More than this, state power in the hands of emancipated blacks would be used to make jobs. Black people in the United States have existed as a colony within a nation. We have been exploited for our building skills and our labor — our raw materials — and we own not a half-dozen manufacturing facilities worthy of the name, no sea or air shipping companies, and scarcely 15 banks. Even the farms, for the most part, are not ours. State power would be used as it is used in every other colony that achieves its freedom: to launch industries OWNED BY THE PEOPLE, to benefit the people. Not only would power (electricity, gas, atomic energy) and communications come under state direction, but the state would go directly into agriculture and industry, assisting private owners, on the one hand, as banks should do, and directly opening manufacturing plants, shipping lines, and other needed, job-making, prosperity-creating concerns, on the other hand.

In short, state power could and would be used by emancipated blacks to create A NEW SOCIETY, based on brotherhood and justice, free of organized crime, free of exploitation of man by man, and functioning in a way to make possible for everyone the realization of his finest potentialities. (What must be made clear in this chapter is that black people, running a “state” which remains within the United States federal union, could, under the best conditions, end police brutality as outlined in the first paragraph of this chapter. Black state power of this sort could also, conceivably, purify the educational system. But both these objectives run counter to what the “American” system stands for, and would therefore tend to meet the same kind of federal opposition which makes the accomplishment of the goals of the last paragraphs (i.e., ending employment discrimination and making full employment) impossible through the use of state power within the United States federal union. The state power referred to here is the power of a free and independent separate state. Part III, following, explains why.)

MISSISSIPPI

BECAUSE of powers reserved to the individual states under the United States federal constitution, the state level of government is the ideal level (as opposed to the city or county level) at which black power could be brought to bear in creation of THE NEW SOCIETY. Even with the rapid and extensive growth of federal power and control since 1932, the state still retains tremendous regulatory and initiatory powers over life within its borders. Police and national guard, taxing and banking, election machinery and courts, licensing of many sorts all remain under broad state jurisdiction. And Mississippi, primarily because of its great black population and its seaports (on the Gulf of Mexico), seems the most favorable state in which Black People might reach toward the logical conclusion of our destiny in this land, might attempt to build THE NEW SOCIETY under black control. (The founding of the Republic of New Africa has made it unnecessary for revolutionaries to seek control of the state within the U.S. federal union. Our work is the direct work of winning consent of the people to the jurisdiction of the Republic of New Africa and away from the United States.)

If black people are successful in Mississippi, a systematic attempt would be made to bring three million similarly minded black people from the North into Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina, so that these states might also be brought under black control and into a five-state union with Mississippi, with ports on both the Atlantic and the Gulf — a smaller union than the old 11-state Confederacy, to be sure, but with infinitely greater prospects for success. But THE ROAD TO BLACK CONTROL in Mississippi is perilous and by no means accomplished by our mere wishing it.

For if the state of Mississippi in 1966 contained the most valuable asset for black control (a near-majority of black people), it also contained all the obstacles to black control found in the other states — and one more: open and ubiquitous white violence.

The move to subvert black power in Mississippi and deliver black candidates into the hands of white control once blacks achieve the vote in that state was well underway by 1966. It was being engineered by the United Auto Workers (UAW) industrial union and carried out by small cadres of black and white unionists, some from within the state, some from without, who were wooing black vote registration workers with money to underwrite a state-wide registration campaign — a campaign which the very black organizations being wooed (the Elks and Masons, teacher societies, professional associations, voters leagues, fraternities, sororities) could, with sacrifice, themselves underwrite. Anxious for any sign of good faith and decency on the part of whites, anxious not to subvert any genuine effort at inter-racial cooperation in a state where a lack of inter-racial cooperation constantly bedevils life, black leaders in 1966 seemed inclined to accept the UAW aid. They were acting without a knowledge of the way the UAW for over 20 years has treacherously used its money and organization to subvert black interests in Detroit.

For, if the Mafia corrupts and despoils black effort in Chicago; if Tammany Hall (the Democratic Party) makes a mockery of black people in New York, and if machine politics and a slave mentality in black officials in Cleveland undermine black power there, in Detroit it is the United Auto Workers (AFL-CIO), under its president Walter Reuther, that has been the constant enemy of black unity and black progress. In 1966, at a moment when it appeared that black people in Detroit might elect several judges to the 13- member city court — where prior to 1966 only one white-thinking black jurist sat and where black people have constantly been victimized in an open judicial travesty the UAW refused to support the one non-incumbent black candidate, George Crockett, with the best chance of election. Indeed, UAW workers within the Democratic Party successfully used their power to deprive Crockett of the important endorsement of the First Congressional District Democratic Party organization (a predominantly black district which sent John Conyers to Congress). The result was calculated to be disastrous for black Detroiters — even though Crockett is not a “black-thinking” lawyer he is, by other lawyers’ estimation, one of the fine legal minds of the state, and he is socially conscious. The UAW action was calculated to return the city court safely to white hands for as many as 12 years to come.

In 1965, when a general cry arose from the Detroit black community to elect three black persons to the all-white nine-member city council, the UAW spurned support of such a campaign, instead threw its aid to an obscure black party functionary, a gifted but innocuous black minister, and a number of whites of limited talents, while talented black candidates with programs for progress (Jackie Vaughn, Reverend Albert Cleage) were spurned. In 1964 UAW functionaries and allies fought the Michigan Freedom Now Party, and the UAW gave its support — as it had in years past — to the worst white racist, Samuel Olsen, ever to occupy the Wayne County (Detroit) prosecutor’s office. In 1962 the UAW opposed the drive to elect three black men to Congress (that was the last year when it would be possible in Detroit for years to come). The record is nearly endless — and CONSISTENT in the UAW’s dedication to white control and the subversion of independent black candidates.

Worst, in its own area of organized labor, the UAW has failed to wage any meaningful campaign to force skilled trade unions to accept black apprentices in number. The UAW is a wolf in lamb’s clothing, and it has descended upon black people in Mississippi as upon peaceful sheep.

(Curiously, one of the black salaried UAW functionaries periodically at work in Mississippi, Horace Sheffield, has himself been the victim of Walter Reuther’s arbitrariness and disdain for black people. In disfavor with Reuther over internal matters, including Reuther’s favoring of another white-thinking black functionary, UAW national vice president Nelson Jack Edwards, Sheffield was ordered by Reuther in early 1966 to move to Washington. This would have removed Sheffield from the prominence he had gained in Detroit as a newspaper columnist and a leader of the civil rights-oriented Trade Union Leadership Council (TULC). It would have cleared a height in the black community for Edwards, who had founded an organization similar to TULC and become a columnist in the same UAW-dominated newspaper, the Michigan Chronicle, a black-owned weekly, which had given Sheffield his first column space. Reuther finally relented on the demand that Sheffield move to Washington — ONLY after black civil rights groups in Detroit had created a storm over removal of a black LEADER but not before reminding Detroit blacks that Sheffield worked for him, Reuther, not them. Thereafter, Mr. Sheffield was assigned to spend most of his time on the road — including Mississippi.)

THE ANTI-BLACK BLACKS

CONCERTED efforts of white organizations like the UAW to dominate the black vote in Mississippi are not the only obstacles to black control. There is what has become known as the “TUSKEGEE SYNDROME.” This refers to the state of the black mind in Tuskegee, Alabama, where, in 1965, a black voting majority, after a campaign by leading black people in the community against black government, voted a white majority into office.

The sources of this syndrome are not hard to identify. Raised on a saturation diet of white supremacy, believing that God himself and his son too are white, great numbers of black people in America have a secret, abiding love of the white man that flows from deep recesses of the subconscious mind. It is matched by a complementary subconscious hate of black people, of self, and manifests itself in a pervasive doubt of black ability to succeed at anything. These ingrained attitudes in black people have been played upon — to the detriment of every movement for black unity and black self-help in our history — by white-dominated organizations like the NAACP, which for 50 years has held the spotlight in the fight for freedom. These organizations teach, as gospel, that racial INTEGRATION is the only solution to our problems (they preach this to black people, not to white) and that “all-black” organizations in the fight for freedom are “segregation” and this “segregation,” like the other segregation, is bad. (ALL-BLACK churches and undertakers and barrooms are alright.) This teaching squares easily with the black man’s sub-conscious self-doubt: many black people are easily convinced, therefore, that “anything all-black is all wrong.”

They are especially convinced and led astray in this regard because the actions of MOST — thank God, NOT ALL — leaders of black communities are designed to lead them astray. Great numbers of black teachers and professors, great numbers of college-educated black people who fill leadership positions (often because they are designated by whites) in black communities believe in their own inferiority but believe even more in the inferiority of their less well situated brothers. It is they, together with the minority of cynical, bought blacks, who are the passkey to the first and greatest barrier — black disunity — to black control in any community. Because of these people, black unity in the past has been impossible; without these people, black people would have nothing to fear from attempts of outsiders, like the UAW, to control black candidates and black politics. We would have considerably less to fear than we now do from economic or even physical attacks from whites.

While these black leaders almost always profit from their subservience to whites, and some perform for whites for no reason other than profit, most are motivated by a conviction that there is no other course. For all this, these people are no less dangerous and obstructive to the acquisition of black power in Mississippi (or elsewhere) than were they motivated purely by profit. Those motivated by profit have from the very beginning forfeited their right to existence; those motivated by conviction are due a brief solicitation, but, after that, their further existence, unreconstructed, cannot be justified.

It is a question of halting, in good time, IN OUR TIME, the coercive rapes which our sisters suffer routinely at the hands of white swine; it is a question of preventing the extinguishing of light in the eyes of bright young black children, still too young to know; of ending the blind squandering of genius, and beloved mediocrity; of banishing all manner of injustice which our people hourly suffer, the continued crushing of self-respect, the stifling of ambition and hope; of ending exploitation; of bringing, with all speed, a new and better life, a new and brighter world, a NEW SOCIETY.

VIOLENCE

IF we cannot tolerate those within our ranks who work against black unity, we must resolutely destroy whites who attempt to inflict violence upon us. Those who labor for the New Society must harbor no secret doubts about the white man’s dedication to white domination; failure to understand the magnitude and completion of this dedication could be more fatal to our movement than many armies. History must be instructive to us. Stanley and Rhodes in Africa are classic examples of white men who ingratiated themselves with blacks, exchanged solemn commitments of friendship and consummated treaties — not so that men of different cultures might learn from one another, trade with one another, and live in peace, but only to use this ingratiation, these exchanges of friendship commitments and treaties to deliver blacks to white domination. White men are without honor in power encounters with people of color; they have no scruples that prevent the use of any method, the stooping to any perfidy to gain or maintain white domination.

In the United States itself the history of the white man’s dealings with the Indian in white conquest of the West parallels the treachery of Stanley and Rhodes in Africa: no treaty that was not a convenience broken at white will, no friendship that was not turned to service of white domination.

The character of the white-run war against Japan exemplified the attitude of unbridled savagery which the white American indulges toward people of color: the wide-spread use of flame-throwers and fire-bombs in the Pacific, contrasted with their limited use in Europe; the use of the atomic bomb. Yet little parallels the 100 years of white lynching of blacks in America — the open and systematic murder of defenseless thousands in the years just after the Civil War and just after Reconstruction; the burning-alive and mutilation of children, as well as hapless adults; the sudden unanswered disappearances in the back-country; the use of the courts, the electric chair, the policeman’s gun and club to take away the liberty, the limbs, the faculties, and the lives of hundreds of thousands of black people. Hardly anything parallels this; but the conduct of the white man (who in 1966 was using 100 thousand unthinking black troops along with the white) in pursuing the war in Viet Nam is a concentrated exercise in kind. Here, again, is the wanton destruction of people’s homes; the burning to death, by napalm (flaming jelly) and flame-throwers, of hundreds upon hundreds of Vietnamese women and children huddled in holes — on the excuse that guerrillas might be huddled there with them; the maiming of countless more; the saturation bombing of huge tracts of populated country simply because it is held by “the enemy.” (Black people MUST disassociate ourselves from this criminal and barbarous American effort.)

If we learn nothing from Africa, nothing from the racist conduct of the war against Japan, and nothing from the war in Viet Nam, our own 100 years of lynching in this country, concurrent as it was with the white man’s treacherous and systematic extermination of the Indian, must teach us that whites who attack us must be pursued to their sources and destroyed completely at their sources. This must be so, whether the racist criminal wears a policeman’s uniform or not.

We must remember that at the end of Reconstruction, when racist whites had no state power in their hands, they drove black people from the government and from the electorate using a night-riding, civilian vigilante force. With state power in their hands, they have continued for more than 80 years to cultivate the white civilian capacity for violence. In Mississippi, where the black drive for power must proceed in county-wide campaigns as a prelude to total control of the state, black workers face, as they have in the past, violence emanating from white racists operating illegally under cover of state power (the police) as well as violence from white vigilante-type organizations and white individuals acting illegally on their own. All three must be utterly destroyed, county-by-county, using the black underground army first and, then, the county sheriff’s organizations as the counties come under our control. Anything short of this is to make a mockery of claims of black control, is to leave for future flowering the seeds of resurgent white violence, a fundamental deterrent to the New Society.

GOD, MEN AND VIOLENCE

WHEN black men are called upon to fight in the United States Army and are sent, as they are in Viet Nam, to take the lives of foreign patriots who bear them no ill will, no cry is raised that black men should practice non-violence and refuse to go. But when black men are urged to arms to protect themselves in the race struggle in the United States, the cry of non-violence for blacks fills all the land. It will fill it again now. It does not matter. What matters is what black men themselves think. Those of us in the struggle who are atheists and agnostics, those who are animists and those who follow Islam are unfettered by the chains which a perjured teaching has placed upon those of us who are Christian.

More than any man in recent years Martin Luther King is responsible for this criminal crippling of the black man in his struggle. King took an incredibly beautiful, a matchlessly challenging doctrine — redemption through love and self-sacrifice — and corrupted it through his own disbelief. Martin Luther King’s non-violence is a shallow deceit: on no less than three occasions between 1961 and 1965 King called for or condoned (as when Watts occurred) the use of troops. But he urges black people to non-violence. If he did this because he did not think we could win violently, and said so, that would be one thing; but he tells black people to be nonviolent because violence is wrong and unjustifiable. And yet he calls for armies, WHITE-RUN armies. . .

Black Christians must remember that while Christ taught peace, forgiveness, and forbearance, his disciple Peter carried a sword and used it in Christ’s defense at Gethsemane, Christ himself spoke of legions of angels who would fight for him, and Christ himself turned to violence to drive the money-changers from the temple.

There are Christian black men in the struggle, seeking to serve God and loving mankind, who like Christ with the money-changers, have seen the uselessness of further forbearance and have therefore committed themselves to unrelenting violence against violent whites. They are men who hate violence and seek a day when men will practice war no more, but who know that at this juncture in history we are left no other course. If the white man were to be redeemed and reconciled to us by our love, he would have been reconciled before the one hundredth year, because we have loved him mightily. If the white man were to be saved by our suffering, the last ten years from Montgomery through Magnolia County and Birmingham to Chicago — the sacrifice of the actual lives and sight and health and chastity of our dearest black children, many, like those in the Birmingham bombing, not yet teenagers — this non-violent, loving, unstinting sacrifice should have saved him. The fact is that our continued non-violence will NOT change the white man and would lead US only to extermination.

God is with us, to be sure. But the natural miracle is a rare and thoroughly intractable phenomenon; for the most part, the miracles of God are worked through the brains and arms of men. God will deliver us, but CANNOT unless we act. And if we act, with resolve, we can hack out in this American jungle of racism, exploitation and the acceptance of organized crime, one place in this hemisphere where men of good will may build the GOOD NEW SOCIETY and work for the reconstruction of the whole human world.

PART III

THE NEW SOCIETY

FEDERAL OPPOSITION

NEXT to black disunity, and a greater threat even than the presence of white violence is the power which the federal government can and almost certainly will bring to bear against black efforts to transform Mississippi into a model state. An impressive array of law and court decisions exists to interfere with the use of state power to end unemployment through state-run industry. The federal court system with its enforcement arm of U.S. Marshals, rarely used to benefit black people, represents a hostile force within the borders of the state to enforce anti-black court decrees; the state National Guard, taken from state control by nationalization, would stand with the regular U.S. military establishment and the marshals as an instrument for frustrating black state power under the guise of enforcing anti-black federal court decrees. Beyond this, the federal presence, ready to be expanded like the tentacles of an octopus, pervades agriculture, vocational training, employment planning, health, transportation, labor relations — in short, a host of central state activities where arbitrary federal actions could seriously impair, if not destroy, programs instituted by enlightened black state power.

That federal power would be used to destroy black power is certain not simply because of the explicit statements against black power made in 1966 by such leaders as Lyndon Johnson and Robert Kennedy, or alone because the deep commitment of white Americans to white domination is so demonstrable. It is certain because federal power has been used in the recent past specifically to destroy black power.

A flagrant example is the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party (MFDP). This party organized to work within the national Democratic Party and in 1964 achieved an overwhelming consensus of support of blacks in Mississippi who would have been eligible to vote had they not been prevented because they were black. The MFDP went to the Democratic Party's national presidential convention in Atlantic City in the summer of 1964 and asked to be seated instead of the Eastland faction as the official Democratic delegation from Mississippi. Despite the MFDP’s presentation of evidence that the Eastland faction was systematically depriving black people of the vote and despite the MFDP’s showing that the Eastland faction had not supported the national Democratic Party’s candidates in Mississippi and the MFDP’s assurances that the MFDP did and would support the national party in Mississippi, the national party refused to take accreditation away from the all-white Eastland faction and give it to the inter-racial MFDP. This was the party of Lyndon Baines Johnson and all the Kennedy-Johnson white liberals, and Lyndon Johnson was President.

Again in January 1965 three women MFDP Congressional candidates — Mrs. Fannie Lou Hamer, Mrs. Annie Devine and Mrs. Victoria Gray — who had won election in a special election held under great difficulty largely in churches in 56 of Mississippi’s 82 counties, presented themselves at the convening Congress and asked to be seated instead of the regular, illegally elected (95 per cent of Mississippi’s eligible black voters were not allowed to vote), all-white five-man delegation. Once more they were denied: once more, despite an explicit constitutional provision which gives the Congress the right to choose between such challenging parties; once more, despite the ability of Lyndon Johnson at that time to muster overwhelming majorities in the Congress on virtually any subject. To be sure, the seating of Mrs. Hamer, Devine, and Gray would have accomplished a power revolution in the state of Mississippi: it would have broken the exclusive power of Eastland, dividing that power with the MFDP’s chairman Aaron Henry. Yet it would have been a revolution WITHIN the Democratic Party, subject to national party jurisdiction and discipline. But federal power was used to prevent even this reasoned and generous compromise.

Politically this action was of a piece with the later use of federal power (in 1966) to strip Congressman Powell of the power he was using to benefit blacks, and the reluctant performance of the federal courts in keeping from Representative Julian Bond the seat he had legally won in the Georgia House of Representatives.

Further, no state governor has ever been arrested and charged by federal authorities with violating his oath to uphold the U.S. constitution, although several Southern governors — notable among them: Barnett, Coleman, Faubus, Wallace — have not only publicly declared their intention not to uphold federal law but have systematically violated federal law in matters of schooling, voting, and the protection of civil rights. When bodies of three unidentified black men were dredged up in Mississippi rivers during the search for three slain civil rights workers in 1964, federal power was not used to find the murderers of these innocents, though it was clear the state would not attempt to do so; nor has federal power been used to prevent or solve the countless murders committed against nondescript blacks in Mississippi (or elsewhere) before and since then. This failure to use federal power is in fact a studied use of federal power to uphold white domination.

And what is true of politics and murder has been true of employment and housing. Federal power has never been used to impose penalties upon industry to end discrimination — and discrimination accounts for more than half of black unemployment. In housing black people have since 1961 pleaded in vain for relief from the heartless ravages and hardships worked upon us by federally sponsored urban renewal; blacks in Harlem, forced into one of the greatest concentrations of housing unfit for human habitation in the world, during the same period (1961-1966) conducted rent strikes designed to force the owners of this housing to improve it but received only indifference and hostility from the federal government.

Interestingly, the single most powerful man in housing in the federal government during this period was a black man, Robert Weaver; while the second most powerful man in the federal anti-job discrimination machinery was also a black man, Hobart Taylor. Their failure to take these actions in industry and housing which would be simple, natural recourse to a black power government in Mississippi may indeed reflect their lack of courage and lack of identification with the black mass, but more than this it reflects a disarming white liberal disposition in America that came into vogue with John Kennedy: the tendency to select blacks for high government posts so long as these blacks support white domination, serve white interests, and take no initiatives in behalf of the black mass. It reflects, finally, a rock-firm opposition to black freedom, a clear and determined use of federal power to maintain white domination of the black man in the United States.

Because the presence of federal power within a state is so pervasive (i.e., through the federal courts, federal agricultural agents, federal participation in employment planning and labor relations, schooling, health, transportation, etc.) the federal government has a capacity for destroying black state power which is far beyond the capacity of whites within any given state. Worse: it not only has the capacity, it has the WILL to use that capacity. But this capacity and will are not without a potent counter.

THE ANSWER TO FEDERAL OPPOSITION

THE answer to federal opposition to black state power is a complex of studied moves POLITICAL, DIPLOMATIC, ECONOMIC, AND MILITARY.

The crucial first step is the early acceptance of an essential and inevitable decision by those who seek black state power. This is the decision to withdraw the state (ultimately, withdraw the entire, new, five-state union of Mississippi, Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina) from the United States and establish a separate nation.

This is necessary because the inevitable opposition of the federal government would be irresistible so long as it operates within the state; it must be put OUTSIDE the state.

Of first importance are the diplomatic moves. As Malcolm X taught, the black man’s struggle must be INTERNATIONALIZED, for it is only within the United States that we are a minority. Joined with other peoples of color beyond the American borders, black men bestow upon white men the status of a minority. The struggle must be internationalized for an even more basic and directly negotiable reason: we must draw to our cause the moral and material support of people of good will throughout the world; this support, correctly used, could impose upon the United States federal government an amount of caution sufficient, when coupled with the military viability of the black state itself, to protect that state from destruction beneath certain and overwhelming federal power.

In short, the effort to win public support for the black struggle from the Afro-Asian nations, started in earnest by Malcolm X and maintained so resolutely by Robert Williams, MUST BE CONTINUED AND INTENSIFIED; we must, moreover, continue and intensify the effort to raise serious, substantial questions concerning the status of black people in the United States and bring these questions before the United Nations and the World Court. Fortunately, the groundwork for this effort has already (by 1966) been faithfully laid by such men as Robert A. Brock, founder of Los Angeles’ SELF-DETERMINATION COMMITTEE, and Baba Oserjeman Adefumi, founder of the New York-headquartered YORUBA COMMUNITY.

As Adefumi, Brock, and their fellow workers have shown, the central questions to be brought before the United Nations and the World Court are two:

A. THE RIGHT OF BLACK PEOPLE AS FREE MEN TO CHOOSE WHETHER OR NOT THEY WISH TO BE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES. This right was never exercised: freed from slavery by constitutional provision, black people were given no choice as to whether they wished to be citizens, go back to Africa or to some other country, or set up an independent nation. Instead, the OBLIGATIONS of citizenship were automatically conferred upon us by the white majority, while the RIGHTS of citizenship for black people were made conditional rather than absolute, circumscribed by a constitutional provision that “Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation," and subjected to 90 years of interpretation and re-interpretation by the courts, the Congress, and the state legislatures. Adjudication of this question must bestow upon those black people wishing it a guarantee of their right to be free of the jurisdiction of the United States and assure that their right to freedom shall not have been jeopardized by the payment of taxes, participation in the election process, or service in the military during the period before adjudication. These later acts are participated in by the blacks in America who seek adjudication, only under coercion and as defensive measures.

B. THE RIGHT OF BLACK PEOPLE TO REPARATIONS FOR THE INJURIES AND WRONGS DONE US AND OUR ANCESTORS BY REASON OF UNITED STATES LAW. Reparations have never been paid to black people for the admitted wrongs of slavery (or since slavery) inflicted upon our ancestors with the sanction of the United States Constitution — which regulated the slave trade and provided for the counting of slaves — and the laws of several states. The principle of reparations for national wrongs, as for personal wrongs, is well established in international law. The West German government, for instance, has paid 850 million dollars in equipment and credits, in reparations to Israel for wrongs committed by the Nazis against the Jews of Europe. Demands for reparations, funneled through a united black power Congress, must include not only the demand for money and goods such as machinery, factories and laboratories, but a demand for land. And the land we want is the land where we are: MISSISSIPPI, LOUISIANA, ALABAMA, GEORGIA, and SOUTH CAROLINA.

The bringing of the first question to the United Nations — the question of black people’s right to self-determination — creates a substantial question demanding action by that world body and puts the black power struggle in America into the world spotlight where the actions of the United States against us are open to examination and censure by our friends throughout the world. It provides these friends, moreover, with a legal basis for their expressions of support and their work in our behalf.

The raising of the demand for land, as part of the reparations settlement, infuses needed logic and direction into the American black struggle and increases the inherent justice of our drive for black state power and the separation of the new five-state union from the United States.

The separation is necessary because history assures us that the whites of America would not allow a state controlled by progressive black people, opposed to the exploitation and racism and organized crime of the whole, to exist as a part of the whole. Separation is necessary because black people must separate ourselves from the guilt we have borne as partners, HOWEVER RELUCTANT, to the white man in his oppression and crimes against the rest of humanity. Separation is possible because, first, it is militarily possible.

When the 13 American colonies declared their independence from Britain, they also forged an alliance with France, which not insignificantly contributed to the colonies’ victory. When the Confederacy separated from the United States, it formed alliances with Britain and other European powers, and these alliances might have sustained her independence had not this creature been so severely weakened by sabotage and revolts of the slaves themselves and their service in the Union Army. In more recent times the state of Israel was created in 1948 and maintained against Arab arms by her alliances with the United States and Britain. In 1956 the independence of Egypt was maintained against invasion by Israel, supported by France and Britain, by her alliance with Russia: Russia threatened to drop atomic missiles on London if the invaders did not withdraw. In 1959-1960 an independent, anti-capitalist Cuba was saved from invasion and subjugation by American might (as American might would invade and subjugate another small Caribbean island republic, the Dominican Republic, in 1965) because, again, of an alliance with Russia.

The lesson is clear: black power advocates must assiduously cultivate the support of the Afro-Asian world. MORE, that moment when state power comes into our hands is the same moment when formal, international alliances must be announced. Indeed, these alliances may prove our only guarantee of continued existence.

CHINA

IN 1966, as he had in 1963, the leader of the CHINESE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC, MAO TSE TUNG, pledged support of the Afro-American’s struggle in America. Because China was in 1966 the only Afro-Asian nuclear power, and because China augured soon to have delivery systems — missiles and submarines — capable of striking anywhere in the world, China becomes able to exercise upon the United States the same kind of nuclear deterrence which the United States and Russia exercise upon one another, and which Russia exercised upon Britain in 1956 to save the independence of Egypt. ALLIANCE WITH CHINA IS, THEREFORE, OF UTMOST IMPORTANCE. The presence of Chinese nuclear subs in the Gulf of Mexico, supporting black people in Mississippi who have well made their case for independence and land before the United Nations, may tend to discourage the overt and reckless use of federal arms to wreck black power.

Yet alliance with China may prove more difficult, psychologically, for black people than logic might suggest. Subjected to the rampant racism that all Americans must daily live and breathe, many black Americans have not only absorbed an abhorrence for " communism” (which, almost like racism, is also constantly taught) but have absorbed the fear-hate reaction toward the Chinese which white people possess. Black people must remember, where communism is concerned, that white Americans have no fear of white communists that prevents them from giving aid to Yugoslavia, trading with Poland, Hungary, Rumania, and Czechoslovakia, and seeking the broadest types of commercial and cultural relations with the Soviet Union. If white Americans do not fear WHITE communists, why should Americans of color fear communists of color?

The answer, of course, is race prejudice. But black people should remember that 300 years before Vasco Da Gama, a white man, sailed around the horn of Africa and rained death, mutilation and destruction upon the prosperous cities of the black Swahili, the Chinese had been trading IN PEACE AND FRIENDSHIP with these same blacks. The Zeng (the blacks) and the Chinese exchanged ambassadors. Indeed, the whole history of contact between yellow and black stands in marked and beautiful contrast to the history of contact between white and black. This tradition of peace and friendship with the Chinese, of mutual respect, is the tradition upon which black power advocates build.

ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL VIABILITY

IF international military alliances can preserve us, the creation of new political and economic arrangements can strengthen us.

The manner in which the United States used economic sanctions in an effort to strangle Cuba once military adventures became too risky is an object lesson in what lies in store for black state power concurrent with and after federal military power is neutralized. The problem of white technicians leaving factories and laboratories would be met in the same way that Egypt met the problem when white pilots suddenly left the Suez Canal and predicted the canal would become a silt-filled ditch in a month. President Nasser used available Egyptian pilots to train others and hired additional pilots from friendly countries: the canal hardly lost a day because of the pilots and is operating more efficiently and more profitably than ever before. Black people in America have sufficient skills within our own ranks to run virtually every industrial and research facility necessary. Where there is a paucity of skills, the black government could contract for these from Japan, China, Africa, wherever they are to be found and are friendly.

The problem of foreign exchange and capital is less easily met; but it has been met, albeit with sacrifice and difficulty, by China, Guinea, and Cuba, countries most isolated from their traditional avenues of financial intercourse, and it can be met by the black power state. The reality is that the creation of a black power state from states now within the continental United States will itself diminish the power of the United States to control world commerce and foreign exchange, just as expenditures for the war in Viet Nam through 1966, while the U.S. attempted to maintain a peacetime footing at home, were seriously impairing the stability of the U.S. dollar and the ability of the U.S. to resist gold-drain pressures imposed on her by other countries. The reality is that power positions in the world DO change, and sometimes very rapidly. American power to strangle black government in 1974 will be less than it was during the 1960’s when it tried — and failed — to strangle Cuba.

Black power government must look for economic relations not toward the hostile United States but toward the black-run West Indies and Guyana, Cuba, Haiti, the Dominican Republic; toward new common market arrangements involving these countries as well as countries in Africa, Asia, South America, and the Pacific.

The economic arrangements can grow gradually into greater political arrangements, uniting, first, perhaps, the black power state on the U.S. continent with the states of the West Indies and Guyana in a stronger and more durable federation than was before possible. From this could follow other political unions with Guinea, Tanzania, and other countries in Africa, strengthening us all against exploitation from within and without, securing to us all most firmly the hope for a better life.

And black people in America must remember that they come not as beggars to these new alliances: we will bring numbers — perhaps nine million people — and skills and capital and a sure knowledge of the enemy. We will bring too, God willing, by the dawning of our moment of truth, a vision and dedication, a spirit of sacrifice equal to that of our brothers in Africa, in China and Southeast Asia, in all places where men strive resolutely for a better world.

Meanwhile, in the cities of the North, the captive islands where black men live in seas of racist, dominating whites, black people can support the black power movement and, finally, the black power state by using their power in Congress, so long as it lasts, to restrain the hand of the United States in repression of the black power movement and state. The power of black men as Northern judges and state and city officials can be used to protect from injustice members of the black underground army, who serve us all. Not least, the pursuit of political power in the Northern cities will for some time continue to be necessary for the protection of our people there, for changing within the black community the anti-black atmosphere, fed by the schools and communications media, so that those good black people heretofore lost to our struggle through self-doubt and self-hate may instead be enlisted in the cause.

Too, those in the North, like those in the South who are able, must begin the rigorous self-discipline which is necessary to success of black power. Among other things this involves the accumulation of capital and the support of our struggle. A meritorious suggestion is that two per cent (2%) of every worker’s take-home earnings (that is, those workers who believe in black power) be applied to the struggle as a voluntary tax: one per cent (1%) for the local struggle, half for communications and other expenses and half for savings or economic development plans; and one per cent (1%) for the struggle in the South, again half for economic development.

CONCLUSION

NOW, herein is a prognosis for the war in America — indeed, a plan, believed by the author to be founded in history and constructed from the realities and necessities of our time, a plan which follows through to logical conclusions the implications of the drive for black power.

This plan calls for:

1. A HOLDING ACTION IN THE NORTH, with armed black communities, sympathetic to the Republic of New Africa, and supporting the Republic with money, skills, information, political pressure, and people;

2. A MAJOR DRIVE TO WIN BLACK CONTROL in Mississippi, where a near-majority of black people live, based on the principle of winning consent of the people: convincing black people to take their consent from the government of the United States and give that consent to the government of the Republic of New Africa; this is concurrent with similar drives for black control in Louisiana, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina.

3. A VIGOROUS MILITARY CAMPAIGN, based on our defense of property in the South purchased by the Republic of New Africa and defense of land over which the Republic claims sovereignty by reason of black people (a) having lived traditionally on the land and worked it, (b) having fought for the land and clung to it, and (c) having taken their consent from the United States and given it to the Republic of New Africa;

4. THE PURSUIT IN THE UNITED NATIONS of the Recognition of the independence and sovereignty of the Republic of New Africa and the right of black people to reparations, including not only money, machinery, factories, and laboratories, but land, from the United States government.

5. THE CULTIVATION OF SUPPORT for the Republic among the Afro-Asians; the achieving of diplomatic recognition from these nations; the seeking of alliances with the Afro-Asians, including the nuclear-armed Chinese, to discourage U.S. federal power from reckless attacks on the Republic.

6. THE USE OF STATE POWER in the Republic to purify and improve education, to end discrimination and unemployment to start and run industries;

7. THE CREATION OF ECONOMIC UNIONS AND A COMMON MARKET between the Republic and the black Caribbean nations, with Africa, Asia, and South America, and, finally,

8. THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ECONOMIC ALLIANCES into larger and stronger political aggregates, starting first, perhaps, with a federation linking the black state on the continental U.S. with the black-controlled nations of the West Indies and Guyana.

This is, to be sure, a program of BLACK NATIONALISM. It would be untrue to say that this is the plan which Malcolm X whispered whole into the author’s ear. It is a plan synthesized from the contributions of many, only a few of whom are here recognized. But more than any man the late Malcolm X, who in the last 18 months of his life became God’s surest prophet to this lost black tribe in America, gave me to see it as I have seen it. Therefore, that men may know who we are and what we believe as distinguished from others, I have made bold to call this the MALCOLM X DOCTRINE and we who pursue it THE MALCOLMITES.

Now, brothers and sisters, go forth for all that is just and good. Challenge and defeat the forces of evil — not for water sprinklers or even for dignity in the abstract, but for land and power, the ability to shape our own lives. Go forth and reconstruct the world!

EPILOGUE

August 1968

THE Black Man’s new and final — final because it will be victorious for us — war in America has been slow starting. It was 1963 when the dogs and fire-hoses had been used with such brutality against us in Birmingham, 1963 when the young blacks of Birmingham had lifted the first molotov cocktail against the police, and 1963 when, finally, innocent black children would be murdered and maimed in a bombblast, set by a white racist, as they sat in Sunday School. For all the publicity and flurry which would surround nonviolence for another five years, non-violence, as a hope-pregnant technique for black people, had died with the children in 1963.

True: it would be nearly a year before the valiant blacks of Harlem would add the rifle and shotgun to the molotov cocktail and thus open our final war in America. And it would be four years more before the blacks of Cleveland would trap and outgun the police in the ghetto, thus punctuating that period — four years long — during which we had been the victor in destroying the beast’s property with the torch, but during which he, the beast, had been the victor in the number of persons killed. Now, having passed Cleveland, we will never go back. For this is a prime characteristic of the black man’s war here: that we progress slowly toward all-out conflict, but, once past a step, we never go back.

As I write this, young black men in Inkster, a suburb of Detroit, have shot and killed a state policeman and wounded several others. As you read this, other black men will almost certainly be taking their toll of white policemen’s lives because — the white policeman is the shock-troop of the oppressor’s army, because the white policeman has been the closest, most visible, most palpable, most explosively vicious instrument of the white race’s continuous brutality against us, the chief instrument of the white race’s will against us.

Like the black guerrillas in Inkster these others, too, will probably have been exposed to the concept of land and power. It is this concept which must shape the next meaningful step in our war in America.

The exercises in the northern cities, the war against the police, are a demonstration of the courage of our generation, and our determination, a statement of contempt for the so-called odds against us. The war against the police is a necessary response of men to brutality, and it must be aided by all of us. Every black person has this obligation: to support the black underground, to support those who bear arms — through confidence in the underground, through pride in the guerrillas, through money where that is necessary, through concealing the guns, the ordnance, the equipment, and the persons of the guerrillas, through medical and legal services, through giving information to the underground, through service on juries and a vote for acquittal — this is most important — when black guerrillas are hapless enough to be captured and tried by the enemy. After Cleveland, no one of us, black, stands beyond the obligation to support and serve — in some way — the black underground. For, non-violence failed, after the fair trial of eight difficult, suffering years (1955 through 1963): no one can ask for more. Now it is our turn.

And you who are in the underground have obligations too. The name of the game is service. Your act is without the blessing of God, of history, of your people unless it is performed for the purpose of serving the Revolution. Your oath requires that you be a leader in creating a better world and a better people: that you reject the use of narcotics or the sale of them to your brothers and sisters or Negroes; that you reject the hustle, putting game on brothers and sisters; that you treat brothers’ wives as one’s own sisters. You have an obligation to protect black people; to educate black people and Negroes without terror, if possible, to create opportunities for non-combative brothers and sisters to serve the revolution, without exploiting them. And what is given for the Revolution, what is solicited for the Revolution, what is taken for the Revolution must go to the Revolution; the good guerrilla will be sustained. Then, call yourself not a guerrilla-revolutionary unless you submit to intolerance for cowardice and death for treachery, laziness or sloth.

You have the further obligation of moving our war in America toward the successful acquisition of land and power, on this continent, in our time. Do not be misled and do not mislead your brothers into thinking that you must die in the streets of the northern cities; this would be good enough — to fight in the streets of the northern cities for nothing more than our dignity and our manhood — were there no further goal and no possibility of further victory. But the further goal is here, and it is attainable: land and power, a separate, free, progressive, rich powerful black nation, in our time, on this continent, through your faith and your courage and your arms.

Many brothers must come South with us now and fight as guerrillas and as soldiers in the Primary Army, the Initial Expeditionary Force, to hold the land and protect the sovereignty of the Republic of New Africa. Many more brothers must go to overseas bases, by the hundreds of thousands, to train and be equipped with the modern implements of war, to* return here, finally, and consolidate our victory, that we all may build, after our War In America, a new society in which war is fought no more and mankind together, having used technology to serve our animal needs, may turn to the pursuit of God, to the pursuit of man’s true place in the universe and mankind’s true destiny.

Republic of New Afrika map

Republic of New Afrika map

Report from black america 1969.JPG
How Social Movements Die.jpg

“Int this book, I have attempted to shed some light on social movement demobilization (i.e., why individuals no longer associate with a political challenger pursuing social change, why the ideas initially pursued by dissidents shift in fundamental ways, why the activities selected by challengers are altered, and why formal institutions cease to exist. . . .

Essentially, my argument involved a co-evolutionary dynamic composed of behavioral challengers - social movement organizations (SMOs) and political authorities. The former (the movement institution) attempts to recruit, socialize, and act on behalf of specific goals using a wide variety of tactics - specifically those viewed as being outside of the mainstream of political engagement and frequently with an element of coercion involved (e.g., contentious politics). The latter (authorities) attempts to intimidate, frustrate, scare off, and/or eliminate challengers with a wide variety of tactics, most notably overt and covert repressive activity. Co-evolution becomes relevant because both sides of the conflict respond to each other’s attempts at influencing them, and they do so in a way that attempts to simultaneously promote their own survival and their opponent’s death or containment. The different actors are not simply shocked and perturbed by each effort, however, as currently perceived. Rather, I argue that attempts are made to reduce the impact of conflictual exchanges during the course of the conflict.

On one hand SMOs realize that authorities attempt to disrupt them, and they try to prepare their membership for what could transpire, informing them about what will happen, what it will be like, and what they should do if and when it occurs. I called this reappraisal. In addition to this, movement organizations attempt to provide their members with enough social and psychological support, identity, and effectiveness in understanding what is going on and meeting the needs of constituents so that they can establish and retain trust (i.e., a willingness to put oneself into another’s hands despite significant risk.)

On the other hand, political authorities realize that SMOs attempt to counter their attempts at disruption, and thus they attempt to counter the counter-activity. One approach to this is what I called overwhelming, when authorities apply more repression than anticipated but of the same type. Alternatively, authorities can try outwitting, when they apply strategies that are different from what dissidents believe will be used against them. Governments also attempt to create distrust, but for this to actually work, challengers generally need to internalize and express their suspicions, thereby partially taking the responsibility for this movement problem. Toward this end, on some occasions, authorities can plant stories about infiltration, release information suggesting subversion, or make their agents easily identifiable to try to wield influence. . . .

Within this book, these hypotheses were explored through process tracing, using a unique data source that covered a group called the Republic of New Afrika (RNA) and the efforts of the U.S. Government to monitor, contain, and destroy this social movement organization. This interaction took place between 1968 and 1971. As conceived, the RNA pursued four objectives: (1) they wanted five states in the Deep South to be given to African Americans so that they could create their own nation (institutionalizing the one that already existed), (2) they wanted reparations for slavery, (3) they wanted a plebiscite to determine what should happen with blacks, and (4) they wanted a separate government. . . .

Consulting more than ten thousand documents (including local, state, and federal police records; media reports from Detroit and national newspapers; and various records from the RNA itself, I carefully examined five periods during the relevant state-dissident conflict: (!) the founding of the RNA on March 28, 1968; (2) the implementation and development of its secessionist initiative in Ocean Hill-Brownsville, Brooklyn, in October 15, 1968; (3) the shooting, raid, and mass arrest at New Bethel Baptist Church in Detroit on March 28, 1969 (known as the ‘New Bethel Incident’); (4) the development of a faction within the organization on November 6, 1969; and finally, (5) the raid, shooting, and arrest in Jackson, Mississippi, of assorted members that occurred on August 18, 1971. . . . Identifying the individuals involved, the institutional structure in place, interventions undertaken (i.e. actions), and ideas advocated by the organization to understand the degree of demobilization, I examined all documents in the available archive by the day for the two-month period before the events in question to establish a baseline. I then examined the time of the event itself as well as the two-month period after the event was completed to assess effects. This approach allowed me to examine what changes (if any) took place and how long these lasted . . . .

In line with my argument, the results disclosed that the demobilization of the RNA was connected with the organization’s largely failed approach at reappraisal of repression, but this did not account for the RNA’s demise by itself. Rather, it reinforced the loss of trust that resulted from the organization’s failure to achieve pursued goals, including the protection of organizational members from state repressive action. Generally preparing for overt repression, the organization was beset with a series of incidents involving covert action, which had been largely unanticipated. Overt behavior did exist, but the RNA was largely prepared for it, and thus it was somewhat less devastating for the group. . . . As anticipated, the inability to predict what form of repression would be used decreased trust within the organization.

Generally unanticipated and thus damaging to the organization’s morale was the protracted length of time over which repression influenced SMOs. . . . My investigation of the RNA, however, revealed that the dissidents talked or thought about planned activity concerning previous repressive behavior for months, and occasionally for years, after relevant events occurred. In a sense, the analysis suggests that dissidents become carriers of repressive experiences, which they thereafter take with them into the social movement, affecting all who come across them.

Also generally unexpected was the greater importance of covert repressive action (largely neglected in existing literature) relative to more overt behavior (largely the focus of existing work). As found, the fear of informants and internal subversion proved to influence RNA (de) mobilization far more than anything else, in part because it turned every other member of the organization into a potential traitor. Once perceived, this is hard to overcome. In the U.S. - RNA case, when the leader of the organization became aware of this dynamic (of members seeing each other as potential traitors and shutting off from further contact or communication), the members attempted to reestablish trust by decreasing the number of individuals to only the most trustworthy and starting again. Not only was this inefficient as the activities of these individuals were infiltrated as well, but this inevitably alienated those who were not among the innermost circle, and it decreased the number of people involved with movement activity as the pool had been reduce.

In the end, the RNA was caught in a downward spiral in which repeated failures of reappraisal continued to reduce trust and, in turn, other internal dynamics beset the organization that are frequently highlighted by social movement scholars. One important negative influence was an organizational factor generally considered under the category of rigidity. Over time, a small clique of individuals (led by Gaidi Obadele/Milton Henry and Imari Obadele/Richard Henry) hindered the RNA’s ability to adapt to changing personnel and circumstances because they largely dominated the RNA throughout the period under examination. Resource acquisition was a persistent source of tension as well, which fed into other organizational problems, both internal and external. Indeed, the more the RNA tried to do, the more money they tried to squeeze from their membership (especially the group in Detroit). this led to greater sacrifices, greater expectations about what would happen, and greater grievances when they did not.

Under all this weight, the individuals, institutions, and interventions largely demobilized. Although several individuals continued to engage in struggle, it seemed that ideas were the only elements of the claims-making effort that persisted. The dream of the black nation initially sparked by Malcolm X and later buoyed by Robert F. Williams within the relevant cohort of activists in Detroit continued, but nothing like how it was imagined. . . .

The RNA versus U.S. government research teaches those interested in challenging political authorities a great deal about social movement demobilization. For example, guided by the preceding findings, if one were trying to mobilize, then one would need to be concerned with selecting individuals who are committed to an organization with a set of ideas and tactics but not so rigidly devoted to them that they are unable to adapt to situations around them. It is clear from the analysis that there needs to be some structure for engagement within the institution and rules for dealing with participation, but there also needs to be some flexibility. Furthermore, there need to be mechanisms for adjusting these institutions and roles in a transparent, easily understood manner.

Although this sounds reasonable, given the task of challenging political authorities, potentially with deadly violence, these requirements are not as easy to establish and maintain as it might seem. For example, only someone significantly committed to a cause would want to join an organization in which individuals could potentially be killed (i.e., so-called high-risk challengers). It should not surprise anyone that these people might not be excessively flexible when it comes to adjusting objectives and tactics. However, effective reappraisal necessitates the systematic and continuous analysis of repressive behavior, understanding how it influences social movement participants, behavior, and institutions as well as communicating this understanding to those in the movement. Such a process is crucial for establishing trust which is determined by other things as well.

Indeed, my research shows that simply predicting repression correctly is not all that needs to be done. In the U.S.-RNA case, when overt repressive behavior occurred in line with movement expectations, this increased the trust of and reliance on the power of those contending with this type of repression, the military wing of the RNA (the Black Legion). This led the government to overwhelm as well as outwit the challengers, however, who seemed to realize that such a reliance revealed a particular vulnerability with the RNA. Specifically, as the role of the Black Legion increased, the role of others decreased, which in turn reduced general trust in the organization as more and more individuals were shut out. Once the struggle became a military one, only the military and those activities advocated by them were thought necessary.

Perhaps most important, the research discloses that individual members of SMOs are not only the physical embodiment of the revolutionary cause but potentially the embodiment of fear, paranoia, and duplicitous activity, which advances the government’s agenda. . . . .

A final point concerns reducing the potential for wedge issues being developed within challenging institution and decreasing the potential for political authorities to exploit them. This involves maintaining a constant watch on topics over which group members are highly divided and attempting to diffuse the development or escalation of such tensions. . . . .

THINKING MORE (AND DIFFERENTLY) ABOUT THE CASE

Most of the RNA was involved with giving workshops, holding conferences and meetings, giving speeches, conducting petitions, and engaging in marches and demonstrations. The only thing “radical” about the group’s tactics concerned the preparation for military confrontation with the U.S. government in the form of shooting practice, hand-to-hand combat, survival training, discussions of guerrilla activity as a second-strike capability, and secession. The group was not like the American Communist Party, trying to overthrow all of capitalism, but they clearly were more radical than the anti-tax activists who would rather avoid U.S. political authorities than take them on directly under any circumstances.

When it comes down to it, the RNA was also more radical than the Nation of Islam (NOI) and the Black Panther Party (BPP). Although the NOI discussed secession, they generally seemed content with carving out small sections of American cities and covertly having a presence. The NOI never overtly tried to challenge U.S. political authorities or overtly secede. Similarly, the RNA was far more ambitious than the BPP , which largely accepted the U.S. government, but in the end seems to have had a much more obvious and enduring impact on American politics and social life in general. The various elements of the RNA are worth contemplating, for it helps us understand what they can be reasonably compared to.

The RNA was interested in pulling the black ‘nation’ out of the United States. By almost any measure, this would be viewed as a radical objective, thereby suggesting that perhaps the RNA should have adopted a less open structure. Some privacy and secrecy would have helped the organization engage in its activities without tipping off U.S. officials to what they were doing. In addition, it would have reduced suspicion as it would have been harder for unsympathetic individuals to gain entry.

Structurally, the RNA was semi-open, which seems to differ from movement organizations that maintained similar objectives within comparable political economic contexts. Essentially, the RNA would let any African American attend their meetings, and they were relatively open to individuals joining after some minor hurdles were overcome (e.g. taking a few nation-building classes and doing some reading.) This is a great approach if one is interested in trying to reach as wide an audience as possible. This approach is questionable, however, if there are concerns such as those of the RNA, about infiltration and internal subversion.

Interestingly, the RNA generally disregarded the possibility that it could be infiltrated or overestimated its ability to operate in the midst of government agents and subversion. This error proved to be critical for the organization and for those studying their demobilization. For example, given the RNA’s actual objective, it would have reduced the chances of infiltration and subversion and diminished trust had the RNA been more closed. At the same time, this could have made repression of the organization more legitimate in the eyes of the American audience, which tends to view closed organizations more skeptically - especially those of a radical nature. In fact, I would maintain that every step toward a more radical and/or military approach increased the government’s interest in exploiting the organizational structure of the RNA. In contrast, if the RNA had moderated its objective, then it could have been semi-or even fully open.

The radical nature of the RNA’s objective was countered by its rather conventional approach to achieving it, for example, a plebiscite would lead to an official declaration of nationhood, U.S. recognition, and negotiation for reparations and separation.

The RNA needed mass support from the black population to make their declaration of sovereignty legitimate. Most African Americans, however, were not aware of the RNA.

So the dissident organization had to make itself open not only to sympathetic blacks, who were not yet committed, by also to those who were just curious an/or wanted to listen, as well as to black who pledged allegiance to the U.S. government. . . .

Much of the self-defense rhetoric and planning of the black power movement was to prevent this from taking place. What would protect black folk from such an experience? The answer was simple: an effective, military-trained fighting force that, through its very existence or through its behavior, would deter such an attack and potentially engage in effective military-trained fighting force that, through its very existence or through its behavior, would deter such an attack and potentially engage in effective military behavior by inflicting significant damage on the opponent. Accordingly, when the RNA had the opportunity, they created an army - adorned in a full African-inspired uniform and engaged in shooting practice and other drills such as hand-to-hand combat.

In addition to this, the RNA wrote about and to a lesser extent talked about something they referred to as ‘second strike capability.’ Here the idea was that if the RNA and its citizens overrun in some manner, then others would seek vengeance with ‘sleeper’ (i.e., agents who would become active when needed) throughout the United States who would engage in guerrilla warfare, rebellion, and/or random acts of terror.

In a sense, the RNA took the fear that many whites had of every African American (i.e. the suspicion that deep down they might not like whites and that they were ready to strike out against them) and used it for their own purpose of appearing to magnify their strength.

This orientation was important for what happened to the RNA because the ‘defensive’ posture they adopted was interpreted as ‘offensive’ by authorities (like discussions of how weapons believed to be deterrent could be seen as provocative). In this view, the RNA was directly challenging the state’s monopoly on the holding and wielding coercive power as well as the claim of sole legitimate use of this power within the relevant territorial jurisdiction. Such a situation is particularly interesting when thinking about current U.S. policies concerning the recent ‘Stand Your Ground’ laws.

What else could the RNA have done? Well, in the beginning, the RNA was focused on the overt attack as the primary threat, and thus one could argue that they could have been more focused on covert repressive action. At a minimum, they could have at least conceived of a combination of the two. This would have introduced into the RNA some more detailed protocols for screening and accepting new members as well as developing sophisticated mechanisms for checking on individuals once they had entered into the organization (shifting their approach to reappraisal). . . . Thus numerous movement organizations at the same period had moved to a similar conclusion. Related, any black organization that was trying to mobilize people at the time had to address the issue of black victimization. Some kind of protection had to be offered to get people to overcome their very real fears of engaging in social struggle. The RNA took this task on directly. . . .

As conceived and practices, the RNA was a relatively open institution with elements that were closed, it was politically socialistic as well as democratic in orientation and maintained very broad goals. This is important for trust in different ways. For example, the openness of the organization (to anyone of African decent) was useful in that it allowed individuals to enter the space and see what was going on, enhancing transparency. Many things were also hidden from the average member, however, such as how the leadership made the decisions that they did, which would not have been good for building trust. Although the leadership was initially appointed, which would have limited a sense of trust, they were selected as members of a ‘government,’ and thus they were expected to be accountable in some sense . . . .

Finally, the broadness and ambitiousness of the RNA’s goals made actual delivery and success difficult, if not impossible to achieve. . . .

With a clearer idea of what they wanted to do and how they would do it, it is likely that the RNA would have been better at staying with what they set out to do. . . .The group that formed the RNA had some reservoir of trust going into the social movement, but much of it rested on the backs of Malcolm X’s memory, the presence of Robert F. Williams, and the existence of the RNA itself, as well as several years’ worth of varied struggles. With high stakes and little time to pull things together, this put a tremendous amount of pressure on the dissident organization to deliver, but they had not quite worked out the end product. This said, they put forward an idea of what that end product could be and hoped that members of the ‘nation’ would step forward to assist in its actualization . . . .

Had the organization stayed with the southern focus or continued to prepare for a plebiscite in Detroit without distraction, they might have been able to avoid the internal dissension that followed as well as sustain the trust that comes with consistent effort on a core aspect of an organization’s goals.

Alternatively, the RNA could have followed its electoral secession strategy with trying to win the appointment of a police chief in a county where the black population was numerous and where they would be able to convince enough individuals to vote for a sympathetic candidate. Once appointed, the person could deputize the RNA members, and with this protection, they could then create part of the Republic. In a sense, the movement to Jackson was done more out of desperation and an attempt to get something done with as much fanfare and publicity as possible but with little mass.community support and limited RNA participation. . . .

With regard to the possibility that the U.S. government would have taken a different approach, I find this unlikely given the circumstances. In many respects, the RNA played to the strengths of the political authorities at the time in Detroit, Michigan, and the federal government. With the move to rural Mississippi, the RNA was no longer present within a sea of potential observers and sympathizers who could have born witness to what took place, such as at the time of the New Bethel Incident. Rather, they were in an isolated geographic locale - something that they feared in War in America. Moreover, the RNA provided probable cause with its discussion of nation building and secession. It was a small step from these concepts to the belief that potentially illegal weapons and explosives existed and that these might be used in some way, shape, or form against the government and/or whites in the area.

Share

JUNE 8, 1954: THE MOST IMPORTANT DAY IN 20TH CENTURY AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY

Exactly 66 years ago the Ethiopian Emperor, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, Conquering Lion of Judah came to Chicago after giving African Americans citizenship and their "forty acres and a mule" in a Black Empire at a time when America was practicing Jim Crow apartheid.

13 YEARS LATER, THE ETHIOPIAN EMPEROR USED MALCOLM X'S PETITION TO THE WORLD COURT TO PROSECUTE THE RACIST APARTHEID GOVERNMENT IN SOUTH AFRICA.

This is the story they haven't told you.

Excerpt from

50th Anniversary of His Imperial Majesty Emperor Haile Selassie I First Visit to the United States (1954-2004)

HIM Book cover.JPG

Jubilee Greetings and Rastafari Blessings from Chicago on June 8, 2004: 1,189 days before the Ethiopian Millennium

Exactly fifty years ago today, Haile Selassie I came to Chicago and made an unscheduled visit to the south side to visit South Park Baptist Church, 3722 S King Drive. I and Sister Myrah decided it was important to go to the church in an attempt to get a "touch"--an insight, an inspiration -- from remembering HIM's presence at that very spot exactly one jubilee later.

I&I visit was all the more significant due to the fact that this morning at 6:05 am CST the path of Venus directly crossed over the disc of the Sun, an event known as the Venus Transit. This event happens every 130 years and, according to Kiara Windrider and The Global Oneness Foundation,

"The energies of Sun and Venus blend together, and as these blended radiations make their way into the Earth's electromagnetic fields, it weaves the energies of love and unity into the mass consciousness of the planet, and potentially into the hearts of every man, woman, and child alive on Earth."

During this "astronomical event of the year" writes Carl Johan Calleman, PH.D,

“it is hard to avoid the impressions that the very transit of Venus across the Sun has somehow served to concentrate these energies and has sent an intensifying beam to planet Earth. During the Venus transits the cosmic energies were thus strongly amplified. There are however many good reasons to believe that the Venus transit on June 8, 2004. . . will herald a development of communications between human beings that is not based on technology. The chief reason is that we are now at a stage . . . that favors the right brain half and the intuitive faculties of our mind that are mediated by this. And so, we may expect that the upcoming Venus transit will launch an era of communications utilizing mental rather than electromagnetic fields. . . . Since there is no person alive today who was born in 1882 or earlier the Venus transit in 2004 will be everyone's first such experience. What may we then expect from this occurrence?"

Given that I and Sister Myrah were the only two people able to experience the Venus Transit in the very City where Haile Selassie was a full Jubilee ago, and in the exact location where His Imperial Majesty, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, Conquering Lion of Judah uttered His special message to the African in America, I raspectfully ask for the attention of the Rastafari Family Worldwide at this time.

Haile Selassie's message spoken at the South Park Baptist Church exactly fifty years ago today was that if the United States has been able to assume its outstanding position as leader in the world today,

"it has been due, in no small part, to your [i.e descendants of Africa] profound religious faith and ideals."

His Imperial Majesty also said,

"The high station which the United States has attained has also been due to the devoted labors of every American citizen. And not the least of the credit for these achievements is due to the numerous groups of American citizens who have made their home on the great African continent of which Ethiopia is proud to be a part."

Recalling his 1936 warning to the League of Nations, when Italy was invading his country, Haile Selassie said that in those

"difficult hours in our fight for independence, we were not standing alone because peoples of African origin throughout the world were with us in spirit through their moral and spiritual support. It is only natural, therefore, that we Africans should follow with deepest interest the inspiring achievements and contributions of the peoples of African origin in the United States. By your actions, your devotions and your sacrifices you are justifying throughout the world the advancement of the cause of racial and social equality and the right of all peoples to freedom, independence and self-expression."

In His Imperial Majesty's first exclusive interview since His arrival to the United States on May 25, 1954, Emperor Haile Selassie told the Chicago Defender newspaper that,

"My message to the colored people of the United States is that they continue to press forward with determination, their social and intellectual advancement, meeting all obstacles with Christian courage and tolerance, confident in the certainty of the eventual triumph of justice and equality throughout the world."

Lion+of+Judah+message+for+negroes.jpg

During the brief but exclusive interview the Emperor also exploded the oft repeated rumor that the people of Ethiopia do not wish to be identified with the colored people of America or associate themselves with their problems. With this rumor in mind, the Emperor, the Emperor was asked, "Is there a kindred feeling between your people and the colored people of America?" The Emperor replied:

"The people of Ethiopia feel the strongest bond of sympathy and understanding with the colored people of the United States. We greatly admire your achievements and your contributions to American life and the tremendous development of this great nation. I have been deeply impressed with the warmth of the reception which the colored people of the United States have reserved for me."

Lion of Judah Links Negroes.JPG

Next, the Emperor was asked, "What do you feel is the best solution to the unrest found in Africa today?" Emperor Haile Selassie replied,

"The orderly progress of the African people toward self-government and the increasing participation by the people themselves in the institutions of their government, is, in my opinion, the best long term solution to the political tensions which exist in parts of Africa where self-determination has not yet been fully achieved. [Ras note: Remember that HIM is speaking in 1954, before even Ghana had independence (1957)-- nine years before the OAU was formed.] The expansion of opportunity for education and the improvement in living standards through development programs will also be important factors in any such program."

Finally, the Emperor was asked what had been the highlight of his visit to America thus far. Haile Selassie replied,

“I have of course been greatly impressed by the warmth and cordiality of my reception, including of course, the overwhelming warmth of the reception extended me by the colored people of this great nation."

Lion+of+Judah+is+King+for+a+Day.jpg

That was His Imperial Majesty Haile Selassie I's message exactly fifty (50) years ago today. This message came at a time when His Imperial Majesty had already invited Africans in America to repatriate to Ethiopia in 1919 (Ethiopian Empress Zauditu’s nephew and Commander of the Imperial Army Dedjamatch Nadao's secretary Ato Sinkas to Harlem’s Black Jewish leader and Musical Director of the UNIA Rabbi Arnold Josiah Ford);

Abyssinian Mission.JPG

again in 1922 at the UNIA Convention; in 1927 through Dr. Workeneh Martin; and in 1929 to Rabbi Arnold Josiah Ford through Ato Gabrou Desta, who carried Ras Tafari's message that

“We would welcome them back to Ethiopia, their Fatherland . . . . There is plenty of room for them here and we are certain they would be of the greatest aid in restoring their ancient land to its pristine glory.”

Recognizing the need of incoming Repatriates to become Citizens of Ethiopia, His Imperial Majesty issued in the Consolidated Laws of Ethiopia that become part of the 1931 Constitution, under Section 9 NATIONALITY 12(2), the following provision providing for Citizenship for Black people of the West:

“12(2) If the Imperial Ethiopian Government deems any foreigner who applies for Ethiopian citizenship to be of value or if it finds other special reason which convinces it that the applicant should be granted citizenship it may grant him/her Ethiopian citizenship even if he/she does not fulfill the [residency and language] requirements prescribed in Article 12(b) and (d) of the Nationality Law of 1930.”

By 1931, with a framework in place for the full Repatriation of Blacks from the West, Ato Gabrou informed Rabbi Ford and Eudora Paris of land concessions granted.Of course, the Fascist invasion of Ethiopia in 1935-36 interrupted the Repatriation movement of Africans in America until 1948, when, in a letter to the Executive Committee of EWF Local 31 in Kingston, Jamaica, EWF Executive President George Bryan announced the 500 acre Shashemane land grant, which was the personal property of the Emperor, given on a trial basis, "since the way it is utilized will be the touchstone for additional grants."

In 1953, His Imperial Majesty sent Madame Sahara on an 18 month repatriation-recruiting mission through Black communities in the United States. A year later, Mamie Richardson of the EWF, went on a similar tour in Jamaica. In the twelve years since His Imperial Majesty regained His Throne in Addis Ababa, Haile Selassie had quadrupled His national economy, Ethiopia was exporting meat, cereals and vegetables to the Middle East, had established a state of the art telecommunications facility in Kagnew, and had made Ethiopian Airlines one of the best and most competitive in the world. That is why Emperor Haile Selassie told a special joint session of the US Congress, on May 28, 1954 that,

"In consequence, in many respects, and particularly since the last world war, Ethiopia has become a new frontier of widely expanding opportunities, notwithstanding the tremendous set-back which we suffered in the unprovoked invasion of our country nineteen years ago and the long years of unaided struggle against an infinitely stronger enemy. The last seventeen years have seen the quadrupling of our foreign trade, currency and foreign exchange holdings. Holdings of American dollars have increased ten times over. The Ethiopian dollar has become the only US dollar-based currency in the Middle East today. The assets of our national bank of issue have increased one thousand percent. Blessed with what is perhaps the most fertile soil in Africa, well-watered, and with a wide variety of climates ranging from temperate on the plateau, to the tropical in the valleys, Ethiopia can grow throughout the year crops, normally raised only in widely separated areas of the earth's surface.

Since the war, Ethiopia has become the granary of the Middle East, as well as the only exporter of meat, cereals and vegetables. Whereas at the end of the war, every educational facility had been destroyed, today, schools are springing up throughout the land, the enrollment has quadrupled and, as in the pioneer days in the United States, and indeed, I presume, as in the lives of many of the distinguished members of Congress here present, school-children, in their zeal for education, take all sorts of work in order to earn money to purchase text books and to pursue their education. Finally, through the return in 1952 of its historic ports on the Red Sea and of the long-lost territory of Eritrea, Ethiopia has not only regained access to the sea, but has been one of the few states in the post-war world to have regained lost territory pursuant to post-war treaties and in application of peaceful means and methods. We have thus become a land of expanding opportunities where the American pioneering spirit, ingenuity and technical abilities have been and will contribute to be welcomed."

Again, on June 8, 1954, His Imperial Majesty told 1,1000 of Chicago's top business, civic and government leaders that,

"Unlimited opportunities exist (in Ethiopia) for American capital and pioneering spirit . . . "

Having recognized the "no small part" that Africans in America contributed to what Haile Selassie called America's "phenomenal progress", Emperor Haile Selassie I, by the time of His visit to Chicago on June 8, 1954, was well-ready to make good on his "Repatriation Offer" which the Chicago Defender newspaper reported as follows:

"a house, rent-free, a salary at least equalling that which applicants are now earning or could earn in America, free transportation to Ethiopia for applicants and their families, annual three-months vacations with pay and -- in some instinces -- automobiles provided by the government. . . . Persons interested in applying for employment in Ethiopia or receiving additional information are advised to write the Ethiopian Embassy in Washington."

Ethiopia Jobs Go Begging Repatriation Offer.JPG

Given that June 8, 2004 is a day of intensified energies for mental communications on the Jubilee Anniversary of His Imperial Majesty, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, Conquering Lion of Judah's presence in the place where I was born and raised, I can't help but to take time to Commemorate the message that the Almighty Himself gave fifty years ago, and its relevance to today. Now, I have a message for the whole Rastafari Family Worldwide.

The message is this:

Exactly fifty years ago, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords came to carry I&I home to a place He Himself had prepared that where He lived, I&I shall abide. It was open to all, yet, even unto today, few have forwarded? Why? Why did I&I fail to claim and manifest I&I deliverance fifty years ago? Ras Mora, during the Jubilee Commemoration Exhibition in Brooklyn, New York, gave the reasoned answer summed up thus: faced with the choice between Repatriation and Integration, the people of African descent in America chose integration. On the heels of the integrated military coming out of World War II and the Korean War, having, apparently, triumphed in the Brown vs. Board of Education decision, We, the Black people of the West, MISSED I&I DELIVERANCE!

Consider this: Ethiopia in 1954 was an emerging world power every bit as much as the United States, who itself had just suffered a "Great Depression" in the late 1920's and early 1930's. Like Ethiopia in 1935-1936, America became embroiled in War in 1941, having been attacked at Pearl Harbor. Today, America is celebrating her "D-Day" victory at Normandy, just as Ethiopians celebrate the Great Ethiopian Anniversary of May 5, 1941 when Emperor Haile Selassie entered Addis Ababa to regain His Throne. Fifty years after the Emperor of Ethiopia came and visited the President of the United States, Ethiopia, the first civilization on earth which gave all peoples religion, science and culture, has now become the last in nearly every major index of quality of life, while America has become the world's only superpower nation.

What happened? Now, fifty years later look at the facts:

Ethiopia is no longer a "well-watered" food exporter with a sky-rocketing economy. Though I&I never give up hope for a glorious Ethiopian future, the fact is that Ethiopia is ravaged by drought, famine, illness, and lack of development. Ethiopia again lost her access to the Red Sea when Eritrea separated. Is this what Haile Selassie envisioned in 1954?

Haile Selassie was recruiting I&I to play no small part in Ethiopia's development, no less than I&I played in America's of which he said I&I had reason to be proud. Thus, I&I have to take some responsibility for the conditions in Ethiopia just as I&I have to take responsibility for conditions in our communities in the west. To the degree that Haile Selassie already set I&I free, so is I&I responsibility at home and abroad. As the prophet Marcus Mosiah Garvey said in a speech delivered at Madison Square Garden on March 16, 1924:

“The thoughtful and industrious of our race want to go back to Africa, because we realize it will be our only hope of permanent existence. We cannot all go in a day or in a year, ten or twenty years. It will take time under the rule of modern economics, to entirely or largely depopulate a country of a people, who have been its residents for centuries, but we feel that with proper help for fifty years, the problem can be solved. We do not want all the Negroes in Africa. Some are no good here, and naturally will be no good there . . . . “ [Philosophy and Opinions of Marcus Garvey]

What effect has the thoughtful and industrious of the race had on Ethiopia fifty years after Haile Selassie, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, Conquering Lion of Judah actually came to carry I&I home? From this perspective, one must honestly answer, very little. Did not Haile Selassie have great expectations from I&I? Yes!!! Shashemane has not been developed, additional grants were not given, and "phenomenal progress" in which our ancestors played no small progress has not been achieved.

Thus, the true meaning of the Jubilee Commemoration of His Imperial Majesty Emperor Haile Selassie I First Visit to the United States, 1954, for We, the descendants of Africans in America, is the mercy and forgiveness of His Imperial Majesty for having failed to "Come out of her my people".

As Rasses in America, our God and King came to carry His people home and did not fail to provide everything I&I need for a better life in our Forefather's and Foremother's land. Emperor Haile Selassie came and gave His people citizenship and their "forty acres and a mule" in a Black Empire at a time when America was practicing Jim Crow apartheid. We chose to integrate into America.

Our experts, reflecting on fifty year after the Brown v Board of Education decision, have concluded that the sitution of public education for Black youth is worse than fifty years ago. Likewise is the situation for Black people in the criminal justice situation, for Black farmers, in every field accept sports and entertainment. In all, the descendants of Africans in America have not become free from the legacy of slavery and racism.

Now, at the outbreak of hostilities against America which started on September 11, 2001 (Ethiopian News Years), the descendants of Africans in America have become second class citizens and have integrated themselves into the judgment which is coming to America. When weapons of mass destruction are used again against America, in America, there will not be any distinction or discrimination made. The integrated African Americans will suffer America's fate right along with her first-class citizens.

I&I are in the same position as descendants of Africans in Europe, who were looking at the outbreak of hostilities in Europe. At that time, enlightened people could see the soon-to-come consequences of failed foreign policies. Haile Selassie himself said at the League of Nations,

"Today it is us [Ethiopia], tomorrow it will be you [Europe]. You have struck the match in Ethiopia, but it shall burn Europe!"

Imagine you were a Black person , living in Europe, and foreseeing what was to come. The Voice of Ethiopia, which became the official organ of the Ethiopian World Federation, Inc., as early as 1937, published articles every week foretelling of the "doom" of Europe. All the bombs, air raids, tanks, trenches, dead bodies, millions of dead bodies, war, poverty, famine, millions of dead bodies. Ask anyone to tell of their struggles surviving World War II in Europe . . . . Back then, there was no "Africa for the Africans" to Repatriate to. Haile Selassie was himself living in Bath, England! There was no place to run to, to escape to. Haile Selassie had only just begun to prepare a place that where He is, I&I shall abide. Black people in Europe must have been horrified upon the realization that they could not escape the same dark fate which befell Ethiopians at home! Well, that same fate is about to befall America. Yet, descendants of Africans in America were given an opportunity for deliverance in 1954 and instead chose to integrate into America.

Not knowing this history, descendants of Africans in America could not properly respond to the destruction of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. That is why, in the just published book Paradox of Loyalty: An African American Response to the War on Terrorism edited by Julianne Malveux and Reginna A. Green with a Forward by Cornell West, published by third World Press in Chicago, among the twenty-six (26) submissions purporting to represent the full range of African American response to the War on Terrorism, none of them express an emigrationist, repatriation response. Given the blighted condition of Black life in America, along with the fact that America was now the target of hostilities and has become the most vulnerable in her history, there is now, more than any period in African American history, reason to embark on a "Back to Africa" program. With diminished quality of life and the impending "doom of America", Repatriation to Ethiopia, our divine heritage as HIM said, represents today, as it did in 1937, our best and last hope for existence itself.

Read the details of Ethiopia’s effort to sue the racist apartheid government of South Africa at the World Court at the time when Malcolm X was trying do do the same thing with Ethiopia’s help.

AFTER BROWN VS. BOARD OF EDUCATION: HAILE SELASSIE, MALCOLM X, MARTIN LUTHER KING, REPATRIATION AND THE OAAU

Lion of Judah Conquers Windy City.JPG
Share

Marcus Garvey Message to the People: Lesson 16 Propaganda (and War), The Course of African Philosophy

Marcus Garvey Course of African Philosophy.jpg

LESSON 16

PROPAGANDA

(Relevant excerpts in the wake of the murder by torture of George Floyd)

“Propaganda means to propagate or to make known extensively some particular phase of human intelligence. The desire is to convert or influence the people to the acceptance of the truth of that particular intelligence that is sought to be spread among them.

Propaganda can be true or false in its origin or intent; but it is always directed at the public for the purpose of winning the support of that public to the sentiment expressed in the propaganda. If you hate a man, giving him a bad name well may explain one of the purposes of propaganda without truth behind it.

Nearly all organized efforts have a system of propaganda to convert people to their principles and get them to support them even though there may be no merit behind it all.

Propaganda is all around you; to make you buy a special brand of cigarettes, although no good, but advertised to be the best; to make you drink or use a certain brand of tea; telling you of its wonderful qualities and its everlasting benefits when thee is absolutely nothing to it, and so on.

Before the war of 1914-1918, the Germans were known to be the most cultured and scientific people in Europe. When the war started, the other nations in order to discredit the Germans and to hold them up to world ridicule and the contempt of civilization, released the propaganda that classified the Germans as Huns and barbarians. This also reveals how organized intention can be carried to the public for public acceptance without thought.

The press, cinema, pulpit, schoolroom are all propaganda agencies for one thing or the other. The pulpit carries religious propaganda, the schoolroom carries educational propaganda, the press carries out written propaganda, the platform carries on oral propaganda, the cinema carries out demonstrative propaganda. These methods have been devised by the white man to spread his ideas universally among men. That is why he is able in a major sense, to control the mind of the people of the world.

The white man is a great propagandist. He fully and completely realizes the value of propaganda. Therefore, you must organize your propaganda to undo the propaganda of other people; if their propaganda affects your interest. The bible is religious propaganda, the school book is literary propaganda. The novels and books you read are also literary propaganda, all calculated to bring about certain results beneficial to the propagandist.

Never forget then that you are surrounded by a world of propaganda, all dressed up or cooped up to suit a doubtful public that is not careful about what it digests from without. The artist is also a propagandist. He paints pictures to convey the idea he wants to impress upon the non-thinking and doubtful public. The sculptor is also a propagandist. He chisels figures and portrays them to suit the aims or purpose he wants to achieve. The pictures of the Madonna and Christ and of the angels are painted portraying the white race, so as ti inflict upon the rest of the world the belief that God, the angels and the Holy Family are all white, as well as Adam and Eve. Adam and Eve were black. They also paint the devil and the imps of hell black to impress upon the world the belief that all that is black is evil and all that is white is good and holy.

Tear from your walls, all pictures that glorify other races. Tear up and burn every bit of propaganda that does not carry your idea of things. Treat them as trash.

When you go to the cinema and you see the glorification of others in the pictures don’t accept it; don’t believe it to be true. Instead, visualize yourself achieving whatever is presented, and if possible, organize your propaganda to that effect. You should always match propaganda with propaganda.

Have your own newspapers, your own artists, your own sculptors, your own pulpits, your own platforms, print your own books and show your own motion pictures and sculpture your own subjects. Never accept as yours subjects of another race; but glorify all the good in yourselves. . . .

Watch the newspapers, magazines and journals daily for propaganda against your race or your institutions; particularly against the U.N.I.A. Rush into print immediately a defense of your race institutions and organizations from any attack. Never allow an insult propagated to go unanswered by you. Be ever vigilant to down anything by way of propaganda that dishonors or discredits you. Don’t help the other fellow carry on propaganda against yourself or your race. All propaganda comes from the arranged desire of individuals and not from a race as a whole. It is the thinkers and leaders who originate propaganda. By insisting on its wide distribution they get other people to think as they like.

Don’t accept the thoughts of others through propaganda, unless it coincides with yours. Don’t follow the band down the street because it plays sweet music to the propaganda of the circus manager. He may lead you into the circus tent and take away your pocketbook; that is to say, don’t get on anybody’s band wagon, because he may drive you to hell with his sweet music. Like the pied Piper of Hamlin, who played his sweet pipe and led the rats out of the city and into the sea and drowned them.

Propaganda organized by somebody else is always calculated to take advantage of you. Don’t help them do so. Always ask, what is this about? What is the object of this? Who has sent this out? What is he aiming at? Will it hurt me and my race? Is he trying to get an advantage over me? Is it honest? Is it true? If you ask these questions of all propaganda that comes up, before you swallow it, you will be able to take care of yourself. . . .

The idea of the white man making black a symbol of mourning and sadness is just to show the extreme of the purity of whiteness and it’s joy and happiness. Reverse this. If possible teach the Negro that when he is in mourning he should wear white, and when he is happy to wear black. This is meeting propaganda with propaganda, the hatchet with the hatchet, the stick with the stick and the stone with the stone. Everything on earth is man’s creation. So out of man’s propaganda and mind he has created his special systems of opinion to meet his designs.

Therefore, customs are based upon acceptance of propaganda skillfully engineered. Have your own propaganda and hand it down through the ages. . . . Write your own interpretation of the scriptures and history and teach them as far as the interpretation of others affect your race.

Challenge the thought of any book of other literature that dishonors or discredits you in any particular way; and give it the widest publicity so as to undo the harm intended. Remember, always, that an error not corrected ultimately becomes a fact. Never allow false statements or allegations against your race to become current and pass into history as if they were facts.

UNIA Soldiers.jpg

WAR

War is the hellish passion of man let loose in opposition to man. It sums up the cruelty of man towards man. It always aims at the stronger taking advantage of the weaker to gain that which could not have been acquired otherwise; because of the failure to use human reason. War comes when men fail to adjust their differences with reasoning.

Always be prepared for the exhibition of the vilest passions of men in war. Man has always warred against his fellow man. . . . No generation has shown that man intends to become wholly reasonable. Therefore, in time of peace, prepare for war, so as not to be caught unprepared by your enemy who will naturally be the stronger, if he is prepared while you are not prepared in using the implements of warfare. Was is not a good thing, but man is also not a good being. You must expect war from his disposition. All things are fair in war to win the advantage over your enemy.

When there is war, use all the implements at your disposal to defeat your enemy. Do not discuss terms while you are warring; discuss them after you are victorious. When war comes, all resources of intelligence and wealth, all utilities are placed at the service of those who conduct the war to make them victorious on behalf of those for whom they are warring. Therefore, have in view the obtaining and controlling of all such resources, factors and utilities that may be necessary as ammunitions of war.

There may be righteous wars as well as unrighteous wars; depending entirely upon the civilization that makes the war or defends itself in war. It may be war to put down human abuse in favor of human virtue. The war-makers have always justified war in some way or another. If you become engaged in a war, always have justification for your engagement.

If the war is not yours, get something out of it before you go into it and complete it for the good of others. Never go into war foolishly. Never sacrifice your life without good results for your cause. War is the best time to take advantage of your transgressor, whoever he may be. Whenever he is engaged in war and he promises you nothing, you will never get anything from him in time of peace. Therefore, during the time of war make your bargains before you help anybody else in war. If you are suffering from the abuses of others and there should be a threat of war against them from some other source, encourage it because it will be your chance to force a square deal. The more other people war among themselves, the stronger you become if you exercise good judgment.

Divide your enemies so as to gain your advantage. Always keep them divided so as to be able to gain the advantage. Your only hope of escaping the hate and prejudice of other people is to keep them severely occupied with other problems. If they have nothing else to attend to, they will concentrate on you and your problems will be aggravated.

While others have gone to war, try to be at peace among yourselves to gather the spoils of war. Never talk war openly to your enemies; but be prepared for war. If you talk it, they will become prepared waiting for you. Keep the other races divided and fighting each other as much as you can so as to take advantage for yourselves. . . .

UNIA soldiers 2.jpg
Share